Literature DB >> 23516229

Complete Genome Sequences of Two Novel Puma concolor Foamy Viruses from California.

Timo Kehl1, Anne Bleiholder, Florian Roßmann, Sebastian Rupp, Janet Lei, Justin Lee, Walter Boyce, Winston Vickers, Kevin Crooks, Sue Vandewoude, Martin Löchelt.   

Abstract

We report two complete foamy retrovirus (FV) genomes isolated from Puma concolor, a large cat native to the Americas. Due to high overall genetic relatedness to known feline foamy viruses (FFVs), we propose the name Puma concolor FFV (FFVPc). The data confirm that felines are infected with distinct but closely related FVs.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23516229      PMCID: PMC3622991          DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.00201-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Announc


GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Foamy viruses (FVs), also known as syncytial or spuma(retro) viruses, represent the subfamily Spumaretrovirinae within the Retroviridae and are characterized by a complex genetic organization, distinct molecular biology, ability to cross species barriers, and strong ancient coevolution with their authentic hosts (1–4). Although FVs are often highly prevalent in their respective host populations, there is no obvious disease associated with FV infections, even in zoonotically infected humans (5, 6). Here, we report the complete consensus sequences of two FV genomes, isolated from free-ranging American pumas (Puma concolor), displaying high genetic relatedness to other known feline FV (FFV) isolates, thus designated FFVPc (accession numbers KC292054 and KC292055). FFVPc genomic sequences were amplified by nested PCR from peripheral blood leukocyte DNA of animals displaying FFV Gag seroreactivity in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and immunoblotting (to be described elsewhere). The animals, designated X102 and X103, were sampled on the same day in San Diego County, California, and are juvenile (<1 year old) male sibling cubs, still in contact with their dam at the time of capture. Initial primers for gag, env, and bel were derived from the FFV serotype FUV (7), while subsequent PCRs were based on the generated FFVPc sequences. Two to eight individual amplicons were sequenced per animal per genomic region using Sanger sequencing with the ABI 3730xl system. Sequence alignments and consensus sequences were generated by a progressive pairwise global alignment method using Geneious 6.0 (8). The overall genetic organization in both the structural (gag, pol, and env) and accessory (tas/bel1 and bel2/bet) genes and the apparent conservation of canonical FV splice sites in both isolates are consistent with the common characteristics of FVs (9). Only six nucleotides in pol and env differed between the two FFVPc isolates. The three polymorphisms in pol are silent, while variations in env cause the amino acid changes N265D, I531V, and F536L. In all six nucleotide polymorphisms, FFVPc-X102 is identical to FFV FUV. Comparisons to domestic cat FFV sequences revealed overall sequence similarity of 94.4 to 94.5% (7, 10–13). Importantly, both FFVPc isolates are highly related to FFV FUV, which has never before been observed in nondomestic felids (11). Clear genetic differences to known FVs from other felines and comparably high seroprevalence in pumas living in the wild argue that the novel FFVPc isolates are not the end product of current interspecies transmission events but rather an indigenous puma FV. In contrast to in vitro studies of primate, feline, and bovine FVs ([9]; T. Hechler and M. Löchelt, unpublished data), we did not find evidence of FFVPc cDNAs lacking the FV bet intron or other splice events in the env-bel region from DNA directly derived from infected pumas. In summary, the two FFVPc genomes presented here confirm the concept that felines, like primates, harbor highly related but distinct FVs. Sequence variation between both isolates is very low, as both viruses were probably derived from the cubs’ dam, from whom blood samples were unavailable.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The genomic FFVPc sequences have been deposited in the GenBank database under accession no. KC292054 for FFVPc-X102 and accession no. KC292055 for FFVPc-X103.
  12 in total

Review 1.  Non-primate foamy viruses.

Authors:  A Saïb
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.291

2.  Comparison of the complete sequence of feline spumavirus with those of the primate spumaviruses reveals a shorter gag gene.

Authors:  C R Helps; D A Harbour
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.891

3.  Ancient co-speciation of simian foamy viruses and primates.

Authors:  William M Switzer; Marco Salemi; Vedapuri Shanmugam; Feng Gao; Mian-Er Cong; Carla Kuiken; Vinod Bhullar; Brigitte E Beer; Dominique Vallet; Annie Gautier-Hion; Zena Tooze; Francois Villinger; Edward C Holmes; Walid Heneine
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-03-17       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Foamy viruses are unconventional retroviruses.

Authors:  M L Linial
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Isolation and sequencing of infectious clones of feline foamy virus and a human/feline foamy virus Env chimera.

Authors:  Shinichi Hatama; Kaori Otake; Shinya Omoto; Yasunori Murase; Atushi Ikemoto; Masami Mochizuki; Eiji Takahashi; Harumi Okuyama; Yoichi Fujii
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.891

6.  Genetic analyses of feline foamy virus isolates from domestic and wild feline species in geographically distinct areas.

Authors:  H T Phung; Y Ikeda; T Miyazawa; K Nakamura; M Mochizuki; Y Izumiya; E Sato; Y Nishimura; Y Tohya; E Takahashi; T Mikami
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.303

7.  Characterization of the genome of feline foamy virus and its proteins shows distinct features different from those of primate spumaviruses.

Authors:  I Winkler; J Bodem; L Haas; M Zemba; H Delius; R Flower; R M Flügel; M Löchelt
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.103

8.  Feline foamy virus genome and replication strategy.

Authors:  Jacqueline Roy; Wolfram Rudolph; Thomas Juretzek; Kathleen Gärtner; Michael Bock; Ottmar Herchenröder; Dirk Lindemann; Martin Heinkelein; Axel Rethwilm
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 9.  Simian foamy virus infection in humans: prevalence and management.

Authors:  Arifa S Khan
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 10.  Foamy virus transactivation and gene expression.

Authors:  M Löchelt
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.291

View more
  4 in total

1.  Diagnostic Uncertainty and the Epidemiology of Feline Foamy Virus in Pumas (Puma concolor).

Authors:  Nicholas G Dannemiller; Sarah Kechejian; Simona Kraberger; Kenneth Logan; Mathew Alldredge; Kevin R Crooks; Sue VandeWoude; Scott Carver
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Genetic and biological characterization of feline foamy virus isolated from a leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) in Vietnam.

Authors:  Aoi Sumiyoshi; Koichi Kitao; Takayuki Miyazawa
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 1.267

Review 3.  Non-simian foamy viruses: molecular virology, tropism and prevalence and zoonotic/interspecies transmission.

Authors:  Timo Kehl; Juan Tan; Magdalena Materniak
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 4.  Foamy Viruses, Bet, and APOBEC3 Restriction.

Authors:  Ananda Ayyappan Jaguva Vasudevan; Daniel Becker; Tom Luedde; Holger Gohlke; Carsten Münk
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 5.048

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.