Literature DB >> 23522891

Characteristics of donors who do or do not return to give blood and barriers to their return.

Anne Wevers1, Daniël H J Wigboldus2, Wim L A M de Kort1, Rick van Baaren2, Ingrid J T Veldhuizen1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the Netherlands about 50% of whole blood donors return to give blood after an invitation to donate. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of donor return behaviour and to gain insight into the barriers to blood donation reported by the donors themselves.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 4,901 whole blood donors were invited to donate in week 39 of 2009. Barriers mentioned by donors who informed the blood bank for not donating were registered for 1 month. Logistic regression analyses assessed relevant characteristics of return behaviour, such as age and blood type, in men and women separately.
RESULTS: Of the invited donors, 55% returned to give a donation, whereas 45% did not return. Male donors were more likely to return when they were older, had a higher previous return rate and had no past deferrals. The same pattern was found among women, but was less strong. The main barriers were: time constraints (35%), preference to postpone donation due to general physical problems although being eligible to donate (29%), and being ineligible to donate due to medical deferral criteria (9%). DISCUSSION: Specific donor characteristics are associated with return behaviour. Not donating due to time constraints could mean that donors do not feel the urgency of donating blood. Interventions targeted to increase commitment among specific donor groups should be tested further.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23522891      PMCID: PMC3934263          DOI: 10.2450/2013.0210-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Transfus        ISSN: 1723-2007            Impact factor:   3.443


  29 in total

1.  Improving blood donor recruitment and retention: integrating theoretical advances from social and behavioral science research agendas.

Authors:  Eamonn Ferguson; Christopher R France; Charles Abraham; Blaine Ditto; Paschal Sheeran
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.157

2.  The consequences of temporary deferral on future whole blood donation.

Authors:  Brian Custer; Artina Chinn; Nora V Hirschler; Michael P Busch; Edward L Murphy
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.157

3.  How barriers to blood donation differ between lapsed donors and non-donors in France.

Authors:  P Duboz; B Cunéo
Journal:  Transfus Med       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 2.019

4.  Exploring the pattern of blood donor beliefs in first-time, novice, and experienced donors: differentiating reluctant altruism, pure altruism, impure altruism, and warm glow.

Authors:  Eamonn Ferguson; Femke Atsma; Wim de Kort; Ingrid Veldhuizen
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 3.157

5.  The effect of short-term, temporary deferral on future blood donation.

Authors:  D Halperin; J Baetens; B Newman
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.157

6.  The effect of whole-blood donor adverse events on blood donor return rates.

Authors:  Bruce H Newman; Daniel T Newman; Raffat Ahmad; Arthur J Roth
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  Temporary deferral and donor return.

Authors:  J A Piliavin
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  1987 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.157

8.  Analysis of donor return behavior. Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study.

Authors:  H E Ownby; F Kong; K Watanabe; Y Tu; C C Nass
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.157

9.  Opinions about donating blood among those who never gave and those who stopped: a focus group assessment.

Authors:  Sunitha M Mathew; Melissa R King; Simone A Glynn; Stephen K Dietz; Scott L Caswell; George B Schreiber
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.157

10.  Adverse reactions, psychological factors, and their effect on donor retention in men and women.

Authors:  Ingrid Veldhuizen; Femke Atsma; Anne van Dongen; Wim de Kort
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 3.157

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Individual, contextual and network characteristics of blood donors and non-donors: a systematic review of recent literature.

Authors:  Tjeerd W Piersma; René Bekkers; Elisabeth F Klinkenberg; Wim L A M De Kort; Eva-Maria Merz
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  Factors Influencing Clinical Follow-Up for Individuals with a Personal History of Breast and/or Ovarian Cancer and Previous Uninformative BRCA1 and BRCA2 Testing.

Authors:  Sarah E Chadwell; Hua He; Sara Knapke; Jaime Lewis; Rebecca Sisson; Jennifer Hopper
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Adverse events and retention of donors of double red cell units by apheresis.

Authors:  Ketevan Keshelashvili; Alix O'meara; Martin Stern; Zuzana Jirout; Vildana Pehlic; Andreas Holbro; Andreas Buser; Jörg Sigle; Laura Infanti
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.443

4.  Effective methods for reactivating inactive blood donors: a stratified randomised controlled study.

Authors:  Jian Ou-Yang; Chun-Hua Bei; Hua-Qin Liang; Bo He; Jin-Yan Chen; Yong-Shui Fu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 5.  Transfusion Medicine and Molecular Genetic Methods.

Authors:  Rozieyati Mohamed Saleh; Zulkafli Zefarina; Nor Fazila Che Mat; Geoffrey Keith Chambers; Hisham Atan Edinur
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2018-05-16

6.  Barriers to blood donation on social media: An analysis of Facebook and Twitter posts.

Authors:  Steven Ramondt; Melissa Zijlstra; Peter Kerkhof; Eva-Maria Merz
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2020-08-08       Impact factor: 3.337

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.