BACKGROUND: Non-invasive fibrosis markers can distinguish between liver fibrosis stages in lieu of liver biopsy or imaging elastography. AIMS: To develop a sensitive, non-invasive, freely-available algorithm that differentiates between individual liver fibrosis stages in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients. METHODS: Chronic HCV patients (n = 355) at Cairo University Hospital, Egypt, with liver biopsy to determine fibrosis stage (METAVIR), were tested for preselected fibrosis markers. A novel multistage stepwise fibrosis classification algorithm (FibroSteps) was developed using random forest analysis for biomarker selection, and logistic regression for modelling. FibroSteps predicted fibrosis stage using four steps: Step 1 distinguished no(F0)/mild fibrosis(F1) vs. moderate(F2)/severe fibrosis(F3)/cirrhosis(F4); Step 2a distinguished F0 vs. F1; Step 2b distinguished F2 vs. F3/F4; and Step 3 distinguished F3 vs. F4. FibroSteps was developed using a randomly-selected training set (n = 234) and evaluated using the remaining patients (n = 118) as a validation set. RESULTS: Hyaluronic Acid, TGF-β1, α2-macroglobulin, MMP-2, Apolipoprotein-A1, Urea, MMP-1, alpha-fetoprotein, haptoglobin, RBCs, haemoglobin and TIMP-1 were selected into the models, which had areas under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 0.973, 0.923 (Step 1); 0.943, 0.872 (Step 2a); 0.916, 0.883 (Step 2b) and 0.944, 0.946 (Step 3), in the training and validation sets respectively. The final classification had accuracies of 94.9% (95% CI: 91.3-97.4%) and 89.8% (95% CI: 82.9-94.6%) for the training and validation sets respectively. CONCLUSIONS: FibroSteps, a freely available, non-invasive liver fibrosis classification, is accurate and can assist clinicians in making prognostic and therapeutic decisions. The statistical code for FibroSteps using R software is provided in the supplementary materials.
BACKGROUND: Non-invasive fibrosis markers can distinguish between liver fibrosis stages in lieu of liver biopsy or imaging elastography. AIMS: To develop a sensitive, non-invasive, freely-available algorithm that differentiates between individual liver fibrosis stages in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients. METHODS:Chronic HCVpatients (n = 355) at Cairo University Hospital, Egypt, with liver biopsy to determine fibrosis stage (METAVIR), were tested for preselected fibrosis markers. A novel multistage stepwise fibrosis classification algorithm (FibroSteps) was developed using random forest analysis for biomarker selection, and logistic regression for modelling. FibroSteps predicted fibrosis stage using four steps: Step 1 distinguished no(F0)/mild fibrosis(F1) vs. moderate(F2)/severe fibrosis(F3)/cirrhosis(F4); Step 2a distinguished F0 vs. F1; Step 2b distinguished F2 vs. F3/F4; and Step 3 distinguished F3 vs. F4. FibroSteps was developed using a randomly-selected training set (n = 234) and evaluated using the remaining patients (n = 118) as a validation set. RESULTS:Hyaluronic Acid, TGF-β1, α2-macroglobulin, MMP-2, Apolipoprotein-A1, Urea, MMP-1, alpha-fetoprotein, haptoglobin, RBCs, haemoglobin and TIMP-1 were selected into the models, which had areas under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 0.973, 0.923 (Step 1); 0.943, 0.872 (Step 2a); 0.916, 0.883 (Step 2b) and 0.944, 0.946 (Step 3), in the training and validation sets respectively. The final classification had accuracies of 94.9% (95% CI: 91.3-97.4%) and 89.8% (95% CI: 82.9-94.6%) for the training and validation sets respectively. CONCLUSIONS: FibroSteps, a freely available, non-invasive liver fibrosis classification, is accurate and can assist clinicians in making prognostic and therapeutic decisions. The statistical code for FibroSteps using R software is provided in the supplementary materials.
Authors: Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les M Irwig; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet; Jeroen G Lijmer Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2003-01-07 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: A M Tiggelman; W Boers; A F Moorman; P A de Boer; C M Van der Loos; J P Rotmans; R A Chamuleau Journal: Hepatology Date: 1996-05 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Gregory D Kirk; Jacquie Astemborski; Shruti H Mehta; Chuck Spoler; Cedric Fisher; Danisha Allen; Yvonne Higgins; Richard D Moore; Nezem Afdhal; Michael Torbenson; Mark Sulkowski; David L Thomas Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2009-04-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Laura Pérez-Is; Julio Collazos; Belén de la Fuente; Luis Morano; Maria Rivas-Carmenado; Manuel Rodriguez; Adolfo Romero-Favela; Galilea de Jesús Fonseca-González; Santiago Melón; Eulalia Valle-Garay; Víctor Asensi Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-03-09 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Mohamed A Alboraie; Mahmoud E Afifi; Fathy G Elghamry; Helmy A Shalaby; Gamal E Elshennawy; Ahmed A Abdelaziz; Mohamed U Shaheen; Amany R Abo El-Seoud Journal: Hepat Mon Date: 2013-06-16 Impact factor: 0.660