Literature DB >> 23511284

Benchmarks for multidimensional recovery after burn injury in young adults: the development, validation, and testing of the American Burn Association/Shriners Hospitals for Children young adult burn outcome questionnaire.

Colleen M Ryan1, Jeffrey C Schneider, Lewis E Kazis, Austin Lee, Nien-Chen Li, Michelle Hinson, Helena Bauk, Michael Peck, Walter J Meyer, Tina Palmieri, Frank S Pidcock, Debra Reilly, Ronald G Tompkins.   

Abstract

Although data exist on burn survival, there are little data on long-term burn recovery. Patient-centered health outcomes are useful in monitoring and predicting recovery and evaluating treatments. An outcome questionnaire for young adult burn survivors was developed and tested. This 5-year (2003-2008) prospective, controlled, multicenter study included burned and nonburned adults ages 19 to 30 years. The Young Adult Burn Outcome Questionnaires were completed at initial contact, 10 days, and 6 and 12 months. Factor analysis established construct validity. Reliability assessments used Cronbach α and test-retest. Recovery patterns were investigated using generalized linear models, with generalized estimating equations using mixed models and random effects. Burned (n = 153) and nonburned subjects (n = 112) completed 620 questionnaires (47 items). Time from injury to first questionnaire administration was 157 ± 36 days (mean ± SEM). Factor analysis included 15 factors: Physical Function, Fine Motor Function, Pain, Itch, Social Function Limited by Physical Function, Perceived Appearance, Social Function Limited by Appearance, Sexual Function, Emotion, Family Function, Family Concern, Satisfaction With Symptom Relief, Satisfaction With Role, Work Reintegration, and Religion. Cronbach α ranged from 0.72 to 0.92, with 11 scales >0.8. Test-retest reliability ranged from 0.29 to 0.94, suggesting changes in underlying health status after burns. Recovery curves in five domains, Itch, Perceived Appearance, Social Function Limited by Appearance, Family Concern, and Satisfaction with Symptom Relief, remained below the reference group at 24 months. The Young Adult Burn Outcome Questionnaire is a reliable and valid instrument for multidimensional functional outcomes assessment. Recovery in some domains was incomplete.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23511284     DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31827e7ecf

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Burn Care Res        ISSN: 1559-047X            Impact factor:   1.845


  11 in total

1.  Development of the life impact burn recovery evaluation (LIBRE) profile: assessing burn survivors' social participation.

Authors:  Lewis E Kazis; Molly Marino; Pengsheng Ni; Marina Soley Bori; Flor Amaya; Emily Dore; Colleen M Ryan; Jeff C Schneider; Vivian Shie; Amy Acton; Alan M Jette
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Sexual activity and romantic relationships after burn injury: A Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation (LIBRE) study.

Authors:  Emily A Ohrtman; Gabriel D Shapiro; Audrey E Wolfe; Nhi-Ha T Trinh; Pengsheng Ni; Amy Acton; Mary D Slavin; Colleen M Ryan; Lewis E Kazis; Jeffrey C Schneider
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 2.744

3.  Challenges to the Standardization of Burn Data Collection: A Call for Common Data Elements for Burn Care.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Schneider; Liang Chen; Laura C Simko; Katherine N Warren; Brian Phu Nguyen; Catherine R Thorpe; James C Jeng; William L Hickerson; Lewis E Kazis; Colleen M Ryan
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 1.819

Review 4.  Health related quality of life in adults after burn injuries: A systematic review.

Authors:  Inge Spronk; Catherine Legemate; Irma Oen; Nancy van Loey; Suzanne Polinder; Margriet van Baar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Burn injury.

Authors:  Marc G Jeschke; Margriet E van Baar; Mashkoor A Choudhry; Kevin K Chung; Nicole S Gibran; Sarvesh Logsetty
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 52.329

6.  Recovery of health-related quality of life after burn injuries: An individual participant data meta-analysis.

Authors:  Inge Spronk; Nancy E E Van Loey; Charlie Sewalt; Daan Nieboer; Babette Renneberg; Asgjerd Litleré Moi; Caisa Oster; Lotti Orwelius; Margriet E van Baar; Suzanne Polinder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Validation of PROMIS-29 domain scores among adult burn survivors: A National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research Burn Model System Study.

Authors:  Kara McMullen; Alyssa Bamer; Colleen M Ryan; Jeffrey C Schneider; Nicole Gibran; Barclay T Stewart; Tracy Mroz; Steven Wolf; Dagmar Amtmann
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.697

8.  Reliability & validity of the LIBRE Profile.

Authors:  Emily C Dore; Molly Marino; Pengsheng Ni; Julieta Lomelin-Gascon; Lily Sonis; Flor Amaya; Colleen M Ryan; Jeffrey C Schneider; Alan M Jette; Lewis E Kazis
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 2.609

9.  Social Interactions and Social Activities After Burn Injury: A Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation (LIBRE) Study.

Authors:  Emily A Ohrtman; Gabriel D Shapiro; Laura C Simko; Emily Dore; Mary D Slavin; Cayla Saret; Flor Amaya; J Lomelin-Gascon; Pengsheng Ni; Amy Acton; Molly Marino; Lewis E Kazis; Colleen M Ryan; Jeffrey C Schneider
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 1.819

10.  Psychometric properties of the Brisbane Burn Scar Impact Profile in adults with burn scars.

Authors:  Zephanie Tyack; Roy Kimble; Steven McPhail; Anita Plaza; Megan Simons
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.