| Literature DB >> 23514704 |
Eloy Erro1, James Bundy, Isobel Massie, Sherri-Ann Chalmers, Aude Gautier, Spyridon Gerontas, Mike Hoare, Peter Sharratt, Sarah Choudhury, Marcin Lubowiecki, Ian Llewellyn, Cécile Legallais, Barry Fuller, Humphrey Hodgson, Clare Selden.
Abstract
Acute liver failure has a high mortality unless patients receive a liver transplant; however, there are insufficient donor organs to meet the clinical need. The liver may rapidly recover from acute injury by hepatic cell regeneration given time. A bioartificial liver machine can provide temporary liver support to enable such regeneration to occur. We developed a bioartificial liver machine using human-derived liver cells encapsulated in alginate, cultured in a fluidized bed bioreactor to a level of function suitable for clinical use (performance competence). HepG2 cells were encapsulated in alginate using a JetCutter to produce ∼500 μm spherical beads containing cells at ∼1.75 million cells/mL beads. Within the beads, encapsulated cells proliferated to form compact cell spheroids (AELS) with good cell-to-cell contact and cell function, that were analyzed functionally and by gene expression at mRNA and protein levels. We established a methodology to enable a ∼34-fold increase in cell density within the AELS over 11-13 days, maintaining cell viability. Optimized nutrient and oxygen provision were numerically modeled and tested experimentally, achieving a cell density at harvest of >45 million cells/mL beads; >5×10(10) cells were produced in 1100 mL of beads. This process is scalable to human size ([0.7-1]×10(11)). A short-term storage protocol at ambient temperature was established, enabling transport from laboratory to bedside over 48 h, appropriate for clinical translation of a manufactured bioartificial liver machine.Entities:
Keywords: HepG2 cells; alginate encapsulation; fluidized bed bioreactor
Year: 2013 PMID: 23514704 PMCID: PMC3569957 DOI: 10.1089/biores.2012.0286
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biores Open Access ISSN: 2164-7844
FIG. 1.Cell density in beads during proliferation phase of the biomass (n=5, mean±SEM). Inset: Average proliferation, (46.57±6.3)×106 cells/mL at harvest (SEM).
FIG. 2.Viability and phase contrast microscopy of HepG2s encapsulated in alginate beads. (A, D) Fluorescein diacetate (FDA)-stained viable cells. (B, E) Propidium iodide (PI)-stained dead cells. (C, F) Phase contrast images. (A–C) Day of encapsulation, (D–F) after 10 days of proliferation in fluidized bed bioreactor.
FIG. 3.Metabolite levels during culture of proliferating biomass. (A) Glucose concentration during proliferation phase (n=5, mean±SEM), peaks match media changes on days 4, 6, 8, and 10). (B) Lactate profile: Lactate concentration during proliferation (n=5, mean±SEM). Falls in lactate correspond to media changes (days 4, 6, 8, and 10). (C) Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) concentration; vertical lines represent samples before and after media change.
Powerblot Analysis
| Adaptive stress proteins | ||||
| p115 | P67420 | 5 | +2.09 | Vesicular transport from the ER to Golgi |
| Plectin −144 | P92020 | 5 | +3.04 | Filament binding protein-crosslinking in cytoskeleton |
| E-cadherin | C377020 | 5 | +1.98 | Calcium-dependent adhesion molecule; increase reduces invasive carcinoma, important for epithelial junction formation |
| Fibronectin | F14420 | 5 | +4.03 | Extracellular matrix protein via integrin binds to collage and attachment to cell, cellular signaling |
| HSP60 | H99020 | 4 | +2.01 | Heat shock protein (HSP), constitutively expressed in normal and apoptotic cells |
| Annexin IV | A29920 | 4 | +2.44 | Family of calcium and phospholipid binding proteins |
| Adaptin alpha | A43920 | 4 | +2.21 | Recruits membrane proteins, vesicular transport |
| REF-1 | R64820 | 4 | +2.51 | Redox factor. Increase by AP-1 DNA binding, DNA repair |
| HRF | H42020 | 5 | −6.37 | Histamine releasing factor |
| Nip-1 | N79420 | 4 | −1.95 | Pro-apoptotic proteins, target proteins to mitochondria |
| Cellular stress response protein | ||||
| Cathepsin D-29 | C47620 | 5 | +9.2 | Tissue remodeling in response to estrogen |
| CDC42 | C70820 | 5 | −4.3 | Rho protein, activates MEKK1 |
| HSF4 –38 | H65520 | 5 | −4.25 | Heat shock factor, mediates transcription of HSPs, increases when there is a decrease of HSP70, 90 |
| Cell cycle proteins | ||||
| KAP-27 | K32120 | 4 | +3.55 | Cdk-associated phosphatase, cell cycle regulation |
| NBS1 | N10720 | 4 | +2.67 | Nijmejin breakage syndrome-complex with Rad 50 and MRE11, important for both DNA damage and repair, and telomere length maintenance |
| Bub3 cl.31 | B11520 | 5 | −3.46 | Sensing kinetochore attachment to microtubules during prometaphase to metaphase transition |
| GCAP-1 | G54220 | 4 | −6.74 | Guanylate cyclase binding protein, cell cycle progression |
| NEK2-46 | N52120 | 4 | −2.71 | Nima related kinase, conditions, controls entry of cells into S phase and mitosis |
| IAK1-46 | I71320 | 4 | −2.68 | Mammalian chromosome segregation |
The most significant results are shown, grouped into biological functions. Confidence levels 5 and 4 are shown as most significant, as a result of reproducibility of results and fold increases. Stress proteins increased in three-dimensional (3D) cultures cf. monolayer culture suggesting an adaptive response to enhanced performance. Comparison of cell-cycle proteins in AELS vs. monolayer, showing that the majority of cell-cycle proteins decreased, since doubling time of monolayer HepG2 cells increased from ∼24 h to 2–3 days when proliferating in 3D culture.
FIG. 4.Amino acid levels during biomass production. (A) Amino acid levels during 12 days of biomass cultivation. Graph shows consumption of five key amino acids being only partially replenished by media changes on days 5, 7, 9, and 11. (B) Successful maintenance of depleted amino acids during fermentation. Control was by use of a model relating cell proliferation and amino acid consumption to predict media supplementation; in all cases the minimum amino acid concentrations remained above 60% of initial value.
FIG. 5.Oxygenation of a typical fluidized bed bioreactor experiment over 11 days. (A) Dissolved oxygen (DO)1 (dO2 in fermentor), DO2 (dO2 immediately after the biomass); additional oxygenation (dashed line) supplied directly to the biomass chamber. (B) Cumulative oxygen consumption of biomass. (C) Oxygen consumption in millimoles per hour.