Literature DB >> 23524364

Reaction time in the agility test under simulated competitive and noncompetitive conditions.

Erika Zemková1, Tomáš Vilman, Zuzana Kováčiková, Dušan Hamar.   

Abstract

The study evaluates a reaction time in the Agility Test under simulated competitive and noncompetitive conditions. A group of 16 fit men performed, in random order, 2 versions of the Agility Test: non-competitive Agility Single and Agility Dual in form of simulated competition. In both cases, subjects had to touch, as fast as possible, with either the left or the right foot 1 of 4 mats located in 4 corners outside of an 80 cm square. Mats had to be touched in accordance with the location of the stimulus in one of the corners of the screen. The test consisted of 20 visual stimuli with random generation of their location on the screen and time generation from 500 to 2,500 milliseconds. The result was total reaction time (RT) for all 20 reactions measured by a PC-based system FiTRO Agility Check. Results showed significantly (p < 0.01) better RT in the Agility Dual than in the Agility Single Test (690.6 ± 83.8 milliseconds and 805.8 ± 101.1 milliseconds, respectively). Further comparisons of RT under noncompetitive and simulated competitive conditions for the best 8 subjects proceeded in the second match showed a decrease from 781.3 ± 111.2 milliseconds to 693.6 ± 97.8 milliseconds in the first match and to 637.0 ± 53.0 milliseconds in the second match. It may be concluded that RT is better when the Agility Test is performed in simulated competitive than noncompetitive conditions. The Agility Test in form of competition may be used for children and young athletes to enhance their attention level and motivation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23524364     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182903222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  4 in total

1.  Reliability, Validity and Usefulness of a New Response Time Test for Agility-Based Sports: A Simple vs. Complex Motor Task.

Authors:  Haris Pojskic; Jeffrey Pagaduan; Edin Uzicanin; Vlatko Separovic; Miodrag Spasic; Nikola Foretic; Damir Sekulic
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Aerobic-Strength Exercise Improves Metabolism and Clinical State in Parkinson's Disease Patients.

Authors:  Patrik Krumpolec; Silvia Vallova; Lucia Slobodova; Veronika Tirpakova; Matej Vajda; Martin Schon; Radka Klepochova; Zuzana Janakova; Igor Straka; Stanislav Sutovsky; Peter Turcani; Jan Cvecka; Ladislav Valkovic; Chia-Liang Tsai; Martin Krssak; Peter Valkovic; Milan Sedliak; Barbara Ukropcova; Jozef Ukropec
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 3.  Change of Direction Assessment Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Review of Current Practice and Considerations to Enhance Practical Application.

Authors:  Joao Beleboni Marques; Darren James Paul; Phil Graham-Smith; Paul James Read
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 4.  Sport-Specific Assessment of the Effectiveness of Neuromuscular Training in Young Athletes.

Authors:  Erika Zemková; Dušan Hamar
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 4.566

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.