Literature DB >> 2351000

Anorectal function investigations in incontinent and continent patients. Differences and discriminatory value.

R J Felt-Bersma1, E C Klinkenberg-Knol, S G Meuwissen.   

Abstract

Anal manometry, rectal capacity measurement, and the saline-infusion test were performed in 350 patients, 178 of whom had fecal incontinence and 172 of whom were continent. Anal manometry was also performed in 80 control subjects, whose results were compared with the patients. Women and older patients exhibited lower pressures. Compared with continent patients, incontinent patients had lower anal sphincter pressures at rest and during squeeze, a smaller rectal capacity, and leaked earlier and more with the saline infusion test. Differentiation between incontinent and continent patients was not possible with a single test because there was complete overlap. The maximum squeeze pressure showed the best discrimination. Combining the three tests did not show better discrimination than any individual test. Anal pressure and rectal capacity below the normal range only were found in very few incontinent patients. The authors' study demonstrates that no prediction can be made about continence with anorectal function tests. Therefore, in the individual patient, an abnormal result in one test must be interpreted with caution and only in relationship with other tests, especially when therapeutic surgery is considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2351000     DOI: 10.1007/bf02052142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  30 in total

Review 1.  The usefulness of tests in anorectal disease.

Authors:  T G Parks
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Anal manometry.

Authors:  R J Felt-Bersma; S G Meuwissen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Altered Colorectal Compliance and Anorectal Physiology in Upper and Lower Motor Neurone Spinal Injury May Explain Bowel Symptom Pattern.

Authors:  Prateesh M Trivedi; Lalit Kumar; Anton V Emmanuel
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Managing faecal incontinence.

Authors:  Robert J C Steele; Kenneth L Campbell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-01-29

5.  Age effects on anorectal pressure in anal continent women with lower urinary tract dysfunction.

Authors:  Soo-Cheen Ng; Gin-Den Chen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-06-22

Review 6.  Investigating and treating fecal incontinence: when and how.

Authors:  Adriana Lazarescu; Geoffrey K Turnbull; Stephen Vanner
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 7.  High-Resolution Anorectal Manometry - New Insights in the Diagnostic Assessment of Functional Anorectal Disorders.

Authors:  Henriette Heinrich; Benjamin Misselwitz
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2018-04-20

Review 8.  New Metrics in High-Resolution and High-Definition Anorectal Manometry.

Authors:  Myeongsook Seo; Segyeong Joo; Kee Wook Jung; Eun Mi Song; Satish S C Rao; Seung-Jae Myung
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2018-11-05

Review 9.  Anal incontinence-sphincter ani repair: indications, techniques, outcome.

Authors:  Susan Galandiuk; Leslie A Roth; Quincy J Greene
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Endoanal ultrasound compared to anorectal manometry for the evaluation of fecal incontinence: a study of the effect these tests have on clinical outcome.

Authors:  Keri Hill; Shane Fanning; M Brian Fennerty; Douglas O Faigel
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.