Literature DB >> 2351089

The EMG-force relationships of skeletal muscle; dependence on contraction rate, and motor units control strategy.

M Solomonow1, R Baratta, H Shoji, R D'Ambrosia.   

Abstract

The dependence of the EMG vs force relationships on skeletal muscles contraction rate, and its motor units recruitment control strategy were studied. An electrical nerve stimulation technique capable of orderly excitation of motor units according to their size with simultaneous increase in their discharge rate was applied to isometric preparations of the M. gastrocnemius muscle of the cat. Muscle force and intramuscularly recorded EMG were normalized and plotted against each other. The method of least squares (p less than .05) was used to yield the best fit linear regression polynominials to the pooled data from several preparations. Strong dependency on the motor unit recruitment strategy was exhibited by the results. Linear EMG vs force relationships was evident when all the motor units were recruited to generate the initial 50% of the maximal force while discharge rate continued to increase up to the maximal force. Progressive increase in non-linearity was evident as recruitment of motor units generated 60% and up to 100% of the initial force concurrently with firing rate increase. Contraction rate (force generation rate) increase from 36% sec up to 360% sec resulted in nearly identical normalized EMG vs force relationships, although the maximal force increased by up to 22.5% as the contraction rate increased to 360% sec. The results of this study issue a clear warning against the direct use of EMG to predict muscle force in biomechanical and kinesiological research without correcting for the variables discussed in this paper.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2351089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0301-150X


  21 in total

1.  The musculoskeletal system of humans is not tuned to maximize the economy of locomotion.

Authors:  David R Carrier; Christoph Anders; Nadja Schilling
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The acute effects of static stretching on peak torque, mean power output, electromyography, and mechanomyography.

Authors:  J T Cramer; T J Housh; J P Weir; G O Johnson; J W Coburn; T W Beck
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  An electromyographic comparison of 4 closed chain exercises.

Authors:  J T Hopkins; C D Ingersoll; M A Sandrey; S D Bleggi
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Commentary.

Authors:  T W Worrell
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Motor unit properties from three synergistic muscles during ramp isometric elbow extensions.

Authors:  B Harwood; B H Dalton; G A Power; C L Rice
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Motor unit recruitment strategy changes with skill acquisition.

Authors:  M Bernardi; M Solomonow; G Nguyen; A Smith; R Baratta
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1996

7.  Activation characteristics of shoulder muscles during maximal and submaximal efforts.

Authors:  Christoph Anders; Susanne Bretschneider; Annette Bernsdorf; Wolfgang Schneider
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 8.  Bilateral deficit in maximal force production.

Authors:  Jakob Škarabot; Neil Cronin; Vojko Strojnik; Janne Avela
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 9.  The use of electromyography for the noninvasive prediction of muscle forces. Current issues.

Authors:  J J Dowling
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  EMG-force relation in the first dorsal interosseous muscle of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Faezeh Jahanmiri-Nezhad; Xiaogang Hu; Nina L Suresh; William Z Rymer; Ping Zhou
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 2.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.