Literature DB >> 26377097

Predictors of functional outcomes and recurrent shoulder instability after arthroscopic anterior stabilization.

Giorgio Gasparini1, Massimo De Benedetto2, Arcangela Cundari1, Marco De Gori1, Nicola Orlando2, Edward G McFarland3, Olimpio Galasso4, Roberto Castricini2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate what factors might predict the results of arthroscopic stabilization for anterior shoulder instability.
METHODS: One hundred and forty-three patients averaging 25 (15-58) years with traumatic anterior shoulder instability who underwent arthroscopic stabilization were reviewed at a median follow-up of 81 (24-172) months. Sixty-two (56.4 %) individuals were involved in contact sport activities, and there were 40 (30 %) patients who had only one dislocation prior to having surgery. Rowe score was measured preoperatively and at follow-up.
RESULTS: Thirty-three (23.1 %) patients experienced recurrent instability 12 (1-120) months after surgery, and 15 of those underwent further surgery. There was a statistically significant lower risk of failure (p = 0.027) for patients who had a surgical procedure after only one episode of shoulder dislocation. Patients treated after the second or further episode of shoulder dislocation exhibited a mean odds ratio for failure of 3.8 (95 % confidence interval 1.2-11.6, p = 0.044) with regard to first-time dislocators. The Rowe score significantly improved from a preoperative value of 25 (5-55) to a postoperative value of 100 (40-100) (p < 0.001). A significantly higher postoperative Rowe score was found in patients older than 24 years of age at the operation (p = 0.011) and in patients with less than eight dislocations prior to surgery (p = 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that better functional results following arthroscopic stabilization can be expected in patients over 24 years of age and in those with a fewer number of dislocations preoperatively. A lower rate of recurrence can be expected if the patient undergoes surgery after the first episode of dislocation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic study, Level II.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroscopic stabilization; First-time dislocators; Outcome predictors; Shoulder instability

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26377097     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3785-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  39 in total

Review 1.  Anterior instability of the shoulder after trauma.

Authors:  C M Robinson; R J Dobson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-05

2.  Primary repair versus conservative treatment of first-time traumatic anterior dislocation of the shoulder: a randomized study with 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Bent Wulff Jakobsen; Hans Viggo Johannsen; Peter Suder; Jens Ole Søjbjerg
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 3.  Arthroscopic stabilization for first-time versus recurrent shoulder instability.

Authors:  Robert C Grumet; Bernard R Bach; Matthew T Provencher
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  The anterior labroligamentous periosteal sleeve avulsion lesion: a cause of anterior instability of the shoulder.

Authors:  T J Neviaser
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  The Bankart procedure: a long-term end-result study.

Authors:  C R Rowe; D Patel; W W Southmayd
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Quantifying glenoid bone loss arthroscopically in shoulder instability.

Authors:  Stephen S Burkhart; Joe F Debeer; Armin M Tehrany; Peter M Parten
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Prospective evaluation of arthroscopic bankart repairs for anterior instability.

Authors:  James E Voos; Ryan W Livermore; Brian T Feeley; David W Altchek; Riley J Williams; Russell F Warren; Frank A Cordasco; Answorth A Allen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Long-term results after arthroscopic shoulder stabilization using suture anchors: an 8- to 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Just A van der Linde; Derk A van Kampen; Caroline B Terwee; Lea M Dijksman; G Kleinjan; W Jaap Willems
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  The instability severity index score. A simple pre-operative score to select patients for arthroscopic or open shoulder stabilisation.

Authors:  F Balg; P Boileau
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-11

10.  Risk factors for shoulder re-dislocation after arthroscopic Bankart repair.

Authors:  Hideaki Shibata; Masafumi Gotoh; Yasuhiro Mitsui; Yoshihiro Kai; Hidehiro Nakamura; Tomonoshin Kanazawa; Takahiro Okawa; Fujio Higuchi; Masahiro Shirahama; Naoto Shiba
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 2.359

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Arthroscopic stabilisation for shoulder instability.

Authors:  Konstantinos Fountzoulas; Syed Hassan; Al-Achraf Khoriati; Chu-Hao Chiang; Nicholas Little; Vipul Patel
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-07-17

2.  Instability severity index score values below 7 do not predict recurrence after arthroscopic Bankart repair.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Ruiz Ibán; Cristina Victoria Asenjo Gismero; Santos Moros Marco; Raquel Ruiz Díaz; Teresa Del Olmo Hernández; Gabriel Del Monte Bello; Miguel García Navlet; Jose Luis Ávila Lafuente; Jorge Díaz Heredia
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Tenodesis is not superior to tenotomy in the treatment of the long head of biceps tendon lesions.

Authors:  Roberto Castricini; Filippo Familiari; Marco De Gori; Daria Anna Riccelli; Massimo De Benedetto; Nicola Orlando; Olimpio Galasso; Giorgio Gasparini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Surgical treatment outcomes after primary vs recurrent anterior shoulder instability.

Authors:  Jonathan D Barlow; Timothy Grosel; John Higgins; Joshua S Everhart; Robert A Magnussen
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-10-22

Review 5.  Maximal Medical Improvement Following Shoulder Stabilization Surgery May Require up to 1 Year: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Bhavik H Patel; Yining Lu; Avinesh Agarwalla; Richard N Puzzitiello; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Gregory L Cvetanovich; Jorge Chahla; Brian Forsythe
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2020-09-10

6.  Return to Sports and Recurrences After Arthroscopic Anterior Shoulder Stabilization in Martial Arts Athletes.

Authors:  Maximiliano Ranalletta; Luciano A Rossi; Adrian Sirio; Fernando Diaz Dilernia; Agustin Bertona; Gastón D Maignon; Santiago L Bongiovanni
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-09-13

7.  Trends in Surgical Management of Shoulder Instability.

Authors:  Nicholas A Bonazza; Guodong Liu; Douglas L Leslie; Aman Dhawan
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-06-28

8.  Arthroscopic Bankart Repairs With and Without Remplissage in Recurrent Adolescent Anterior Shoulder Instability With Hill-Sachs Deformity.

Authors:  Jessica L Hughes; Tracey Bastrom; Andrew T Pennock; Eric W Edmonds
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-12-14

9.  Multiple Subscapularis Tendon Sign: A New Risk Factor for Recurrence After Arthroscopic Anterior Shoulder Instability Surgery.

Authors:  Ulunay Kanatli; Mustafa Özer; Mehmet Gem; Burak Yağmur Öztürk; Muhammet Baybars Ataoğlu; Mehmet Çetinkaya; Tacettin Ayanoğlu
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-06-27

Review 10.  High Variability of the Definition of Recurrent Glenohumeral Instability: An Analysis of the Current Literature by a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hassanin Alkaduhimi; James W Connelly; Derek F P van Deurzen; Denise Eygendaal; Michel P J van den Bekerom
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-04-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.