Literature DB >> 23529145

Cross-education for improving strength and mobility after distal radius fractures: a randomized controlled trial.

Charlene R A Magnus1, Cathy M Arnold, Geoffrey Johnston, Vanina Dal-Bello Haas, Jenny Basran, Joel R Krentz, Jonathan P Farthing.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of cross-education (contralateral effect of unilateral strength training) during recovery from unilateral distal radius fractures on muscle strength, range of motion (ROM), and function.
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial (26-wk follow-up).
SETTING: Hospital, orthopedic fracture clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Women older than 50 years with a unilateral distal radius fracture. Fifty-one participants were randomized and 39 participants were included in the final data analysis.
INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized to standard rehabilitation (Control) or standard rehabilitation plus strength training (Train). Standard rehabilitation included forearm casting for 40.4±6.2 days and hand exercises for the fractured extremity. Nonfractured hand strength training for the training group began immediately postfracture and was conducted at home 3 times/week for 26 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was peak force (handgrip dynamometer). Secondary outcomes were ROM (flexion/extension; supination/pronation) via goniometer and the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation questionnaire score for the fractured arm.
RESULTS: For the fractured hand, the training group (17.3±7.4kg) was significantly stronger than the control group (11.8±5.8kg) at 12 weeks postfracture (P<.017). There were no significant strength differences between the training and control groups at 9 (12.5±8.2kg; 11.3±6.9kg) or 26 weeks (23.0±7.6kg; 19.6±5.5kg) postfracture, respectively. Fractured hand ROM showed that the training group had significantly improved wrist flexion/extension (100.5°±19.2°) than the control group (80.2°±18.7°) at 12 weeks postfracture (P<.017). There were no significant differences between the training and control groups for flexion/extension ROM at 9 (78.0°±20.7°; 81.7°±25.7°) or 26 weeks (104.4°±15.5°; 106.0°±26.5°) or supination/pronation ROM at 9 (153.9°±23.9°; 151.8°±33.0°), 12 (170.9°±9.3°; 156.7°±20.8°) or 26 weeks (169.4°±11.9°; 162.8°±18.1°), respectively. There were no significant differences in Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation questionnaire scores between the training and control groups at 9 (54.2±39.0; 65.2±28.9), 12 (36.4±37.2; 46.2±35.3), or 26 weeks (23.6±25.6; 19.4±16.5), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Strength training for the nonfractured limb after a distal radius fracture was associated with improved strength and ROM in the fractured limb at 12 weeks postfracture. These results have important implications for rehabilitation strategies after unilateral injuries.
Copyright © 2013 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23529145     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  23 in total

Review 1.  Role of the mirror-neuron system in cross-education.

Authors:  Tjerk Zult; Glyn Howatson; Endre E Kádár; Jonathan P Farthing; Tibor Hortobágyi
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Cross-education: effects of age on rapid and maximal voluntary contractile characteristics in males.

Authors:  Garrett M Hester; Mitchel A Magrini; Ryan J Colquhoun; Alejandra Barrera-Curiel; Carlos A Estrada; Alex A Olmos; Alyssa R Bailly; Phuong L Ha; Jason M DeFreitas
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  The time course of cross-education during short-term isometric strength training.

Authors:  Joshua C Carr; Xin Ye; Matt S Stock; Michael G Bemben; Jason M DeFreitas
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 4.  Effectiveness of Occupational Therapy Interventions for Adults With Musculoskeletal Conditions of the Forearm, Wrist, and Hand: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Shawn C Roll; Mark E Hardison
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb

Review 5.  Contralateral Effects After Unilateral Strength Training: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Training Loads.

Authors:  Rafel Cirer-Sastre; Jose V Beltrán-Garrido; Francisco Corbi
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 6.  Determining the potential sites of neural adaptation to cross-education: implications for the cross-education of muscle strength.

Authors:  Ashlyn K Frazer; Alan J Pearce; Glyn Howatson; Kevin Thomas; Stuart Goodall; Dawson J Kidgell
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Mirror illusion reduces motor cortical inhibition in the ipsilateral primary motor cortex during forceful unilateral muscle contractions.

Authors:  Tjerk Zult; Stuart Goodall; Kevin Thomas; Tibor Hortobágyi; Glyn Howatson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Hand and Wrist Trauma: Is There Sufficient Evidence of Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness?

Authors:  Peter Jonathan Dacombe; Rouin Amirfeyz; Tim Davis
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2016-01-13

9.  Cross-education of muscular strength following unilateral resistance training: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  A Manca; D Dragone; Z Dvir; Franca Deriu
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Unilateral strength training leads to muscle-specific sparing effects during opposite homologous limb immobilization.

Authors:  Justin W Andrushko; Joel L Lanovaz; Kelsey M Björkman; Saija A Kontulainen; Jonathan P Farthing
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2017-12-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.