Literature DB >> 23523362

Clinical trial of a supportive care team for patients with advanced cancer.

Barbara J Daly1, Sara L Douglas, Douglas Gunzler, Amy R Lipson.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Encouraging use of hospice and minimizing the use of cure-oriented aggressive interventions that detract from quality of life in the last month of life are specific targets for improvement in cancer care.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of an interdisciplinary cancer support team (CST) on quality of care and quality of life in patients with advanced cancers.
METHODS: A nonrandomized clinical trial was conducted, comparing outcomes before and after the integration of an interdisciplinary CST in routine care of adults with Stage III or IV lung, gastrointestinal, or gynecologic cancer. In the control arm, patients (n = 332) received usual care; after the initiation of the intervention arm, eligible patients (n = 278) received the CST intervention. The intervention consisted of individualized care coordination, symptom management, education, psychosocial and spiritual supports, and advance care planning throughout the 15-month study period. Quality of end-of-life care was measured through an "aggressiveness of care" index. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) was measured with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General.
RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between groups on specific indicators of quality of care. Surviving subjects with higher survival expectancy (who also reported better baseline quality of life) in the intervention arm had the greatest improvement in HRQOL scores, compared with the other three groupings of survival expectancy by treatment group (high vs. low by intervention vs. control) (P = 0.044).
CONCLUSION: Individually tailored supportive services from an interdisciplinary team are associated with improved HRQOL in some patients. This has implications for the potential benefits that can be accrued from providing intensive support to all patients, even those who may appear to be at less risk for distress. There also are important methodological considerations in using aggressiveness of care indices as a measure of quality of care.
Copyright © 2013 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Supportive cancer care; aggressiveness of care index; palliative care in cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23523362      PMCID: PMC3715594          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  9 in total

1.  Evaluating claims-based indicators of the intensity of end-of-life cancer care.

Authors:  Craig C Earle; Bridget A Neville; Mary Beth Landrum; Jeffrey M Souza; Jane C Weeks; Susan D Block; Eva Grunfeld; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 2.038

Review 2.  Reliability across studies from the functional assessment of cancer therapy-general (FACT-G) and its subscales: a reliability generalization.

Authors:  David Victorson; Joshua Barocas; Juliette Song; David Cella
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer S Temel; Joseph A Greer; Alona Muzikansky; Emily R Gallagher; Sonal Admane; Vicki A Jackson; Constance M Dahlin; Craig D Blinderman; Juliet Jacobsen; William F Pirl; J Andrew Billings; Thomas J Lynch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Availability and integration of palliative care at US cancer centers.

Authors:  David Hui; Ahmed Elsayem; Maxine De la Cruz; Ann Berger; Donna S Zhukovsky; Shana Palla; Avery Evans; Nada Fadul; J Lynn Palmer; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Effect of palliative care services on the aggressiveness of end-of-life care in the Veteran's Affairs cancer population.

Authors:  Wilson I Gonsalves; Tsewang Tashi; Jairam Krishnamurthy; Tracy Davies; Stephanie Ortman; Ramya Thota; Ibrahim Aldoss; Ashwin Ganta; Mudappa Kalaiah; Neha Didwaniya; Catherine Eberle; Apar K Ganti; Peter T Silberstein; Shanmuga Subbiah
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 2.947

6.  Effects of a palliative care intervention on clinical outcomes in patients with advanced cancer: the Project ENABLE II randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Marie Bakitas; Kathleen Doyle Lyons; Mark T Hegel; Stefan Balan; Frances C Brokaw; Janette Seville; Jay G Hull; Zhongze Li; Tor D Tosteson; Ira R Byock; Tim A Ahles
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Trends in the aggressiveness of cancer care near the end of life.

Authors:  Craig C Earle; Bridget A Neville; Mary Beth Landrum; John Z Ayanian; Susan D Block; Jane C Weeks
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Aggressiveness of cancer care near the end of life: is it a quality-of-care issue?

Authors:  Craig C Earle; Mary Beth Landrum; Jeffrey M Souza; Bridget A Neville; Jane C Weeks; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-10       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Cost savings associated with US hospital palliative care consultation programs.

Authors:  R Sean Morrison; Joan D Penrod; J Brian Cassel; Melissa Caust-Ellenbogen; Ann Litke; Lynn Spragens; Diane E Meier
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-09-08
  9 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  Reviewing cancer care team effectiveness.

Authors:  Stephen H Taplin; Sallie Weaver; Eduardo Salas; Veronica Chollette; Heather M Edwards; Suanna S Bruinooge; Michael P Kosty
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 2.  Respecting the spiritual side of advanced cancer care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Katherine M Piderman; Simon Kung; Sarah M Jenkins; Terin T Euerle; Timothy J Yoder; Gracia M Kwete; Maria I Lapid
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 3.  Multicomponent Palliative Care Interventions in Advanced Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Veerawat Phongtankuel; Lauren Meador; Ronald D Adelman; Jordan Roberts; Charles R Henderson; Sonal S Mehta; Tessa Del Carmen; M C Reid
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  Relationship Between Physical and Psychological Status of Cancer Patients and Caregivers.

Authors:  Sara L Douglas; Barbara J Daly; Amy R Lipson
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.967

5.  Effect of an integrated cancer support team on caregiver satisfaction with end-of-life care.

Authors:  Sara L Douglas; Barbara J Daly
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Preference for Palliative Care in Cancer Patients: Are Men and Women Alike?

Authors:  Fahad Saeed; Michael Hoerger; Sally A Norton; Elizabeth Guancial; Ronald M Epstein; Paul R Duberstein
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.612

7.  Differences in Predictions for Survival and Expectations for Goals of Care between Physicians and Family Surrogate Decision Makers of Chronically Critically Ill Adults.

Authors:  Sara L Douglas; Barbara J Daly; Amy R Lipson
Journal:  Res Rev J Nurs Health Sci       Date:  2017-11-24

Review 8.  Conceptualizing and Counting Discretionary Utilization in the Final 100 Days of Life: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Paul R Duberstein; Michael Chen; Michael Hoerger; Ronald M Epstein; Laura M Perry; Sule Yilmaz; Fahad Saeed; Supriya G Mohile; Sally A Norton
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 3.612

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.