Literature DB >> 16558588

An electromyographic comparison of 4 closed chain exercises.

J T Hopkins1, C D Ingersoll, M A Sandrey, S D Bleggi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Closed chain exercises are used in the clinical setting to safely strengthen the muscles about the knee. We compared the EMG activity of 3 muscles (vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, and biceps femoris) during 4 closed chain exercises (unilateral one-quarter squat, lateral step-up, FlexCord front pull, and FlexCord back pull) to determine which exercise produced the most muscle activity. DESIGN AND
SETTING: We used a 4 x 3 x 2 factorial design with repeated measures on exercise, muscle, and movement (knee flexion and extension). Muscle and movement were the control variables for post hoc comparisons. Data were collected in a sports injury research laboratory.
SUBJECTS: Thirty-eight healthy, active female college students aged 21.97 +/- 2.8 years, with height 166.9 +/- 6.3 cm and weight 61.9 +/- 8.5 kg. Subjects had no history of lower extremity pathology that resulted in surgery and no lower extremity pathology within the last year. MEASUREMENTS: We placed surface electrodes on the vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, and biceps femoris muscles. Synchronized with a metronome, subjects performed 3 repetitions of 4 exercises between 5 degrees and 30 degrees of knee flexion. Electromyographic measurements were taken from the middle third of the flexion and extension phase of each repetition.
RESULTS: The FlexCord front pull and back pull produced higher levels of biceps femoris activity than the quarter squat and step-up. The FlexCord front pull also produced a higher level of vastus medialis activity during knee extension than the quarter squat, lateral step-up, or FlexCord back pull.
CONCLUSIONS: The high levels of biceps femoris activity during the FlexCord exercises indicate that a greater cocontraction exists. With a greater cocontraction, the FlexCord exercises could be safely used during ACL rehabilitation. The high levels of vastus medialis activity during the FlexCord front pull suggest that it may be a beneficial exercise for patellofemoral rehabilitation.

Year:  1999        PMID: 16558588      PMCID: PMC1323346     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  23 in total

1.  Rehabilitation following knee surgery. Recommendations.

Authors:  L E Paulos; D C Wnorowski; C L Beck
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Electromyographic evaluation of closed and open kinetic chain knee rehabilitation exercises.

Authors:  V L Graham; G M Gehlsen; J A Edwards
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  The EMG-force relationships of skeletal muscle; dependence on contraction rate, and motor units control strategy.

Authors:  M Solomonow; R Baratta; H Shoji; R D'Ambrosia
Journal:  Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1990 Apr-May

4.  Nonlinear relationship between averaged electromyogram potential and muscle tension in normal subjects.

Authors:  E N Zuniga; E G Simons
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  "Efficiency of electrical activity" as a physiological measure of the functional state of muscle tissue.

Authors:  H A DeVries
Journal:  Am J Phys Med       Date:  1968-02

6.  Electrical and metabolic activities and fatigue in human isometric contraction.

Authors:  E Kuroda; V Klissouras; J H Milsum
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 3.531

7.  Reproducibility of electromyographic measurements with inserted wire electrodes and surface electrodes.

Authors:  P V Komi; E R Buskirk
Journal:  Electromyography       Date:  1970 Nov-Dec

8.  Muscular coactivation. The role of the antagonist musculature in maintaining knee stability.

Authors:  R Baratta; M Solomonow; B H Zhou; D Letson; R Chuinard; R D'Ambrosia
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 9.  Rehabilitation concerns following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  P A Frndak; C C Berasi
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Accelerated rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  K D Shelbourne; P Nitz
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1990 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  7 in total

1.  Balance training for the older athlete.

Authors:  Michael E Rogers; Phil Page; Nobuo Takeshima
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-08

2.  Muscle strength and damage following two modes of variable resistance training.

Authors:  Saied Jalal Aboodarda; John George; Abdul Halim Mokhtar; Martin Thompson
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  EXERCISES THAT FACILITATE OPTIMAL HAMSTRING AND QUADRICEPS CO-ACTIVATION TO HELP DECREASE ACL INJURY RISK IN HEALTHY FEMALES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE.

Authors:  Rachel Dedinsky; Lindsey Baker; Samuel Imbus; Melissa Bowman; Leigh Murray
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-02

4.  Effectiveness of elastic resistance in rehabilitation of patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome: what is the evidence?

Authors:  Phil Page
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.843

5.  A simple test of muscle coactivation estimation using electromyography.

Authors:  U F Ervilha; T Graven-Nielsen; M Duarte
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 2.590

6.  Leg Press vs. Smith Machine: Quadriceps Activation and Overall Perceived Effort Profiles.

Authors:  Gian Mario Migliaccio; Antonio Dello Iacono; Luca Paolo Ardigò; Pierre Samozino; Enzo Iuliano; Zoran Grgantov; Johnny Padulo
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Electromyographic activity and applied load during high intensity elastic resistance and nautilus machine exercises.

Authors:  Saied J Aboodarda; Mohamad A H Shariff; Ahmad Munir Che Muhamed; Fatimah Ibrahim; Ashril Yusof
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2011-12-25       Impact factor: 2.193

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.