Literature DB >> 23523651

Transcorneal electrical stimulation alters morphology and survival of retinal ganglion cells after optic nerve damage.

Petra Henrich-Noack1, Nadine Voigt, Sylvia Prilloff, Anton Fedorov, Bernhard A Sabel.   

Abstract

Traumatic optic nerve injury leads to retrograde death of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), but transcorneal electrical stimulation (TES) can increase the cell survival rate. To understand the mechanisms and to further define the TES-induced effects we monitored in living animals RGC morphology and survival after optic nerve crush (ONC) in real time by using in vivo confocal neuroimaging (ICON) of the retina. ONC was performed in rats and ICON was performed before crush and on post-lesion days 3, 7 and 15 which allowed us to repeatedly record RGC number and size. TES or sham-stimulation were performed immediately after the crush and on post-injury day 11. Three days after ONC we detected a higher percentage of surviving RGCs in the TES group as compared to sham-treated controls. However, the difference was below significance level on day 7 and disappeared completely by day 15. The death rate was more variable amongst the TES-treated rats than in the control group. Morphological analysis revealed that average cell size changed significantly in the control group but not in stimulated animals and the morphological alterations of surviving neurons were smaller in TES-treated compared to control cells. In conclusion, TES delays post-traumatic cell death significantly. Moreover, we found "responder animals" which also benefited in the long-term from the treatment. Our in vivo cellular imaging results provide evidence that TES reduces ONC-associated neuronal swelling and shrinkage especially in RGCs which survived long-term. Further studies are now needed to determine the differences of responders vs. non-responders.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23523651     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.03.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  21 in total

1.  Toxicity of polymeric nanoparticles in vivo and in vitro.

Authors:  Nadine Voigt; Petra Henrich-Noack; Sarah Kockentiedt; Werner Hintz; Jürgen Tomas; Bernhard A Sabel
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 2.  Using Electrical Stimulation to Enhance the Efficacy of Cell Transplantation Therapies for Neurodegenerative Retinal Diseases: Concepts, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Abby Leigh Manthey; Wei Liu; Zhi Xin Jiang; Marcus Hiu Kong Lee; Jian Ji; Kwok-Fai So; Jimmy Shiu Ming Lai; Vincent Wing Hong Lee; Kin Chiu
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  A nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist prevents loss of retinal ganglion cells in a glaucoma model.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Iwamoto; Patrick Birkholz; Austin Schipper; David Mata; David M Linn; Cindy L Linn
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Randomized controlled trial of electro-stimulation therapies to modulate retinal blood flow and visual function in retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Ava K Bittner; Kenneth Seger; Rachel Salveson; Samantha Kayser; Natalia Morrison; Patricia Vargas; Deborah Mendelsohn; Jorge Han; Hua Bi; Gislin Dagnelie; Alexandra Benavente; Jessica Ramella-Roman
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 3.761

5.  Whole-eye electrical stimulation therapy preserves visual function and structure in P23H-1 rats.

Authors:  Adam M Hanif; Moon K Kim; Joel G Thomas; Vincent T Ciavatta; Micah Chrenek; John R Hetling; Machelle T Pardue
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2016-06-18       Impact factor: 3.467

Review 6.  Electrical Stimulation as a Means for Improving Vision.

Authors:  Amer Sehic; Shuai Guo; Kin-Sang Cho; Rima M Corraya; Dong F Chen; Tor P Utheim
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.307

7.  Retinal neurovascular responses to transcorneal electrical stimulation measured with optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Xiaofan Su; Hao Zheng; Qian Li; Pengcheng Sun; Meixuan Zhou; Heng Li; Jiahui Guo; Xinyu Chai; Chuanqing Zhou
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2020-01-20

Review 8.  The transcorneal electrical stimulation as a novel therapeutic strategy against retinal and optic neuropathy: a review of experimental and clinical trials.

Authors:  Ye Tao; Tao Chen; Bei Liu; Li-Qiang Wang; Guang-Hua Peng; Li-Min Qin; Zhong-Jun Yan; Yi-Fei Huang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

9.  [Transcorneal electrical stimulation in primary open angle glaucoma].

Authors:  T Röck; L Naycheva; G Willmann; B Wilhelm; T Peters; E Zrenner; K U Bartz-Schmidt; F Gekeler; A Schatz
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 10.  Neuroprotective strategies for retinal disease.

Authors:  Machelle T Pardue; Rachael S Allen
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 21.198

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.