Literature DB >> 23524529

Preservation of sperm of cancer patients: extent of use and pregnancy outcome in a tertiary infertility center.

Amnon Botchan1, Shiri Karpol, Ofer Lehavi, Gedalia Paz, Sandra E Kleiman, Leah Yogev, Haim Yavetz, Ron Hauser.   

Abstract

Sperm cryopreservation is the best modality to ensure future fertility for males diagnosed with cancer. The extent to which cryopreserved sperm is actually used for impregnation, the fertility treatment options that are available and the success rates of these treatments have not been investigated in depth. The medical records of 682 patients who cryopreserved sperm cells due to cancer treatment were analyzed. Seventy of these patients withdrew their frozen sperm for fertility treatments over a 20-year period (most within the first 4 years after cryopreservation). Sperm quality of different malignancies and outcomes of assisted reproduction treatment (ART) for pregnancy achievement in relation to the type of treatment and the type of malignancy were evaluated. The results showed that the rate of using cryo-thawed sperm from cancer patients for fertility treatments in our unit was 10.3%. Sperm quality indices differed between different types of malignancies, with the poorest quality measured in testicular cancer. Conception was achieved in 46 of the 184 ART cycles (25%), and resulted in 36 deliveries. The use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) methodology yielded a significantly higher pregnancy rate (37.4%) than intrauterine insemination (IUI; 11.5%) and was similar to other groups of infertile couples using these modalities. In vitro fertilization (IVF) failed to produce pregnancies. In conclusion, the rate of use of cryopresseved sperm in cancer patients is relatively low (10.3%). Achievement of pregnancies by ICSI presents the best option but when there are enough stored sperm samples and adequate quality, IUI can be employed. Cryopreservation is nevertheless the best option to preserve future fertility potential and hope for cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23524529      PMCID: PMC3739646          DOI: 10.1038/aja.2013.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Androl        ISSN: 1008-682X            Impact factor:   3.285


  33 in total

Review 1.  Cancer and male infertility.

Authors:  A Giwercman; P M Petersen
Journal:  Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2000-09

2.  Spontaneous DNA fragmentation in swim-up selected human spermatozoa during long term incubation.

Authors:  Monica Muratori; Mario Maggi; Silvia Spinelli; Erminio Filimberti; Gianni Forti; Elisabetta Baldi
Journal:  J Androl       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr

Review 3.  Testicular function following chemotherapy.

Authors:  S J Howell; S M Shalet
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 15.610

4.  Characteristics of cryopreserved semen from men with lymphoma.

Authors:  J Hallak; A M Mahran; A Agarwal
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Long-term outcomes of elective human sperm cryostorage.

Authors:  S Kelleher; S M Wishart; P Y Liu; L Turner; I Di Pierro; A J Conway; D J Handelsman
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Sperm cryopreservation in patients with testicular cancer.

Authors:  J Hallak; P N Kolettis; V S Sekhon; A J Thomas; A Agarwal
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  High risk of infertility and long term gonadal damage in males treated with high dose cyclophosphamide for sarcoma during childhood.

Authors:  L B Kenney; M R Laufer; F D Grant; H Grier; L Diller
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Fertility after cancer: a prospective review of assisted reproductive outcome with banked semen specimens.

Authors:  Ashok Agarwal; Pavithra Ranganathan; Namita Kattal; Fabio Pasqualotto; Jorge Hallak; Saba Khayal; Edward Mascha
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 9.  Male fertility-implications of anticancer treatment and strategies to mitigate gonadotoxicity.

Authors:  Ahmed M Ragheb; Edmund S Sabanegh
Journal:  Anticancer Agents Med Chem       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.505

10.  Sperm banking and rate of assisted reproduction treatment: insights from a 15-year cryopreservation program for male cancer patients.

Authors:  Guido Ragni; Edgardo Somigliana; Liliana Restelli; Roberta Salvi; Mariangela Arnoldi; Alessio Paffoni
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  15 in total

1.  Testicular sperm extraction and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome in cancer survivors with no available cryopreserved sperm.

Authors:  Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti; Luciano Negri; Annamaria Baggiani; Emanuela Morenghi; Elena Albani; Carola Maria Conca Dioguardi; Cristina Specchia; Pasquale Patrizio
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Delayed childbearing and female ageing impair assisted reproductive technology outcome in survivors of male haematological cancers.

Authors:  Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti; Luciano Negri; Annamaria Baggiani; Emanuela Morenghi; Elena Albani; Valentina Parini; Luca Cafaro; Carola Maria Conca Dioguardi; Amalia Cesana; Antonella Smeraldi; Armando Santoro
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Assisted reproductive outcomes of male cancer survivors.

Authors:  Ainhoa García; María Belén Herrero; Hananel Holzer; Togas Tulandi; Peter Chan
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 4.  Reproductive outcomes following a stem cell transplant for a haematological malignancy in female cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Brigitte Gerstl; Elizabeth Sullivan; Jana Koch; Handan Wand; Angela Ives; Richard Mitchell; Nada Hamad; Antoinette Anazodo
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  New Promising Strategies in Oncofertility.

Authors:  Janella N Hudson; Nathanael B Stanley; Leena Nahata; Meghan Bowman-Curci; Gwendolyn P Quinn
Journal:  Expert Rev Qual Life Cancer Care       Date:  2017-03-28

6.  The Landscape of Coverage for Fertility Preservation in Male Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Molly Benoit; Kelly Chiles; Michael Hsieh
Journal:  Urol Pract       Date:  2017-03-27

Review 7.  Fertility preservation of patients with testicular cancer.

Authors:  Itsuto Hamano; Shingo Hatakeyama; Chikara Ohyama
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2017-05-18

8.  Live birth rate after use of cryopreserved oocytes or embryos at the time of cancer diagnosis in female survivors: a retrospective study of ten years of experience.

Authors:  Charlotte Sonigo; Nelly Frydman; Anne Mayeur; Vincent Puy; Victoria Windal; Laetitia Hesters; Vanessa Gallot; Alexandra Benoit; Michael Grynberg
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.357

Review 9.  Fatherhood and Sperm DNA Damage in Testicular Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Donatella Paoli; Francesco Pallotti; Andrea Lenzi; Francesco Lombardo
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 5.555

10.  To What Extent Are Cryopreserved Sperm and Testicular Biopsy Samples Used in Assisted Reproduction?

Authors:  Bernd Rosenbusch
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.