Literature DB >> 1320447

Chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinomas. A study of the biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin.

J L Raoul1, D Heresbach, J F Bretagne, D B Ferrer, R Duvauferrier, P Bourguet, M Messner, M Gosselin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the effects of an association of ethiodized oil (Lipiodol Ultra Fluide, Laboratoires Guerbet, Aulnay-sous-Bois, France), with or without gelatin sponge, with doxorubicin (Adriamycin, Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH) on the biodistribution and kinetics of doxorubicin during intraarterial injection.
METHODS: Eighteen patients with hepatocellular carcinoma on cirrhotic liver received a therapeutic injection into the hepatic artery of 50 mg of doxorubicin alone (Group 1; n = 4), or emulsified in 10 ml of ethiodized oil and 2.5 ml of ioxaglate (Hexabrix, Laboratoires Guerbet) with (Group 2; n = 7) or without (Group 3; n = 7) gelatin sponge embolization. Before treatment, the absence of intrahepatic shunts was verified by an injection of technetium-labeled albumin macroaggregates. The biodistribution of doxorubicin was studied on two fronts: (1) pharmacokinetic--by measurement of the doxorubicin blood level during the 48 hours after injection; and (2) scintigraphic (2 mg of doxorubicin were labeled with 2 mCi of iodine 131)--by examination of the scintigrams and calculation of the following parameters: tumours liver/nontumorous liver binding ratio (T/NT ratio), liver/liver+lungs+abdomen binding ratio, and doxorubicin half-life in tumorous tissue.
RESULTS: Pharmacokinetics results showed the following: the peak plasma concentration was significantly higher in Group 1 as compared with Groups 2 or 3 (Group 1: 2.1 +/- 0.9 mg/ml; Group 2: 0.9 +/- 0.3 mg/ml; Group 3: 0.5 +/- 0.2 mg/ml); the area under curve calculated from time zero to 1 hour was lower in Groups 2 and 3 compared with Group 1. Examination of the scintigrams showed the following: diffuse activity throughout the organism (Group 1), diffuse activity with strong hepatic and tumorous binding (Group 2), and mostly hepatic and tumoral binding (Group 3). The liver/liver+lungs+abdomen binding ratio was 28% +/- 1% in Group 1, 36% +/- 5% in Group 2, and 63% +/- 7% in Group 3. The T/NT ratios were 1.0 +/- 0 (Group 1), 1.5 +/- 0.1 (Group 2), and 4.7 +/- 0.5 (Group 3). The doxorubicin half-lives in tumourous tissue were 0.7 +/- 0.1 days (Group 1), 1.8 +/- 0.2 days (Group 2), and 2.6 days (n = 1; Group 3).
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows (1) that the association of ethiodized oil with doxorubicin lowers the peak concentration of doxorubicin and increases the intratumoral concentration and half-life of doxorubicin, and (2) that these kinetic ameliorations are even more pronounced after embolization. Therefore, from a kinetic standpoint, the doxorubicin-ethiodized oil-gelatin sponge association is the best.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1320447     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19920801)70:3<585::aid-cncr2820700308>3.0.co;2-#

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  34 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetic study of conventional sorafenib chemoembolization in a rabbit VX2 liver tumor model.

Authors:  Ahmad Parvinian; Leigh C Casadaban; Zane Z Hauck; Richard B van Breemen; Ron C Gaba
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 2.  Changes of HBV DNA After Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma and the Efficacy of Antiviral Treatment.

Authors:  Xiao-Jun Lin; Xiang-Ming Lao; Ming Shi; Sheng-Ping Li
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Transarterial approaches to primary and secondary hepatic malignancies.

Authors:  Ali Habib; Kush Desai; Ryan Hickey; Bartley Thornburg; Robert Lewandowski; Riad Salem
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Doxorubicin-eluting beads versus conventional transarterialchemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xueping Zhou; Zhaohui Tang; Jiandong Wang; Peiyi Lin; Zhisheng Chen; Lisheng Lv; Zhiwei Quan; Yingbin Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-11-15

Review 5.  Role of Transcatheter Intra-arterial Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Shashi B Paul; Hanish Sharma
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2014-05-24

6.  Current trends in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with transarterial embolization: a cross-sectional survey of techniques.

Authors:  Shamar Young; Paul Craig; Jafar Golzarian
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Treatment of intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Alejandro Forner; Marine Gilabert; Jordi Bruix; Jean-Luc Raoul
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  Therapeutic effects and prognostic factors in three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  De-Hua Wu; Li Liu; Long-Hua Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Prospective randomized study of doxorubicin-eluting-bead embolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: results of the PRECISION V study.

Authors:  Johannes Lammer; Katarina Malagari; Thomas Vogl; Frank Pilleul; Alban Denys; Anthony Watkinson; Michael Pitton; Geraldine Sergent; Thomas Pfammatter; Sylvain Terraz; Yves Benhamou; Yves Avajon; Thomas Gruenberger; Maria Pomoni; Herbert Langenberger; Marcus Schuchmann; Jerome Dumortier; Christian Mueller; Patrick Chevallier; Riccardo Lencioni
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 10.  The current practice of transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Sung Wook Shin
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.