PURPOSE: To test the feasibility of targeted intraarterial administration of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor chemotherapeutic agent sorafenib to inhibit embolotherapy-induced tumor angiogenesis and reduce systemic drug side effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The left hepatic lobes of five New Zealand White rabbits (mean weight, 2.7 kg±0.2) were treated with chemoembolization with sorafenib and ethiodized oil emulsion, followed by immediate euthanasia. Postprocedure noncontrast computed tomography (CT) was used to evaluate intrahepatic chemotherapy mixture distribution. Liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was then used to directly measure sorafenib concentration in the treated liver tissue. Histopathologic assessment of treated left lobes was performed to identify any immediate toxic effects of the sorafenib solution. RESULTS: Lobar sorafenib chemoembolization was successfully performed in all cases via the left hepatic artery. Sorafenib and ethiodized oil (mean, 6.4 mg±3.8 and 0.95 mL±0.7, respectively) were injected, and CT confirmed targeted left hepatic lobe sorafenib emulsion delivery in all cases. Corresponding LC-MS/MS analysis yielded a mean sorafenib concentration of 94.2 μg/mL±48.3 in treated left lobe samples (n = 5), significantly greater than typical therapeutic drug levels (2-10 μg/mL) achieved with oral sorafenib systemic therapy. Histopathologic assessment showed only mild or moderate nonspecific ballooning degeneration in zone 3 hepatocytes, without tissue necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted transarterial sorafenib delivery is feasible and results in higher tissue drug levels than reported for systemic sorafenib therapy, without immediate histopathologic tissue toxicity. Future studies should aim to determine the utility of sorafenib chemoembolization in reducing hypoxia-induced vasculogenesis in liver tumors.
PURPOSE: To test the feasibility of targeted intraarterial administration of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor chemotherapeutic agent sorafenib to inhibit embolotherapy-induced tumor angiogenesis and reduce systemic drug side effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The left hepatic lobes of five New Zealand White rabbits (mean weight, 2.7 kg±0.2) were treated with chemoembolization with sorafenib and ethiodized oil emulsion, followed by immediate euthanasia. Postprocedure noncontrast computed tomography (CT) was used to evaluate intrahepatic chemotherapy mixture distribution. Liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was then used to directly measure sorafenib concentration in the treated liver tissue. Histopathologic assessment of treated left lobes was performed to identify any immediate toxic effects of the sorafenib solution. RESULTS: Lobar sorafenib chemoembolization was successfully performed in all cases via the left hepatic artery. Sorafenib and ethiodized oil (mean, 6.4 mg±3.8 and 0.95 mL±0.7, respectively) were injected, and CT confirmed targeted left hepatic lobe sorafenib emulsion delivery in all cases. Corresponding LC-MS/MS analysis yielded a mean sorafenib concentration of 94.2 μg/mL±48.3 in treated left lobe samples (n = 5), significantly greater than typical therapeutic drug levels (2-10 μg/mL) achieved with oral sorafenib systemic therapy. Histopathologic assessment showed only mild or moderate nonspecific ballooning degeneration in zone 3 hepatocytes, without tissue necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted transarterial sorafenib delivery is feasible and results in higher tissue drug levels than reported for systemic sorafenib therapy, without immediate histopathologic tissue toxicity. Future studies should aim to determine the utility of sorafenib chemoembolization in reducing hypoxia-induced vasculogenesis in liver tumors.
Authors: Dirk Strumberg; Heike Richly; Ralf A Hilger; Norbert Schleucher; Sonke Korfee; Mitra Tewes; Markus Faghih; Erich Brendel; Dimitris Voliotis; Claus G Haase; Brian Schwartz; Ahmad Awada; Rudolf Voigtmann; Max E Scheulen; Siegfried Seeber Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-12-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Li Liu; Yichen Cao; Charles Chen; Xiaomei Zhang; Angela McNabola; Dean Wilkie; Scott Wilhelm; Mark Lynch; Christopher Carter Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-12-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Andrew S Kennedy; Charles Nutting; Douglas Coldwell; James Gaiser; Cinthia Drachenberg Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2004-12-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Dirk Strumberg; Jeffrey W Clark; Ahmad Awada; Malcolm J Moore; Heike Richly; Alain Hendlisz; Hal W Hirte; Joseph P Eder; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Brian Schwartz Journal: Oncologist Date: 2007-04
Authors: H Yoshiji; S Kuriyama; J Yoshii; M Yamazaki; M Kikukawa; H Tsujinoue; T Nakatani; H Fukui Journal: Hepatology Date: 1998-12 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: J L Raoul; D Heresbach; J F Bretagne; D B Ferrer; R Duvauferrier; P Bourguet; M Messner; M Gosselin Journal: Cancer Date: 1992-08-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Scott M Wilhelm; Christopher Carter; Liya Tang; Dean Wilkie; Angela McNabola; Hong Rong; Charles Chen; Xiaomei Zhang; Patrick Vincent; Mark McHugh; Yichen Cao; Jaleel Shujath; Susan Gawlak; Deepa Eveleigh; Bruce Rowley; Li Liu; Lila Adnane; Mark Lynch; Daniel Auclair; Ian Taylor; Rich Gedrich; Andrei Voznesensky; Bernd Riedl; Leonard E Post; Gideon Bollag; Pamela A Trail Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2004-10-01 Impact factor: 13.312
Authors: Ahmad Parvinian; Leigh C Casadaban; Zane Z Hauck; Richard B van Breemen; Ron C Gaba Journal: Diagn Interv Radiol Date: 2015 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.630
Authors: Jeane Chen; Sarah B White; Kathleen R Harris; Weiguo Li; Jonathan W T Yap; Dong-Hyun Kim; Robert J Lewandowski; Lonnie D Shea; Andrew C Larson Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2015-05-15 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Wei Zhang; Matthew R Lowerison; Zhijie Dong; Rita J Miller; Krista A Keller; Pengfei Song Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 3.694