Literature DB >> 23514792

Risk assessment of idiopathic macular holes undergoing vitrectomy with dye-assisted internal limiting membrane peeling.

Tobias Brockmann1, Claudia Steger, Martin Weger, Andreas Wedrich, Anton Haas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate and identify predictors for idiopathic macular hole persistence after pars plana vitrectomy with dye-assisted internal limiting membrane peeling.
METHODS: In a retrospective case series, 160 eyes underwent identical vitreoretinal procedures performed by the same surgeon. Baseline characteristics and preoperative optical coherence tomography were evaluated regarding the postoperative anatomical outcome.
RESULTS: n overall closure rate of 86.3% (138/160) was achieved. According to the Gass classification system, the closure rates were 100.0% (11/11) in Stage 2, 95.0% (57/60) in Stage 3, and 78.7% (70/89) in Stage 4. Thereby, a significant influence of preoperative best-corrected visual acuity and basal hole diameter was observed. Especially, idiopathic macular hole with a basal hole diameter of ≥800 μm and a best-corrected visual acuity of ≤20/100 had a 4 and 6 times higher risk to persist, respectively. On the other hand, age, gender, bilateral occurrence, symptom duration, and lens status did not have an effect on the surgical outcome. Furthermore, perifoveal pseudocysts were associated with a higher closure rate in Stage 4 idiopathic macular hole.
CONCLUSION: Simple clinical parameters such as best-corrected visual acuity, basal diameter, and perifoveal pseudocysts are efficient predictors and might be used to expand the validity of the Gass classification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23514792     DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31827c5384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Retina        ISSN: 0275-004X            Impact factor:   4.256


  8 in total

1.  Clinical and morphological comparisons of idiopathic macular holes between stage 3 and stage 4.

Authors:  Yanping Yu; Xida Liang; Zengyi Wang; Jing Wang; Wu Liu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Incomplete fluid-air exchange technique for idiopathic macular hole surgery.

Authors:  Bo-Jie Hu; Xue-Li Du; Wen-Bo Li; Yu-Wen Chang; Xing-Dong Shi; Teng Ma; Yong Wang; Yan-Hua He; Rui Niu; Wei-Na Cui
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Visual function and vision-related quality of life after vitrectomy for idiopathic macular hole: a 12mo follow-up study.

Authors:  Hong-Tao Duan; Song Chen; Yue-Xin Wang; Jia-Hui Kong; Meng Dong
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Can perifoveal pseudocyst area be a prognostic factor in macular hole surgery?: A prospective study with quantitative data.

Authors:  Kemal Yuksel; Yasin Sakir Goker; Ahmet Taylan Yazici; Abdullah Ozkaya; Gulen Cosar
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Macular Hole Surgery with Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Facilitated by Membrane-Blue® versus Membrane-Blue-Dual®: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

Authors:  Uri Soiberman; Daniel Shai; Anat Loewenstein; Adiel Barak
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 6.  A Review of Surgical Outcomes and Advances for Macular Holes.

Authors:  Peng-Peng Zhao; Shuang Wang; Nan Liu; Zhi-Min Shu; Jin-Song Zhao
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 1.909

7.  Incidence and prevalence of vitreomacular traction with and without macular hole in Germany.

Authors:  Jacob Menzler; Aljoscha Steffen Neubauer; Christos Haritoglou; Timothy L Jackson
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01-15

Review 8.  Factors Associated with Anatomic Failure and Hole Reopening after Macular Hole Surgery.

Authors:  Yutong Li; Siyan Jin; Lijun Shi; Hecong Qin; Jinsong Zhao
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 1.909

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.