Literature DB >> 23522938

Patient-reported outcome measures for chronic wounds with particular reference to pressure ulcer research: a systematic review.

Claudia Gorecki1, Jane Nixon, Donna L Lamping, Yasmene Alavi, Julia M Brown.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Pressure ulcers are a major health problem, affect patient psychological, physical and social functioning, and cause significant treatment burden. For comprehensive assessment of the benefits of an intervention, patient-reported evidence of the impact of an intervention on important patient outcomes should be made. We systematically reviewed the quality of life literature on chronic wounds to determine the suitability of generic and chronic wound-specific outcome measures for use in evaluating patient outcomes in pressure ulcer research.
DESIGN: A systematic review of the literature. DATA SOURCES: Searches of eight electronic databases from inception until May 2012 were undertaken. REVIEW
METHODS: Quality of life domains, item content and content relevance were determined for identified outcome measures. The content validity of identified measures was assessed against an empirically derived pressure ulcer-specific conceptual framework.
RESULTS: Three generic and 14 chronic wound measures were identified but no pressure ulcer-specific measures. None of the existing measures cover all quality of life domains important in pressure ulcers. One condition-specific measure, the Venous Leg Ulcer Measure, matched most closely conceptually, but failed to represent three important domains and contained items not specific to pressure ulcers.
CONCLUSIONS: Currently, outcomes important in pressure ulcers are inadequately covered by generic and chronic wound-specific instruments despite similar conceptual models. Highlighted is the need for clear conceptualisation of content as well as determining appropriateness when selecting outcome measures in the future.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health-related quality of life; Nursing assessment; Outcome measurement; Patient-reported outcome measure; Pressure ulcer; Systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23522938     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud        ISSN: 0020-7489            Impact factor:   5.837


  12 in total

1.  Patient education materials on pressure injury prevention in hospitals and health services in Victoria, Australia: Availability and content analysis.

Authors:  Victoria Team; Ayoub Bouguettaya; Catelyn Richards; Louise Turnour; Angela Jones; Helena Teede; Carolina D Weller
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Pressure injury identification, measurement, coding, and reporting: Key challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Carolina D Weller; Esther R Gershenzon; Sue M Evans; Victoria Team; John J McNeil
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 3.  Pressure redistributing static chairs for preventing pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Melanie Stephens; Carol Bartley; Jo C Dumville
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-02-17

4.  Protocol for the mixed-methods development of a concussion-specific health-related quality of life outcome measure based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health.

Authors:  Jacqueline van Ierssel; Heidi Sveistrup; Shawn Marshall
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  A patient-reported pressure ulcer health-related quality of life instrument for use in prevention trials (PU-QOL-P): psychometric evaluation.

Authors:  Claudia Rutherford; Julia M Brown; Isabelle Smith; Elizabeth McGinnis; Lyn Wilson; Rachael Gilberts; Sarah Brown; Susanne Coleman; Howard Collier; Jane Nixon
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 3.186

6.  International study to develop the WOUND-Q patient-reported outcome measure for all types of chronic wounds.

Authors:  Anne F Klassen; Emiel L W G van Haren; Tert C van Alphen; Stefan Cano; Karen M Cross; Anne-Margreet van Dishoeck; Kenneth L Fan; Maarten Michael Hoogbergen; Dennis Orgill; Lotte Poulsen; Jens Ahm Sørensen; Lee Squitieri; Elena Tsangaris; Dalibor Vasilic; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  Development and validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure for patients with pressure ulcers: the PU-QOL instrument.

Authors:  Claudia Gorecki; Julia M Brown; Stefan Cano; Donna L Lamping; Michelle Briggs; Susanne Coleman; Carol Dealey; Elizabeth McGinnis; Andrea E Nelson; Nikki Stubbs; Lyn Wilson; Jane Nixon
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 3.186

8.  Support surfaces for treating pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Elizabeth McInnes; Asmara Jammali-Blasi; Sally Em Bell-Syer; Vannessa Leung
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-11

9.  Using mixed methods to select optimal mode of administration for a patient-reported outcome instrument for people with pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Claudia Rutherford; Jane Nixon; Julia M Brown; Donna L Lamping; Stefan J Cano
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 10.  The quality of systematic reviews of health-related outcome measurement instruments.

Authors:  C B Terwee; C A C Prinsen; M G Ricci Garotti; A Suman; H C W de Vet; L B Mokkink
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.