| Literature DB >> 23519192 |
Adam M Jaros1, Ulrika Rova, Kris A Berglund.
Abstract
Clostridium tyrobutyricum ATCC 25755 is an acidogenic bacterium capable of utilizing xylose for the fermentation production of butyrate. Hot water extraction of hardwood lingocellulose is an efficient method of producing xylose where autohydrolysis of xylan is catalysed by acetate originating from acetyl groups present in hemicellulose. The presence of acetic acid in the hydrolysate might have a severe impact on the subsequent fermentations. In this study the fermentation kinetics of C. tyrobutyricum cultures after being classically adapted for growth at 26.3 g/L acetate equivalents were studied. Analysis of xylose batch fermentations found that even in the presence of high levels of acetate, acetate adapted strains had similar fermentation kinetics as the parental strain cultivated without acetate. The parental strain exposed to acetate at inhibitory conditions demonstrated a pronounced lag phase (over 100 hours) in growth and butyrate production as compared to the adapted strain (25 hour lag) or non-inhibited controls (0 lag). Additional insight into the metabolic pathway of xylose consumption was gained by determining the specific activity of the acetate kinase (AK) enzyme in adapted versus control batches. AK activity was reduced by 63% in the presence of inhibitory levels of acetate, whether or not the culture had been adapted.Entities:
Keywords: Acetate inhibition; Butyrate; Clostridium tyrobutyricum; Hemicellulose utilization; Xylose fermentation
Year: 2013 PMID: 23519192 PMCID: PMC3600123 DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-47
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Figure 1Impact of acetate on xylose consumption, butyric acid production and biomass generation.
Fermentation kinetics ofcultures run in batch with or without selection for acetate tolerance and with or without acetate inhibition
| Sugar | Acetate | Lag time3 | Complete utilization of carbon | Sugar cons4 | Butyrate Yield5 | Final concentration | Specific Growth Rate (μnet)7 | Overall produc.8 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (g/L) | (h) | (h) | (g/L/h) | (mol/mol) | (g/L) | (1/h) | (g/L/h) | ||||
| Butyrate | Acetate | Bio- mass6 | |||||||||
| Glc1 | 0 | non-adapted | 0 | 77 | 1.07 | 0.85 | 25.61 | 8.38 | 3.40 | 0.306 | 0.28 |
| Glc | 26.3 | non-adapted | 94 | 171 | 1.09 | 0.89 | 26.22 | 27.85 | 3.59 | 0.274 | 0.15 |
| Glc | 26.3 | adapted | 0 | 75 | 1.21 | 0.87 | 25.86 | 32.03 | 2.77 | 0.206 | 0.32 |
| Xyl1 | 0 | non-adapted | 0 | 166 | 0.56 | 0.74 | 25.80 | 4.24 | 2.72 | 0.093 | 0.16 |
| Xyl | 26.3 | non-adapted | 102 | 167 | 1.22 | 0.79 | 29.00 | 27.76 | 3.04 | 0.121 | 0.12 |
| Xyl | 26.3 | adapted | 25 | 174 | 0.60 | 0.81 | 28.92 | 24.46 | 2.30 | 0.067 | 0.17 |
1 Glucose and xylose respectively.
2 Whether or not the inoculum had been selectively adapted to 26.3 g/L.
3 Calculated as time until sugar consumption started.
4 Calculated for the linear sugar consumption phase.
5 Yield was calculated as mol butyrate per mol glucose or xylose consumed during fermentation.
6 Calculated as DCW g/L.
7 As determined by the formula μnet (h-1) = (ln(DCWx/DCW0))/(Timex-Time0).
8 Overall productivity calculated from the start of the fermentation until the sugar source were completed.
Figure 2Impact of acetate on glucose consumption, butyric acid production and biomass generation.
The effect of acetate inhibition on butyric acid yield in batch fermentations ofwith an initial 60 g/L glucose or xylose and run until completion
| Butyric acid yield (g/g) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon source | No external acetate with non-adapted culture | 26.3 g/L external acetate with non-adapted culture | 26.3 g/L external acetate with adapted culture |
| Glucose | 0.43 | 0.44 | 0.43 |
| Xylose | 0.43 | 0.48 | 0.48 |
The impact of the presence of acetate on enzymatic Acetate Kinase activity infermentations
| No external acetate with non-adapted culture | 26.3 g/L external acetate with non-adapted culture | 26.3 g/L external acetate with adapted culture | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acetate Kinase activity (Units/mg cellular protein) | 8.42 | 3.15 | 3.15 |
Results reported here are averages of enzymes assays run in triplicate as described in the methods.
Figure 3Effect of acetate inhibition on relative acetic acid fermentation kinetics ofxylose batches.