Sean Gallagher1, John R Heberger. 1. Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA. seangallagher@auburn.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Our aims were (a) to perform a systematic literature review of epidemiological studies that examined the interaction of force and repetition with respect to musculoskeletal disorder (MSD) risk, (b) to assess the relationship of force and repetition in fatigue failure studies of musculoskeletal tissues, and (c) to synthesize these findings. BACKGROUND: Many epidemiological studies have examined the effects of force and repetition on MSD risk; however, relatively few have examined the interaction between these risk factors. METHOD: In a literature search, we identified 12 studies that allowed evaluation of a force-repetition interaction with respect to MSD risk. Identified studies were subjected to a methodological quality assessment and critical review. We evaluated laboratory studies of fatigue failure to examine tissue failure responses to force and repetition. RESULTS: Of the 12 epidemiological studies that tested a Force x Repetition interaction, 10 reported evidence of interaction. Based on these results, the suggestion is made that force and repetition may be interdependent in terms of their influence on MSD risk. Fatigue failure studies of musculoskeletal tissues show a pattern of failure that mirrors the MSD risk observed in epidemiological studies. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests that there may be interdependence between force and repetition with respect to MSD risk. Repetition seems to result in modest increases in risk for low-force tasks but rapid increases in risk for high-force tasks. This interaction may be representative of a fatigue failure process in affected tissues.
OBJECTIVE: Our aims were (a) to perform a systematic literature review of epidemiological studies that examined the interaction of force and repetition with respect to musculoskeletal disorder (MSD) risk, (b) to assess the relationship of force and repetition in fatigue failure studies of musculoskeletal tissues, and (c) to synthesize these findings. BACKGROUND: Many epidemiological studies have examined the effects of force and repetition on MSD risk; however, relatively few have examined the interaction between these risk factors. METHOD: In a literature search, we identified 12 studies that allowed evaluation of a force-repetition interaction with respect to MSD risk. Identified studies were subjected to a methodological quality assessment and critical review. We evaluated laboratory studies of fatigue failure to examine tissue failure responses to force and repetition. RESULTS: Of the 12 epidemiological studies that tested a Force x Repetition interaction, 10 reported evidence of interaction. Based on these results, the suggestion is made that force and repetition may be interdependent in terms of their influence on MSD risk. Fatigue failure studies of musculoskeletal tissues show a pattern of failure that mirrors the MSD risk observed in epidemiological studies. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests that there may be interdependence between force and repetition with respect to MSD risk. Repetition seems to result in modest increases in risk for low-force tasks but rapid increases in risk for high-force tasks. This interaction may be representative of a fatigue failure process in affected tissues.
Authors: Poul Frost; Jens Peter E Bonde; Sigurd Mikkelsen; Johan H Andersen; Nils Fallentin; Anette Kaergaard; Jane F Thomsen Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Bionka M A Huisstede; Harald S Miedema; Twan van Opstal; Manon T M de Ronde; Judith I Kuiper; Jan A N Verhaar; Bart W Koes Journal: J Peripher Nerv Syst Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Judd T Kalkhoven; Mark L Watsford; Aaron J Coutts; W Brent Edwards; Franco M Impellizzeri Journal: Sports Med Date: 2021-01-05 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: M F Barbe; B A Hilliard; P W Fisher; A R White; S P Delany; V J Iannarone; M Y Harris; M Amin; G E Cruz; S N Popoff Journal: Connect Tissue Res Date: 2019-08-23 Impact factor: 3.417
Authors: Mary F Barbe; Mamta Amin; Michele Y Harris; Siva Tejaa Panibatla; Soroush Assari; Steven N Popoff; Geoffrey M Bove Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-06-13 Impact factor: 6.208
Authors: Brad D Hendershot; Iman Shojaei; Julian C Acasio; Christopher L Dearth; Babak Bazrgari Journal: J Biomech Date: 2017-11-28 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: N X Jain; A E Barr-Gillespie; B D Clark; D M Kietrys; C K Wade; J Litvin; S N Popoff; M F Barbe Journal: J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 2.041
Authors: Mary F Barbe; Nisha X Jain; Vicky S Massicotte; Steven N Popoff; Ann E Barr-Gillespie Journal: Ind Health Date: 2015-02-09 Impact factor: 2.179