BACKGROUND: Transient elastography is a novel, noninvasive method for staging liver fibrosis. We compared elastography with histologic methods among hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-HCV-coinfected participants in an urban, predominantly black study population. METHODS: Participants recruited from the AIDS Linked to the Intravenous Experience and the Johns Hopkins HIV Clinical Cohort studies underwent elastography to determine liver stiffness measurements. Liver biopsy specimens were staged F0-F4 in accordance with the Metavir score. Diagnostic accuracy and determination of liver stiffness cutoff values, compared with histologic methods, were determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis. Logistic regression methods identified parameters associated with discordant classification status. RESULTS: Of 192 participants, 139 (72%) were coinfected with HIV and HCV, 121 (63%) had insignificant fibrosis, and 48 (25%) had cirrhosis. Overall, the area-under-the-curve receiver operating characteristic was 0.87 for detection of both significant fibrosis (95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.92) and cirrhosis (95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.93). With use of cutoff values of 9.3 kPa for fibrosis and 12.3 kPa for cirrhosis, 79%-83% of participants were correctly classified by liver stiffness measurement (compared with histologic methods); accuracy appeared to be higher among HIV-uninfected participants than among HIV-infected participants. Most discordance occurred when liver stiffness measurements indicated liver disease and histologic examination did not (in 16% of participants); the patients with these discordant results were more likely to have attributes that increased the odds of significant fibrosis, such as elevated serum fibrosis markers or HIV-related immunosuppression, compared with persons in whom low fibrosis was predicted by both examination of a biopsy specimen and elastography. CONCLUSIONS: For most HCV-infected persons, fibrosis stage predicted by elastography is similar to that predicted by examination of a biopsy specimen. Elastography-based measurement of liver stiffness holds promise to expand liver disease screening and monitoring, particularly among injection drug users.
BACKGROUND: Transient elastography is a novel, noninvasive method for staging liver fibrosis. We compared elastography with histologic methods among hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-HCV-coinfectedparticipants in an urban, predominantly black study population. METHODS:Participants recruited from the AIDS Linked to the Intravenous Experience and the Johns Hopkins HIV Clinical Cohort studies underwent elastography to determine liver stiffness measurements. Liver biopsy specimens were staged F0-F4 in accordance with the Metavir score. Diagnostic accuracy and determination of liver stiffness cutoff values, compared with histologic methods, were determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis. Logistic regression methods identified parameters associated with discordant classification status. RESULTS: Of 192 participants, 139 (72%) were coinfected with HIV and HCV, 121 (63%) had insignificant fibrosis, and 48 (25%) had cirrhosis. Overall, the area-under-the-curve receiver operating characteristic was 0.87 for detection of both significant fibrosis (95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.92) and cirrhosis (95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.93). With use of cutoff values of 9.3 kPa for fibrosis and 12.3 kPa for cirrhosis, 79%-83% of participants were correctly classified by liver stiffness measurement (compared with histologic methods); accuracy appeared to be higher among HIV-uninfectedparticipants than among HIV-infectedparticipants. Most discordance occurred when liver stiffness measurements indicated liver disease and histologic examination did not (in 16% of participants); the patients with these discordant results were more likely to have attributes that increased the odds of significant fibrosis, such as elevated serum fibrosis markers or HIV-related immunosuppression, compared with persons in whom low fibrosis was predicted by both examination of a biopsy specimen and elastography. CONCLUSIONS: For most HCV-infectedpersons, fibrosis stage predicted by elastography is similar to that predicted by examination of a biopsy specimen. Elastography-based measurement of liver stiffness holds promise to expand liver disease screening and monitoring, particularly among injection drug users.
Authors: D L Thomas; J Astemborski; R M Rai; F A Anania; M Schaeffer; N Galai; K Nolt; K E Nelson; S A Strathdee; L Johnson; O Laeyendecker; J Boitnott; L E Wilson; D Vlahov Journal: JAMA Date: 2000-07-26 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Rudra Rai; Lucy E Wilson; Jacquie Astemborski; Frank Anania; Michael Torbenson; Charles Spoler; David Vlahov; Steffanie A Strathdee; John Boitnott; Kenrad E Nelson; David L Thomas Journal: Hepatology Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: James J Goedert; M Elaine Eyster; Michael M Lederman; Titica Mandalaki; Philippe De Moerloose; Gilbert C White; Anne L Angiolillo; Naomi L C Luban; Kenneth E Sherman; Marilyn Manco-Johnson; Liliana Preiss; Cindy Leissinger; Craig M Kessler; Alan R Cohen; Donna DiMichele; Margaret W Hilgartner; Louis M Aledort; Barbara L Kroner; Philip S Rosenberg; Angelos Hatzakis Journal: Blood Date: 2002-09-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Shruti H Mehta; Becky L Genberg; Jacquie Astemborski; Ravi Kavasery; Gregory D Kirk; David Vlahov; Steffanie A Strathdee; David L Thomas Journal: J Community Health Date: 2008-06
Authors: Chun-Tao Wai; Joel K Greenson; Robert J Fontana; John D Kalbfleisch; Jorge A Marrero; Hari S Conjeevaram; Anna S-F Lok Journal: Hepatology Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Armen Sarvazyan; Timothy J Hall; Matthew W Urban; Mostafa Fatemi; Salavat R Aglyamov; Brian S Garra Journal: Curr Med Imaging Rev Date: 2011-11
Authors: Shailja Shah; Yifei Ma; Rebecca Scherzer; Greg Huhn; Audrey L French; Michael Plankey; Marion G Peters; Carl Grunfeld; Phyllis C Tien Journal: AIDS Date: 2015-07-17 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Elliot B Tapper; Eric B Cohen; Keyur Patel; Bruce Bacon; Stuart Gordon; Eric Lawitz; David Nelson; Imad A Nasser; Tracy Challies; Nezam Afdhal Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2012-01-28 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Joseph K Lim; Janet P Tate; Shawn L Fultz; Joseph L Goulet; Joseph Conigliaro; Kendall J Bryant; Adam J Gordon; Cynthia Gibert; David Rimland; Matthew Bidwell Goetz; Marina B Klein; David A Fiellin; Amy C Justice; Vincent Lo Re Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2014-02-25 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Yu Liu; Jingfei Liu; Brett Z Fite; Josquin Foiret; Asaf Ilovitsh; J Kent Leach; Erik Dumont; Charles F Caskey; Katherine W Ferrara Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2017-04-20 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Mark Hull; Pierre Giguère; Marina Klein; Stephen Shafran; Alice Tseng; Pierre Côté; Marc Poliquin; Curtis Cooper Journal: Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol Date: 2014 Impact factor: 2.471
Authors: Basile Njei; Thomas R McCarty; Jeffrey Luk; Oforbuike Ewelukwa; Ivo Ditah; Joseph K Lim Journal: J Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 4.029
Authors: Gregory D Kirk; Shruti H Mehta; Jacquie Astemborski; Noya Galai; Jonathan Washington; Yvonne Higgins; Ashwin Balagopal; David L Thomas Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2013-05-07 Impact factor: 25.391