Literature DB >> 23529144

Rasch analysis staging methodology to classify upper extremity movement impairment after stroke.

Michelle L Woodbury1, Craig A Velozo, Lorie G Richards, Pamela W Duncan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To define Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) cutoff scores that demarcate 1 level of upper extremity (UE) impairment from another, and describe motor behaviors for each category in terms of expected FMA-UE item performance.
DESIGN: Analysis of existing FMA-UE data.
SETTING: University research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Persons (N=512) 0 to 145 days poststroke, 42 to 90 years of age. INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: An item response Rasch analysis staging method was used to calculate cutoff scores, which were defined as the Rasch-Andrich threshold values of 2 criterion FMA-UE items derived from an analysis of this sample. The analysis enabled conversion of cutoff scores, in logit units, to FMA-UE points assessed on 30 FMA-UE voluntary movement items (60 possible points).
RESULTS: The boundary between severe and moderate impairment was defined as -1.59 ± .27 logits or 19 ± 2 points; and between moderate and mild impairment was defined as 2.44 ± .27 logits or 47 ± 2 points. A description of expected performance in each impairment level shows that patients with severe impairment exhibited some distal movements, and patients with mild impairment had difficulties with some proximal movements.
CONCLUSIONS: The cutoff scores, which link to a description of specific movements a patient can, can partially, and cannot perform, may enable formation of heterogeneous patient groups, advance efforts to identify specific movement therapy targets, and define treatment response in terms of specific movement that changed or did not change with therapy.
Copyright © 2013 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FMA-UE; Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity; IRT; Rehabilitation; Stroke; UE; Upper extremity; item response theory; upper extremity

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23529144     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  53 in total

1.  A Rehabilitation First-Tournament Between Teams of Nursing Home Residents with Chronic Stroke.

Authors:  Gregory House; Grigore Burdea; Kevin Polistico; Namrata Grampurohit; Doru Roll; Frank Damiani; Samantha Keeler; Jasdeep Hundal
Journal:  Games Health J       Date:  2016-01-07

2.  Nerve Stimulation Enhances Task-Oriented Training for Moderate-to-Severe Hemiparesis 3-12 Months After Stroke: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Cheryl Carrico; Philip M Westgate; Elizabeth Salmon Powell; Kenneth C Chelette; Laurie Nichols; L Creed Pettigrew; Lumy Sawaki
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.159

3.  Stimulation targeting higher motor areas in stroke rehabilitation: A proof-of-concept, randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled study of effectiveness and underlying mechanisms.

Authors:  David A Cunningham; Nicole Varnerin; Andre Machado; Corin Bonnett; Daniel Janini; Sarah Roelle; Kelsey Potter-Baker; Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; Xiaofeng Wang; Guang Yue; Ela B Plow
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.406

4.  Functional Deficits in the Less-Impaired Arm of Stroke Survivors Depend on Hemisphere of Damage and Extent of Paretic Arm Impairment.

Authors:  Candice Maenza; David C Good; Carolee J Winstein; David A Wagstaff; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 3.919

5.  The probability of choosing both hands depends on an interaction between motor capacity and limb-specific control in chronic stroke.

Authors:  Rini Varghese; Jason J Kutch; Nicolas Schweighofer; Carolee J Winstein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  TheraBracelet Stimulation During Task-Practice Therapy to Improve Upper Extremity Function After Stroke: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Na J Seo; Michelle L Woodbury; Leonardo Bonilha; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan; Steven A Kautz; Ryan J Downey; Blair H S Dellenbach; Abigail W Lauer; Caroline M Roark; Lauren E Landers; Sarah K Phillips; Amanda A Vatinno
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2019-03-01

7.  Interpreting Action Research Arm Test Assessment Scores to Plan Treatment.

Authors:  Emily S Grattan; Craig A Velozo; Elizabeth R Skidmore; Stephen J Page; Michelle L Woodbury
Journal:  OTJR (Thorofare N J)       Date:  2018-02-15

8.  Predictors of Arm Nonuse in Chronic Stroke: A Preliminary Investigation.

Authors:  Laurel J Buxbaum; Rini Varghese; Harrison Stoll; Carolee J Winstein
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.919

9.  Rasch Analysis of the Wrist and Hand Fugl-Meyer: Dimensionality and Item-Level Characteristics.

Authors:  Andrew C Persch; P Cristian Gugiu; Craig A Velozo; Stephen J Page
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.649

10.  Functional Test of the Hemiparetic Upper Extremity: A Rasch Analysis With Theoretical Implications.

Authors:  Veronica T Rowe; Carolee J Winstein; Steven L Wolf; Michelle L Woodbury
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.966

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.