Literature DB >> 23510753

Quality of life in severely injured patients depends on psychosocial factors rather than on severity or type of injury.

C C H M van Delft-Schreurs1, J J M van Bergen, M A C de Jongh, P van de Sande, M H J Verhofstad, J de Vries.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Former studies have demonstrated that health-related quality of life is decreased in severely injured patients. However, in those studies patients were asked about their functioning and not about their (dis)contentment concerning their functioning. Little is known about how severely injured patients experience their quality of life (QOL). The objective of this cross-sectional study was to measure this subjective QOL of severely injured patients after their rehabilitation phase and to examine which accident- and patient-related factors affect the QOL of these patients.
METHODS: Patients of 18 years or older with an injury severity score (ISS) above 15 were included 15-53 months after their accident. Comorbidity before the accident, accident and sociodemographic characteristics, and QOL were obtained from the trauma registry and questionnaires. The WHOQOL-BREF was used to measure QOL. A reference group of the Dutch general population was used for comparison.
RESULTS: The participation rate was 61% (n=173). Compared with the reference data, severely injured patients experienced a significantly worse QOL in all domains except social relations. The QOL scores were significantly decreased in all domains for patients with intracranial injury in combination with other injuries. Patients with a severe intracranial injury (AIS>3) only reported significantly impaired QOL in the general and physical domains. Patients who resumed working or lived with others had significantly higher scores in all domains of QOL than patients who did not work anymore or were living alone. Significantly lower QOL scores were obtained from patients with comorbidity before the accident and from patients with longer durations of intensive care unit (ICU) treatment or hospitalisation. Gender, accident characteristics and time since the accident did not appear to be important for experienced QOL.
CONCLUSIONS: The experience of impaired QOL appears to depend on living alone, inability to return to work and pre-accidental comorbidity rather than on the injured body area or the severity of the injury. Duration of hospital or ICU stay is important to subsequent QOL, even if ISS or body region is not.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Injury; Quality of life; Trauma

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23510753     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.02.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  19 in total

1.  A cross-sectional study of psychological complaints and quality of life in severely injured patients.

Authors:  C C H M van Delft-Schreurs; J J M van Bergen; P van de Sande; M H J Verhofstad; J de Vries; M A C de Jongh
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Comparing life satisfaction and functioning 15 years after September 11, 2001 among survivors with and without injuries: a mixed-method study.

Authors:  Lisa M Gargano; Ho Ki Mok; Melanie H Jacobson; Patricia Frazier; Sascha K Garrey; Lysa J Petrsoric; Robert M Brackbill
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Adaptation and validation of the self-report version of the scale for measuring quality of life in people with acquired brain injury (CAVIDACE).

Authors:  Alba Aza; Miguel Ángel Verdugo; María Begoña Orgaz; María Fernández; Antonio Manuel Amor
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Death and long-term disability after gun injury: a cohort analysis.

Authors:  Sheharyar Raza; Deva Thiruchelvam; Donald A Redelmeier
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2020-07-14

5.  Validation of the "Quality of Life in Life-Threatening Illness--Family Carer Version" (QOLLTI-F) in German-speaking carers of advanced cancer patients.

Authors:  Sophie Schur; Alexandra Ebert-Vogel; Michaela Amering; Eva Katharina Masel; Marie Neubauer; Andrea Schrott; Ingrid Sibitz; Herbert Watzke; Beate Schrank
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  How do the influencing factors of health-related quality of life of the injured patient differ according to activity limitations?

Authors:  Eunmi Lee; Yujeong Kim
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Health-related quality of life among US military personnel injured in combat: findings from the Wounded Warrior Recovery Project.

Authors:  Susan I Woodruff; Michael R Galarneau; Cameron T McCabe; Daniel I Sack; Mary C Clouser
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Utility of repeat head computed tomography after mild head trauma: influence on short- and long-term prognosis and health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Francesca Innocenti; Beatrice Del Taglia; Irene Tassinari; Federica Trausi; Alberto Conti; Maurizio Zanobetti; Riccardo Pini
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 3.397

9.  Quality of life in rehabilitation outpatients: normal values and a comparison with the general Dutch population and psychiatric patients.

Authors:  Ernst Schrier; Irene Schrier; Jan H B Geertzen; Pieter U Dijkstra
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  The definition of major trauma using different revisions of the abbreviated injury scale.

Authors:  Jan C Van Ditshuizen; Charlie A Sewalt; Cameron S Palmer; Esther M M Van Lieshout; Michiel H J Verhofstad; Dennis Den Hartog
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.