PURPOSE: We present a novel approach for the registration of pre-operative magnetic resonance images to intra-operative ultrasound images for the context of image-guided neurosurgery. METHOD: Our technique relies on the maximization of gradient orientation alignment in a reduced set of high confidence locations of interest and allows for fast, accurate, and robust registration. Performance is compared with multiple state-of-the-art techniques including conventional intensity-based multi-modal registration strategies, as well as other context-specific approaches. All methods were evaluated on fourteen clinical neurosurgical cases with brain tumors, including low-grade and high-grade gliomas, from the publicly available MNI BITE dataset. Registration accuracy of each method is evaluated as the mean distance between homologous landmarks identified by two or three experts. We provide an analysis of the landmarks used and expose some of the limitations in validation brought forward by expert disagreement and uncertainty in identifying corresponding points. RESULTS: The proposed approach yields a mean error of 2.57 mm across all cases (the smallest among all evaluated techniques). Additionally, it is the only evaluated technique that resolves all cases with a mean distance of less than 1 mm larger than the theoretical minimal mean distance when using a rigid transformation. CONCLUSION: Finally, our proposed method provides reduced processing times with an average registration time of 0.76 s in a GPU-based implementation, thereby facilitating its integration into the operating room.
PURPOSE: We present a novel approach for the registration of pre-operative magnetic resonance images to intra-operative ultrasound images for the context of image-guided neurosurgery. METHOD: Our technique relies on the maximization of gradient orientation alignment in a reduced set of high confidence locations of interest and allows for fast, accurate, and robust registration. Performance is compared with multiple state-of-the-art techniques including conventional intensity-based multi-modal registration strategies, as well as other context-specific approaches. All methods were evaluated on fourteen clinical neurosurgical cases with brain tumors, including low-grade and high-grade gliomas, from the publicly available MNI BITE dataset. Registration accuracy of each method is evaluated as the mean distance between homologous landmarks identified by two or three experts. We provide an analysis of the landmarks used and expose some of the limitations in validation brought forward by expert disagreement and uncertainty in identifying corresponding points. RESULTS: The proposed approach yields a mean error of 2.57 mm across all cases (the smallest among all evaluated techniques). Additionally, it is the only evaluated technique that resolves all cases with a mean distance of less than 1 mm larger than the theoretical minimal mean distance when using a rigid transformation. CONCLUSION: Finally, our proposed method provides reduced processing times with an average registration time of 0.76 s in a GPU-based implementation, thereby facilitating its integration into the operating room.
Authors: G Unsgaard; T Selbekk; T Brostrup Müller; S Ommedal; S H Torp; G Myhr; J Bang; T A Nagelhus Hernes Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2005-09-19 Impact factor: 2.216
Authors: Laurence Mercier; Rolando F Del Maestro; Kevin Petrecca; David Araujo; Claire Haegelen; D Louis Collins Journal: Med Phys Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Inês Machado; Matthew Toews; Elizabeth George; Prashin Unadkat; Walid Essayed; Jie Luo; Pedro Teodoro; Herculano Carvalho; Jorge Martins; Polina Golland; Steve Pieper; Sarah Frisken; Alexandra Golby; William Wells Iii; Yangming Ou Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2019-08-22 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Simon Drouin; Anna Kochanowska; Marta Kersten-Oertel; Ian J Gerard; Rina Zelmann; Dante De Nigris; Silvain Bériault; Tal Arbel; Denis Sirhan; Abbas F Sadikot; Jeffery A Hall; David S Sinclair; Kevin Petrecca; Rolando F DelMaestro; D Louis Collins Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2016-08-31 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Houssem-Eddine Gueziri; Simon Drouin; Charles X B Yan; D Louis Collins Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2019-06-28 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Ian J Gerard; Marta Kersten-Oertel; Simon Drouin; Jeffery A Hall; Kevin Petrecca; Dante De Nigris; Daniel A Di Giovanni; Tal Arbel; D Louis Collins Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2018-01-26
Authors: Christian Askeland; Ole Vegard Solberg; Janne Beate Lervik Bakeng; Ingerid Reinertsen; Geir Arne Tangen; Erlend Fagertun Hofstad; Daniel Høyer Iversen; Cecilie Våpenstad; Tormod Selbekk; Thomas Langø; Toril A Nagelhus Hernes; Håkon Olav Leira; Geirmund Unsgård; Frank Lindseth Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2015-09-26 Impact factor: 2.924