Literature DB >> 2351121

Quantitative predictability of carcinogenicity of the covalent binding index of chemicals to DNA: comparison of the in vivo and in vitro assays.

M Taningher1, G Saccomanno, L Santi, S Grilli, S Parodi.   

Abstract

The capability of covalent binding to DNA to predict the initiating potential of chemical carcinogens was compared for the assays performed in vivo (rodent liver DNA) and in vitro (purified DNA incubated in the presence of mouse and rat liver microsomes). A quantitative correlation between DNA adducts and carcinogenic potency was investigated. The in vivo assay appeared slightly, but not significantly, more predictive than the in vitro assay. Also predictivity was slightly higher both in vivo and in vitro when we referred to liver carcinogenicity instead of overall carcinogenicity. The predictive ability found for DNA covalent binding (both in vivo and in vitro) was similar to that of many short-term tests (such as mutagenicity, DNA damage/repair, SCEs, and cell transformation tests). The covalent DNA binding, measured after incubation with DNA in vitro in the presence of liver microsomes, could therefore be a reasonable short-term test offering greater rapidity of execution and requiring the sacrifice of fewer animals than the corresponding in vivo test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2351121      PMCID: PMC1567642          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.9084183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  76 in total

1.  In vivo and in vitro covalent binding of chlorobenzene to nucleic acids.

Authors:  S Grilli; G Arfellini; A Colacci; M Mazzullo; G Prodi
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1985-08

2.  Assembly and preliminary analysis of a genotoxicity data base for predicting carcinogens.

Authors:  M Palajda; H S Rosenkranz
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  Factors modulating the formation of DNA adduct by aflatoxin B1 in vitro.

Authors:  R K Bhattacharya; P F Firozi; V S Aboobaker
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 4.944

4.  The activation and DNA binding of 7-methylbenz[c]-acridine catalysed by mouse liver microsomes.

Authors:  L J Boux; G M Holder
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 8.679

5.  Effect of butylated hydroxyanisole on in vivo and in vitro hepatic aflatoxin B1-DNA binding in rats.

Authors:  P D Lotlikar; M S Clearfield; E C Jhee
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 8.679

6.  Binding of metabolites of cyclophosphamide to DNA in a rat liver microsomal system and in vivo in mice.

Authors:  K Hemminki
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Evaluation of the DNA-repair host-mediated assay. I. Induction of repairable DNA damage in E. coli cells recovered from liver, spleen, lungs, kidneys, and the blood stream of mice treated with methylating carcinogens.

Authors:  P R Kerklaan; S Bouter; P A van Elburg; G R Mohn
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  Comparison of aflatoxin B1 and aflatoxin G1 binding to cellular macromolecules in vitro, in vivo and after peracid oxidation; characterisation of the major nucleic acid adducts.

Authors:  R C Garner; C N Martin; J R Smith; B F Coles; M R Tolson
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 5.192

9.  In vivo and in vitro binding of 1,2-dibromoethane and 1,2-dichloroethane to macromolecules in rat and mouse organs.

Authors:  G Arfellini; S Bartoli; A Colacci; M Mazzullo; M C Galli; G Prodi; S Grilli
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.553

10.  A carcinogenic potency database of the standardized results of animal bioassays.

Authors:  L S Gold; C B Sawyer; R Magaw; G M Backman; M de Veciana; R Levinson; N K Hooper; W R Havender; L Bernstein; R Peto
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Mammalian models of chemically induced primary malignancies exploitable for imaging-based preclinical theragnostic research.

Authors:  Yewei Liu; Ting Yin; Yuanbo Feng; Marlein Miranda Cona; Gang Huang; Jianjun Liu; Shaoli Song; Yansheng Jiang; Qian Xia; Johannes V Swinnen; Guy Bormans; Uwe Himmelreich; Raymond Oyen; Yicheng Ni
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2015-10

Review 2.  Evaluation of in vitro assays for assessing the toxicity of cigarette smoke and smokeless tobacco.

Authors:  Michael D Johnson; Jodi Schilz; Mirjana V Djordjevic; Jerry R Rice; Peter G Shields
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 3.  Tamoxifen and secondary tumours. An update.

Authors:  N Wilking; E Isaksson; E von Schoultz
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Comparison of DNA adduct formation between 2,4 and 2,6-dinitrotoluene by 32P-postlabelling analysis.

Authors:  D K La; J R Froines
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 5.153

5.  Examples of uses of databases for quantitative and qualitative correlation studies between genotoxicity and carcinogenicity.

Authors:  S Parodi; D Malacarne; M Taningher
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 9.031

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.