Literature DB >> 23530203

Normalization is a general neural mechanism for context-dependent decision making.

Kenway Louie1, Mel W Khaw, Paul W Glimcher.   

Abstract

Understanding the neural code is critical to linking brain and behavior. In sensory systems, divisive normalization seems to be a canonical neural computation, observed in areas ranging from retina to cortex and mediating processes including contrast adaptation, surround suppression, visual attention, and multisensory integration. Recent electrophysiological studies have extended these insights beyond the sensory domain, demonstrating an analogous algorithm for the value signals that guide decision making, but the effects of normalization on choice behavior are unknown. Here, we show that choice models using normalization generate significant (and classically irrational) choice phenomena driven by either the value or number of alternative options. In value-guided choice experiments, both monkey and human choosers show novel context-dependent behavior consistent with normalization. These findings suggest that the neural mechanism of value coding critically influences stochastic choice behavior and provide a generalizable quantitative framework for examining context effects in decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23530203      PMCID: PMC3625302          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1217854110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  39 in total

1.  Natural signal statistics and sensory gain control.

Authors:  O Schwartz; E P Simoncelli
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Selectivity and spatial distribution of signals from the receptive field surround in macaque V1 neurons.

Authors:  James R Cavanaugh; Wyeth Bair; J Anthony Movshon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Response of neurons in the lateral intraparietal area during a combined visual discrimination reaction time task.

Authors:  Jamie D Roitman; Michael N Shadlen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Impact of expected reward on neuronal activity in prefrontal cortex, frontal and supplementary eye fields and premotor cortex.

Authors:  Matthew R Roesch; Carl R Olson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-06-11       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Matching behavior and the representation of value in the parietal cortex.

Authors:  Leo P Sugrue; Greg S Corrado; William T Newsome
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-06-18       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Loss aversion and inhibition in dynamical models of multialternative choice.

Authors:  Marius Usher; James L McClelland
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  A model of neuronal responses in visual area MT.

Authors:  E P Simoncelli; D J Heeger
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  When choice is demotivating: can one desire too much of a good thing?

Authors:  S S Iyengar; M R Lepper
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2000-12

9.  Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  M N Shadlen; W T Newsome
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Context-dependent foraging decisions in rufous hummingbirds.

Authors:  Melissa Bateson; Susan D Healy; T Andrew Hurly
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  83 in total

Review 1.  The Malleability of Intertemporal Choice.

Authors:  Karolina M Lempert; Elizabeth A Phelps
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Value-based attentional capture affects multi-alternative decision making.

Authors:  Sebastian Gluth; Mikhail S Spektor; Jörg Rieskamp
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Value-based attentional capture influences context-dependent decision-making.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Kexin Cha; Napat Rangsipat; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Action and perception are temporally coupled by a common mechanism that leads to a timing misperception.

Authors:  Elena Pretegiani; Corina Astefanoaei; Pierre M Daye; Edmond J FitzGibbon; Dorina-Emilia Creanga; Alessandra Rufa; Lance M Optican
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  A computational perspective on autism.

Authors:  Ari Rosenberg; Jaclyn Sky Patterson; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Dynamic divisive normalization predicts time-varying value coding in decision-related circuits.

Authors:  Kenway Louie; Thomas LoFaro; Ryan Webb; Paul W Glimcher
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Mental representations distinguish value-based decisions from perceptual decisions.

Authors:  Stephanie M Smith; Ian Krajbich
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-04-05

Review 8.  Do humans make good decisions?

Authors:  Christopher Summerfield; Konstantinos Tsetsos
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Having More Choices Changes How Human Observers Weight Stable Sensory Evidence.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Kexin Cha; Sean Deering; Annalisa M Salazar; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Adaptive gain control during human perceptual choice.

Authors:  Samuel Cheadle; Valentin Wyart; Konstantinos Tsetsos; Nicholas Myers; Vincent de Gardelle; Santiago Herce Castañón; Christopher Summerfield
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.