Literature DB >> 23523306

Health-related quality of life and functionality after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Roberto Castricini1, Giorgio Gasparini, Francesco Di Luggo, Massimo De Benedetto, Marco De Gori, Olimpio Galasso.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Modern semiconstrained reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has shown a great improvement in function and range of motion (ROM) in different etiologies, including revision surgery, sequelae of fractures, or tumors. Few studies have evaluated RSA for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis, massive rotator cuff tear, or cuff tear arthropathy excluding any other shoulder disease, and data on patients' quality of life after this surgery are lacking.
METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 80 patients were evaluated after an RSA for either primary osteoarthritis, massive rotator cuff tear, or cuff tear arthropathy with the Constant-Murley score (CMS), ROM, and Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). A radiologic assessment was performed preoperatively and postoperatively in 62 of these patients.
RESULTS: At a mean 5-year follow-up, the cumulative survival rate was 97.3% and significant improvements in the CMS and ROM were observed when compared with the baseline values. The CMS was 93.2% of the sex- and age-matched normal values. The postoperative SF-36 scores showed no significant differences compared with normative data. Younger patients and subjects with worse preoperative conditions achieved the greatest benefit after RSA. The length of follow-up was found to be associated with the severity of scapular notching.
CONCLUSIONS: This study introduces new predictors for surgical outcomes, and it shows that patients who had undergone RSA a mean of 5 years earlier exhibit similar functionality and health-related quality of life with respect to healthy controls. Physicians should consider these results when discussing the outcomes of this surgery with patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Case series, treatment study.
Copyright © 2013 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Case Series; Constant-Murley score; Level IV; Reverse shoulder arthroplasty; SF-36; Treatment Study; cuff tear arthropathy; massive rotator cuff tear; outcome predictors; primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23523306     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.01.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  18 in total

1.  Expanding roles for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peter N Chalmers; Jay D Keener
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

2.  Novel approaches to objectively assess shoulder function.

Authors:  Wendy J Hurd; Melissa M Morrow; Emily J Miller; Robert A Adams; John W Sperling; Kenton R Kaufman
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Arthroscopic Partial Repair of Irreparable, Massive Rotator Cuff Tears.

Authors:  Roberto Castricini; Olimpio Galasso; Daria Anna Riccelli; Filippo Familiari; Massimo De Benedetto; Nicola Orlando; Giorgio Gasparini
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-01-30

4.  Tenodesis is not superior to tenotomy in the treatment of the long head of biceps tendon lesions.

Authors:  Roberto Castricini; Filippo Familiari; Marco De Gori; Daria Anna Riccelli; Massimo De Benedetto; Nicola Orlando; Olimpio Galasso; Giorgio Gasparini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Patient-Reported and Objectively Measured Function Before and After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Wendy J Hurd; Melissa M Morrow; Emily J Miller; Robert A Adams; John W Sperling; Kenton R Kaufman
Journal:  J Geriatr Phys Ther       Date:  2018 Jul/Sep       Impact factor: 3.381

6.  I.S.Mu.L.T - Rotator Cuff Tears Guidelines.

Authors:  Francesco Oliva; Eleonora Piccirilli; Michela Bossa; Alessio Giai Via; Alessandra Colombo; Claudio Chillemi; Giuseppe Gasparre; Leonardo Pellicciari; Edoardo Franceschetti; Clelia Rugiero; Alessandro Scialdoni; Filippo Vittadini; Paola Brancaccio; Domenico Creta; Angelo Del Buono; Raffaele Garofalo; Francesco Franceschi; Antonio Frizziero; Asmaa Mahmoud; Giovanni Merolla; Simone Nicoletti; Marco Spoliti; Leonardo Osti; Johnny Padulo; Nicola Portinaro; Gianfranco Tajana; Alex Castagna; Calogero Foti; Stefano Masiero; Giuseppe Porcellini; Umberto Tarantino; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2016-02-13

7.  Reliability of measurements performed on two dimensional and three dimensional computed tomography in glenoid assessment for instability.

Authors:  Anna Maria Kubicka; Jakub Stefaniak; Przemysław Lubiatowski; Jan Długosz; Marcin Dzianach; Marcin Redman; Janusz Piontek; Leszek Romanowski
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  Functional outcomes assessment in shoulder surgery.

Authors:  James D Wylie; James T Beckmann; Erin Granger; Robert Z Tashjian
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-11-18

9.  Predictors of functional outcomes and recurrent shoulder instability after arthroscopic anterior stabilization.

Authors:  Giorgio Gasparini; Massimo De Benedetto; Arcangela Cundari; Marco De Gori; Nicola Orlando; Edward G McFarland; Olimpio Galasso; Roberto Castricini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  The effect of glenosphere size on functional outcome for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  V J Sabesan; D J Lombardo; R Shahriar; G R Petersen-Fitts; J M Wiater
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-02-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.