Giorgio Gasparini1, Massimo De Benedetto2, Arcangela Cundari1, Marco De Gori1, Nicola Orlando2, Edward G McFarland3, Olimpio Galasso4, Roberto Castricini2. 1. Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Magna Graecia University, Mater Domini University Hospital, Viale Europa, 88100, Catanzaro, Italy. 2. Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Villa Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy. 3. Division of Shoulder Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. 4. Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Magna Graecia University, Mater Domini University Hospital, Viale Europa, 88100, Catanzaro, Italy. galasso@unicz.it.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate what factors might predict the results of arthroscopic stabilization for anterior shoulder instability. METHODS: One hundred and forty-three patients averaging 25 (15-58) years with traumatic anterior shoulder instability who underwent arthroscopic stabilization were reviewed at a median follow-up of 81 (24-172) months. Sixty-two (56.4 %) individuals were involved in contact sport activities, and there were 40 (30 %) patients who had only one dislocation prior to having surgery. Rowe score was measured preoperatively and at follow-up. RESULTS: Thirty-three (23.1 %) patients experienced recurrent instability 12 (1-120) months after surgery, and 15 of those underwent further surgery. There was a statistically significant lower risk of failure (p = 0.027) for patients who had a surgical procedure after only one episode of shoulder dislocation. Patients treated after the second or further episode of shoulder dislocation exhibited a mean odds ratio for failure of 3.8 (95 % confidence interval 1.2-11.6, p = 0.044) with regard to first-time dislocators. The Rowe score significantly improved from a preoperative value of 25 (5-55) to a postoperative value of 100 (40-100) (p < 0.001). A significantly higher postoperative Rowe score was found in patients older than 24 years of age at the operation (p = 0.011) and in patients with less than eight dislocations prior to surgery (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that better functional results following arthroscopic stabilization can be expected in patients over 24 years of age and in those with a fewer number of dislocations preoperatively. A lower rate of recurrence can be expected if the patient undergoes surgery after the first episode of dislocation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic study, Level II.
PURPOSE: To investigate what factors might predict the results of arthroscopic stabilization for anterior shoulder instability. METHODS: One hundred and forty-three patients averaging 25 (15-58) years with traumatic anterior shoulder instability who underwent arthroscopic stabilization were reviewed at a median follow-up of 81 (24-172) months. Sixty-two (56.4 %) individuals were involved in contact sport activities, and there were 40 (30 %) patients who had only one dislocation prior to having surgery. Rowe score was measured preoperatively and at follow-up. RESULTS: Thirty-three (23.1 %) patients experienced recurrent instability 12 (1-120) months after surgery, and 15 of those underwent further surgery. There was a statistically significant lower risk of failure (p = 0.027) for patients who had a surgical procedure after only one episode of shoulder dislocation. Patients treated after the second or further episode of shoulder dislocation exhibited a mean odds ratio for failure of 3.8 (95 % confidence interval 1.2-11.6, p = 0.044) with regard to first-time dislocators. The Rowe score significantly improved from a preoperative value of 25 (5-55) to a postoperative value of 100 (40-100) (p < 0.001). A significantly higher postoperative Rowe score was found in patients older than 24 years of age at the operation (p = 0.011) and in patients with less than eight dislocations prior to surgery (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that better functional results following arthroscopic stabilization can be expected in patients over 24 years of age and in those with a fewer number of dislocations preoperatively. A lower rate of recurrence can be expected if the patient undergoes surgery after the first episode of dislocation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic study, Level II.
Authors: James E Voos; Ryan W Livermore; Brian T Feeley; David W Altchek; Riley J Williams; Russell F Warren; Frank A Cordasco; Answorth A Allen Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2009-12-22 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Just A van der Linde; Derk A van Kampen; Caroline B Terwee; Lea M Dijksman; G Kleinjan; W Jaap Willems Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2011-07-29 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Miguel Angel Ruiz Ibán; Cristina Victoria Asenjo Gismero; Santos Moros Marco; Raquel Ruiz Díaz; Teresa Del Olmo Hernández; Gabriel Del Monte Bello; Miguel García Navlet; Jose Luis Ávila Lafuente; Jorge Díaz Heredia Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2019-04-06 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Bhavik H Patel; Yining Lu; Avinesh Agarwalla; Richard N Puzzitiello; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Gregory L Cvetanovich; Jorge Chahla; Brian Forsythe Journal: HSS J Date: 2020-09-10
Authors: Maximiliano Ranalletta; Luciano A Rossi; Adrian Sirio; Fernando Diaz Dilernia; Agustin Bertona; Gastón D Maignon; Santiago L Bongiovanni Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2017-09-13
Authors: Ulunay Kanatli; Mustafa Özer; Mehmet Gem; Burak Yağmur Öztürk; Muhammet Baybars Ataoğlu; Mehmet Çetinkaya; Tacettin Ayanoğlu Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2019-06-27
Authors: Hassanin Alkaduhimi; James W Connelly; Derek F P van Deurzen; Denise Eygendaal; Michel P J van den Bekerom Journal: Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Date: 2021-04-06