Literature DB >> 23522354

Endothelial keratoplasty: prospective, randomized, masked clinical trial comparing an injector with forceps for tissue insertion.

Mark A Terry1, Michael D Straiko, Jeffrey M Goshe, Neda Shamie, Anand Shah, Asem A Alqudah, David Davis-Boozer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the complications and outcomes of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) when the tissue is either folded and inserted with a forceps or inserted using a platform injector device without folding.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, masked clinical trial.
METHODS: DSAEK was performed in 100 eyes of 79 patients undergoing DSAEK surgery for Fuchs corneal dystrophy. Fifty eyes were randomized to have the donor tissue inserted with Charlie II insertion forceps (Bausch & Lomb Surgical) and 50 eyes were randomized to have the donor tissue inserted with the Neusidl Corneal Inserter (Fischer Surgical Inc). All other steps of the surgical procedure were exactly the same. Surgical problems, postoperative complications, and central endothelial cell density at 6 months were recorded and then measured by a masked observer. The study's main outcome measures were total central endothelial cell density and percentage of donor endothelial cell loss from before surgery to 6 months after surgery and rate of complications (graft dislocation and primary graft failure).
RESULTS: No primary graft failures occurred in either group and only 1 dislocation occurred in the series (Neusidl group). One late failure occurred at 6 months (Neusidl group). There was no difference in the preoperative endothelial cell density between the Neusidl and forceps groups, but there was a higher percentage of cell loss with the Neusidl group (33%) than with the forceps group (25%) at 6 months (P = .017).
CONCLUSIONS: The Neusidl Corneal Inserter yielded a low immediate complication rate for DSAEK surgery for novice and experienced surgeons. Although still at an acceptable level, short-term endothelial survival was significantly worse after Neusidl tissue insertion than that after forceps tissue insertion.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23522354     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.01.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  9 in total

1.  Vulnerability of corneal endothelial cells to mechanical trauma from indentation forces assessed using contact mechanics and fluorescence microscopy.

Authors:  Manuel A Ramirez-Garcia; Yousuf M Khalifa; Mark R Buckley
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 3.467

2.  Donor, Recipient, and Operative Factors Associated with Graft Success in the Cornea Preservation Time Study.

Authors:  Mark A Terry; Anthony J Aldave; Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn; Wendi Liang; Allison R Ayala; Maureen G Maguire; Christopher Croasdale; Yassine J Daoud; Steven P Dunn; Caroline K Hoover; Marian S Macsai; Thomas F Mauger; Sudeep Pramanik; George O D Rosenwasser; Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer; R Doyle Stulting; Alan Sugar; Elmer Y Tu; David D Verdier; Sonia H Yoo; Jonathan H Lass
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Donor, Recipient, and Operative Factors Associated With Increased Endothelial Cell Loss in the Cornea Preservation Time Study.

Authors:  Jonathan H Lass; Beth Ann Benetz; Sanjay V Patel; Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn; Robert O'Brien; Allison R Ayala; Maureen G Maguire; Yassine J Daoud; Mark A Greiner; Sadeer B Hannush; W Barry Lee; Thomas F Mauger; Harry J Menegay; Mark D Mifflin; Michael B Raizman; Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer; Robert L Schultze; Gregory A Schmidt; Alan Sugar; Mark A Terry; David D Verdier
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 7.389

Review 4.  Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Tissue Insertion Devices.

Authors:  Salman Nasir Khan; Panos S Shiakolas; Venkateswara Vinod Mootha
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

Review 5.  Component corneal surgery: An update.

Authors:  Prafulla K Maharana; Pranita Sahay; Deepali Singhal; Itika Garg; Jeewan S Titiyal; Namrata Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 6.  Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Namrata Sharma; Prafulla K Maharana; Shipra Singhi; Neelima Aron; Mukesh Patil
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.848

7.  Clinical outcomes after Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty using donor corneas from children younger than 3 years.

Authors:  Rong-Mei Peng; Yu-Xin Guo; Yuan Qiu; Jing Hong; Ge-Ge Xiao; Hong-Qiang Qu
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.207

8.  Clinical evaluation of a newly developed graft inserter (NS Endo-Inserter) for Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Takeshi Soma; Shizuka Koh; Yoshinori Oie; Kazuichi Maruyama; Motokazu Tsujikawa; Satoshi Kawasaki; Naoyuki Maeda; Kohji Nishida
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-12-21

9.  Clinical Evaluation of the NS Endo-Inserter, a Novel Donor Inserter for Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty.

Authors:  Akira Kobayashi; Hideaki Yokogawa; Natsuko Mori; Tsubasa Nishino; Kazuhisa Sugiyama
Journal:  Case Rep Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.