Chain-of-state methods are becoming important tools in studying the chemical reaction mechanisms, especially for biomacromolecules. In this article, three chain-of-state methods, nudged elastic band (NEB) method and the replica path method with restraints or constraints, were tested and compared using three model systems with various sizes and at different levels of theory: alanine dipeptide isomerization, β-alanine intramolecular condensation, and the matrix metalloproteinase 2 inhibition mechanism. The levels of theory used to describe the three model systems include molecular mechanics (MM), quantum mechanics (QM), and combined quantum mechanics and molecular mechanics (QM/MM). All three methods could correctly determine a reaction path with reasonable estimation of reaction barriers in most cases. The RMSD measurement with additional weighting schemes provides practically infinite choices of reaction coordinates to describe the reaction progress. These findings demonstrate that the chain-of-state methods are powerful tools when being used carefully to generate a plausible reaction mechanism with full pathway for complex systems at an affordable computational cost.
Chain-of-state methods are becoming important tools in studying the chemical reaction mechanisms, especially for biomacromolecules. In this article, three chain-of-state methods, nudged elastic band (NEB) method and the replica path method with restraints or constraints, were tested and compared using three model systems with various sizes and at different levels of theory: alanine dipeptide isomerization, β-n class="Chemical">alanine intramolecular condensation, and the matrix metalloproteinase 2 inhibition mechanism. The levels of theory used to describe the three model systems include molecular mechanics (MM), quantum mechanics (QM), and combined quantum mechanics and molecular mechanics (QM/MM). All three methods could correctly determine a reaction path with reasonable estimation of reaction barriers in most cases. The RMSD measurement with additional weighting schemes provides practically infinite choices of reaction coordinates to describe the reaction progress. These findings demonstrate that the chain-of-state methods are powerful tools when being used carefully to generate a plausible reaction mechanism with full pathway for complex systems at an affordable computational cost.
Authors: Yihan Shao; Laszlo Fusti Molnar; Yousung Jung; Jörg Kussmann; Christian Ochsenfeld; Shawn T Brown; Andrew T B Gilbert; Lyudmila V Slipchenko; Sergey V Levchenko; Darragh P O'Neill; Robert A DiStasio; Rohini C Lochan; Tao Wang; Gregory J O Beran; Nicholas A Besley; John M Herbert; Ching Yeh Lin; Troy Van Voorhis; Siu Hung Chien; Alex Sodt; Ryan P Steele; Vitaly A Rassolov; Paul E Maslen; Prakashan P Korambath; Ross D Adamson; Brian Austin; Jon Baker; Edward F C Byrd; Holger Dachsel; Robert J Doerksen; Andreas Dreuw; Barry D Dunietz; Anthony D Dutoi; Thomas R Furlani; Steven R Gwaltney; Andreas Heyden; So Hirata; Chao-Ping Hsu; Gary Kedziora; Rustam Z Khalliulin; Phil Klunzinger; Aaron M Lee; Michael S Lee; Wanzhen Liang; Itay Lotan; Nikhil Nair; Baron Peters; Emil I Proynov; Piotr A Pieniazek; Young Min Rhee; Jim Ritchie; Edina Rosta; C David Sherrill; Andrew C Simmonett; Joseph E Subotnik; H Lee Woodcock; Weimin Zhang; Alexis T Bell; Arup K Chakraborty; Daniel M Chipman; Frerich J Keil; Arieh Warshel; Warren J Hehre; Henry F Schaefer; Jing Kong; Anna I Krylov; Peter M W Gill; Martin Head-Gordon Journal: Phys Chem Chem Phys Date: 2006-06-12 Impact factor: 3.676
Authors: B R Brooks; C L Brooks; A D Mackerell; L Nilsson; R J Petrella; B Roux; Y Won; G Archontis; C Bartels; S Boresch; A Caflisch; L Caves; Q Cui; A R Dinner; M Feig; S Fischer; J Gao; M Hodoscek; W Im; K Kuczera; T Lazaridis; J Ma; V Ovchinnikov; E Paci; R W Pastor; C B Post; J Z Pu; M Schaefer; B Tidor; R M Venable; H L Woodcock; X Wu; W Yang; D M York; M Karplus Journal: J Comput Chem Date: 2009-07-30 Impact factor: 3.376
Authors: K Vanommeslaeghe; E Hatcher; C Acharya; S Kundu; S Zhong; J Shim; E Darian; O Guvench; P Lopes; I Vorobyov; A D Mackerell Journal: J Comput Chem Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 3.376
Authors: David K Wolfe; Joseph R Persichetti; Ajeet K Sharma; Phillip S Hudson; H Lee Woodcock; Edward P O'Brien Journal: J Chem Theory Comput Date: 2020-02-17 Impact factor: 6.006