Literature DB >> 16303149

Cortical correlates of face and scene inversion: a comparison.

Russell A Epstein1, J Stephen Higgins, Whitney Parker, Geoffrey K Aguirre, Samantha Cooperman.   

Abstract

Face recognition is more strongly impaired by stimulus inversion than nonface object recognition. This phenomenon, known as the face inversion effect (FIE), suggests that the visual system contains specialized processing mechanisms that are more engaged by upright faces than by inverted faces or nonface objects. Neuroimaging and neuropsychological studies indicate that environmental scenes may also recruit specialized-purpose processing machinery but a comparable inversion effect for scenes has not been established. Here we demonstrate that both face and scene inversion lead to behavioral penalties during performance of a continuous visual matching task; however, the scene inversion effect was less robust and declined in magnitude over the course of the experiment. Scene inversion led to greater neural response in the functionally defined lateral occipital (LO) object area for inverted versus upright scenes and reduced response in the parahippocampal place area (PPA), while face inversion lead to greater response in LO and the right middle fusiform (MF) object area for inverted versus upright faces but no change in the fusiform face area (FFA). A whole-brain analysis revealed several regions that responded more strongly to either upright versus inverted faces or upright versus inverted scenes, some of which may be involved in post-recognition processing. These results demonstrate that both face and scene inversion cause a shift from specialized processing streams towards generic object-processing mechanisms; however, this shift only leads to a reliable behavioral penalty in the case of face inversion.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16303149     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.10.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  33 in total

1.  Object representations in the temporal cortex of monkeys and humans as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Andrew H Bell; Fadila Hadj-Bouziane; Jennifer B Frihauf; Roger B H Tootell; Leslie G Ungerleider
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Stimulus Dependent Dynamic Reorganization of the Human Face Processing Network.

Authors:  Gideon Rosenthal; Olaf Sporns; Galia Avidan
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 3.  Evaluating functional localizers: the case of the FFA.

Authors:  Marc G Berman; Joonkoo Park; Richard Gonzalez; Thad A Polk; Amanda Gehrke; Scott Knaffla; John Jonides
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Feature-coding transitions to conjunction-coding with progression through human visual cortex.

Authors:  Rosemary A Cowell; Krystal R Leger; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The effects of face inversion on perceiving- and sensing-based change detection.

Authors:  Robin I Goodrich; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2019-05-13

6.  Natural scene categories revealed in distributed patterns of activity in the human brain.

Authors:  Dirk B Walther; Eamon Caddigan; Li Fei-Fei; Diane M Beck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Prevalence of selectivity for mirror-symmetric views of faces in the ventral and dorsal visual pathways.

Authors:  Tim C Kietzmann; Jascha D Swisher; Peter König; Frank Tong
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Neural representations of faces and body parts in macaque and human cortex: a comparative FMRI study.

Authors:  Mark A Pinsk; Michael Arcaro; Kevin S Weiner; Jan F Kalkus; Souheil J Inati; Charles G Gross; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  A cardinal orientation bias in scene-selective visual cortex.

Authors:  Shahin Nasr; Roger B H Tootell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  From upright to upside-down presentation: a spatio-temporal ERP study of the parametric effect of rotation on face and house processing.

Authors:  Boutheina Jemel; Julie Coutya; Caroline Langer; Sylvain Roy
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.