Literature DB >> 26190879

The effects of operator position, pallet orientation, and palletizing condition on low back loads in manual bag palletizing operations.

Sean Gallagher1, John R Heberger2.   

Abstract

Many mining commodities are packaged and shipped using bags. Small bags are typically loaded onto pallets for transport and require a significant amount of manual handling by workers. This specific task of manual bag handling has been associated with the development of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs), especially low back disorders. This study evaluates the biomechanical demands of different work layouts when performing manual palletizing of small bags, and evaluates the biomechanical stresses associated with different stacking techniques. Results indicate that peak forward bending moments as well as spinal compression and shear forces are higher when the pallet is situated at the side of the conveyor as opposed to the end of the conveyor. At low levels of the pallet, controlled bag placement results in higher peak forward bending moments than stacking at higher levels and when dropping the bag to lower levels. The results of this study will be used to inform the development of an audit tool for bagging operations in the mining industry. RELEVANCE TO INDUSTRY: In many cases for workers loading small bags, compression forces exceed the NIOSH criterion of 3400 N. Orientation of the pallet has a significant impact on spinal compression, and positioning the pallet at the end of the conveyor reduces the estimated compressive loading on the lumbar spine by approximately 800 N.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bag stacking; Fatigue failure; Low back biomechanics; Mining; Palletizing

Year:  2015        PMID: 26190879      PMCID: PMC4503528          DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2015.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ind Ergon        ISSN: 0169-8141            Impact factor:   2.656


  17 in total

1.  Flexion and rotation of the trunk and lifting at work are risk factors for low back pain: results of a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  W E Hoogendoorn; P M Bongers; H C de Vet; M Douwes; B W Koes; M C Miedema; G A Ariëns; L M Bouter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Effects of antagonistic co-contraction on differences between electromyography based and optimization based estimates of spinal forces.

Authors:  J H van Dieën; I Kingma
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Analysis of workers' compensation claims associated with manual materials handling.

Authors:  P G Dempsey; L Hashemi
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Investigating reduced bag weight as an effective risk mediator for mason tenders.

Authors:  Kermit G Davis; Susan E Kotowski; James Albers; William S Marras
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 3.661

5.  On human body dynamics.

Authors:  R L Huston; C E Passerello; R E Hessel; M W Harlow
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Relation between spinal load factors and the high-risk probability of occupational low-back disorder.

Authors:  K P Granata; W S Marras
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  A proposed standard procedure for static muscle strength testing.

Authors:  L S Caldwell; D B Chaffin; F N Dukes-Dobos; K H Kroemer; L L Laubach; S H Snook; D E Wasserman
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1974-04

8.  The effect of pallet distance on torso kinematics and low back disorder risk.

Authors:  Michael J Jorgensen; Amit Handa; Prabaharan Veluswamy; Manish Bhatt
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks.

Authors:  T R Waters; V Putz-Anderson; A Garg; L J Fine
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  An epidemiologic study of lifting and twisting on the job and risk for acute prolapsed lumbar intervertebral disc.

Authors:  J L Kelsey; P B Githens; A A White; T R Holford; S D Walter; T O'Connor; A M Ostfeld; U Weil; W O Southwick; J A Calogero
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.494

View more
  5 in total

1.  Development of ergonomics audits for bagging, haul truck and maintenance and repair operations in mining.

Authors:  Patrick G Dempsey; Jonisha Pollard; William L Porter; Alan Mayton; John R Heberger; Sean Gallagher; Leanna Reardon; Colin G Drury
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2017-06-18       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 2.  Emerging Ergonomics Issues and Opportunities in Mining.

Authors:  Patrick G Dempsey; Lydia M Kocher; Mahiyar F Nasarwanji; Jonisha P Pollard; Ashley E Whitson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 3.  Occupational Activities: Factors That Tip the Balance From Bone Accrual to Bone Loss.

Authors:  Mary F Barbe; Steven N Popoff
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 6.642

4.  Adjustments in Shoulder and Back Kinematics during Repetitive Palletizing Tasks.

Authors:  Saeb R Lamooki; Lora A Cavuoto; Jiyeon Kang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  A Simple Method to Optimally Select Upper-Limb Joint Angle Trajectories from Two Kinect Sensors during the Twisting Task for Posture Analysis.

Authors:  Pin-Ling Liu; Chien-Chi Chang; Li Li; Xu Xu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-09       Impact factor: 3.847

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.