| Literature DB >> 23510434 |
Chanchai Chailert1, Usanee Sanmee, Waraporn Piromlertamorn, Sudarat Samchimchom, Teraporn Vutyavanich.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is still debatable whether a full-thickness assisted hatching (AH) is better than the partial zona thinning. In this research, we used a mouse model to study the effect of partial and complete laser-AH on the rate of completely hatched blastocyst and their cell numbers.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23510434 PMCID: PMC3606362 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7827-11-21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Biol Endocrinol ISSN: 1477-7827 Impact factor: 5.211
Summary of embryos utilized in this study
| Control = 110 | Control = 120 | Control = 180 |
| 1-hole (10 μm ) = 110 | 1-hole (20 μm ) = 120 | Complete AH = 180 |
| 2-holes (10 μm ) = 110 | 2-holes (20 μm ) = 120 | Zona thinning = 180 |
| 3-holes (10 μm ) = 110 |
Number of cells in the inner cell mass (ICM), trophectoderm (TE), total cells, and ICM:TE ratio of hatched blastocysts in the control and laser groups in experiment 1
| ICM | 23.6±4.6 | 19.5±3.8 | 16.5±3.0 | 15.2±2.3 | 0.000 |
| TE | 68.7±15.9 | 59.7±14.1 | 53.1±8.4 | 50.3±9.8 | 0.000 |
| ICM/TE | 0.4±0.1 | 0.3±0.1 | 0.3±0.1 | 0.3±0.1 | 0.184 |
| Total | 92.2±18.3 | 79.2±16.4 | 68.9±9.4 | 65.5±10.1 | 0.000 |
Values are mean ± standard deviation (SD).
One-way ANOVA with Scheffe post-hoc test when P<0.0125 (P<0.05/4).
a control vs. 1-hole group (P=0.004), control vs. 2-hole group (P=0.000), control vs. 3-hole group (P=0.000), and 1-hole vs. 3-hole group (P=0.039).
b control vs. 2-hole group (P=0.006), and control vs. 3-hole group (P=0.002).
c control vs. 1-hole group (P=0.036), control vs. 2-hole group (P=0.000), and control vs. 3-hole group (P=0.000).
Number of cells in the inner cell mass (ICM), trophectoderm (TE), total cells, and ICM:TE ratio of hatched blastocysts in the control and laser groups in experiment 2
| ICM | 23.5±2.7 | 20.7±3.1 | 19.6±3.5 | 0.000 |
| TE | 64.8±6.8 | 55.7±9.4 | 53.7±10.6 | 0.000 |
| ICM:TE | 0.4±0.04 | 0.4±0.05 | 0.4±0.06 | 0.661 |
| Total | 88.2±8.1 | 76.3±11.6 | 73.1±12.9 | 0.000 |
Values are means ± standard deviation (SD).
One-way ANOVA with Scheffe post-hoc test when P<0.0125 (P<0.05/4).
control vs. 1-hole group (P=0.000), and control vs. 2-hole group (P=0.000).
control vs. 1-hole group (P=0.000), and control vs. 2-hole group (P=0.000).
control vs. 1-hole group (P=0.000), and control vs. 2-hole group (P=0.000).
Effects of laser quarter-thinning and full-thickness opening on the rate of blastulation, blastocyst hatching, and completely hatched blastocyst at 24, 48 and 72 hours post assisted hatching, compared with non-manipulated controls in experiment 3
| Blastulation rate | 176 (97.8%) | 173 (96.1%) | 178 (98.9%) | 0.260 |
| Hatching rate | 97 (55.1%) | 167 (96.5%) | 167 (93.8%) | 0.000 |
| Hatched rate | 75 (42.6%) | 106 (61.3%) | 69 (38.8%) | 0.000 |
Fisher’s Exact Test = 2.815.
Pearson Chi-Square test, χ 2 = 126.59.
Pearson Chi-Square test, χ 2 = 20.292.
Number of cells in the inner cell mass (ICM), trophectoderm (TE), ICM:TE ratio and total cell number in control, full-thickness and quarter zonal thinning groups in experiment 3
| ICM | 23.7±3.4 | 20.85±3.08 | 21.63±3.06 | 0.000 |
| TE | 65.9±9.9 | 55.19±10.19 | 58.76±8.67 | 0.000 |
| ICM:TE | 0.36±0.04 | 0.38±0.05 | 0.36±0.03 | 0.02 |
| Total | 89.4±12.7 | 76.0±12.8 | 80.4±11.3 | 0.000 |
Values are mean ± standard deviation (SD).
Some blastocysts were excluded due to accidental lost or poor staining.
As a safeguard against multiple tests of statistical significance on the same data, the Bonferroni correction was used to adjust the P-value. In this case, a P-value <0.05/4 or <0.0125 was considered to indicate a significant difference.
One-way ANOVA with Scheffe post-hoc test when P<0.0125.
control vs. full-thickness group (P=0.000), and control vs. quarter-thinning group (P=0.001), and full-thickness vs. quarter thinning group (P=0.307).
control vs. full-thickness group (P=0.000), control vs. quarter thinning group (P=0.000), full-thickness vs. quarter-thinning group (P=0.076).
control vs. full-thickness group (P=0.000), control vs. quarter thinning group (P=0.000) full-thickness vs. quarter thinning group (P=0.09).