Literature DB >> 23508825

Extended pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer: a 20-year audit in a single center.

F Abdollah1, N Suardi, A Gallina, M Bianchi, M Tutolo, N Passoni, N Fossati, M Sun, P dell'Oglio, A Salonia, P I Karakiewicz, P Rigatti, F Montorsi, A Briganti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We set to assess the impact of stage migration in prostate cancer (PCa) on the evolution of the pN1 rate and tumor characteristics in pN1 patients over the last two decades. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated 5274 PCa patients treated with radical prostatectomy and anatomically extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) between 1990 and 2010. Year-per-year trends of clinical and pathological characteristics were examined. Logistic regression analyses addressed predictors of pN1.
RESULTS: The median number of lymph nodes (LNs) removed was 16.0. Overall, the pN1 rate was 13.8% and it decreased from 26.1% to 15.6% between 1990 and 2010 (P < 0.001). For the same period, the pN1 rate changed from 0% to 3% in the low-risk PCa, from 20% to 7% in the intermediate-risk PCa, and from 33% to 44% in the high-risk PCa (P ≤ 0.01). In pN1 patients, pre-operative cancer characteristics and the median number of positive LNs (three in 1990 versus two in 2010) did not significantly change overtime (all P ≥ 0.1). Year of surgery was not an independent predictor of pN1 (all P ≥ 0.06).
CONCLUSION: Based on ePLND outcomes, contemporary patients with intermediate- and high-risk PCa's still harbor a significant LNI risk. In consequence, stage migration does not justify omitting or limiting the extent of PLND in these individuals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  extended pelvic lymph node dissection; lymph node invasion; prostate cancer; risk groups; stage migration

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23508825     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  17 in total

Review 1.  Sentinel node evaluation in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ramkishen Narayanan; Timothy G Wilson
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 5.150

2.  Preoperative multiparametric MRI of the prostate for the prediction of lymph node metastases in prostate cancer patients treated with extended pelvic lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Giorgio Brembilla; Paolo Dell'Oglio; Armando Stabile; Alessandro Ambrosi; Giulia Cristel; Lisa Brunetti; Anna Damascelli; Massimo Freschi; Antonio Esposito; Alberto Briganti; Francesco Montorsi; Alessandro Del Maschio; Francesco De Cobelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Impact of stage migration and practice changes on high-risk prostate cancer: results from patients treated with radical prostatectomy over the last two decades.

Authors:  Nicola Fossati; Niccolò M Passoni; Marco Moschini; Giorgio Gandaglia; Alessandro Larcher; Massimo Freschi; Giorgio Guazzoni; Daniel D Sjoberg; Andrew J Vickers; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Contemporary Patterns of Care and Outcomes of Men Found to Have Lymph Node Metastases at the Time of Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Piotr Zareba; James Eastham; Peter T Scardino; Karim Touijer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Significance of examined lymph-node count in accurate staging and long-term survival in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: a population-based study.

Authors:  Cheng Chen; Jie Shen; Zhaoyu Xing; Changchuan Jiang; Linkun Hu; Li Cui; Dong Xue; Xiaozhou He; Renfang Xu
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 6.  Is extended pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer the only recommended option? A systematic over-view of the literature.

Authors:  Thomas Rees; Nicholas Raison; Mohammed Iqbal Sheikh; Zahra Jaffry; Sanjeev Madaan; Ben Challacombe; Kamran Ahmed; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2016-12

7.  Lymph node-positive prostate cancer after robotic prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  Avinash Chenam; Jaspreet S Parihar; Nora Ruel; Sumanta Pal; Yvonne Avila; Jonathan Yamzon; Clayton Lau; Bertram Yuh
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-09-13

8.  Is More Always Better? An Assessment of the Impact of Lymph Node Yield on Outcome for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer with Low/Intermediate Risk Pathology (pT2-3a/pN0) Managed with Prostatectomy Alone.

Authors:  Steven N Seyedin; Darrion L Mitchell; Sarah L Mott; J Kyle Russo; Chad R Tracy; Anthony N Snow; Jessica R Parkhurst; Mark C Smith; John M Buatti; John M Watkins
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 9.  The Role of Radiotherapy After Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Giorgio Gandaglia; Cesare Cozzarini; Alexandre Mottrie; Alberto Bossi; Nicola Fossati; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.075

10.  Determinants of long-term survival of patients with locally advanced prostate cancer: the role of extensive pelvic lymph node dissection.

Authors:  M Moschini; N Fossati; F Abdollah; G Gandaglia; V Cucchiara; P Dell'Oglio; S Luzzago; S F Shariat; F Dehò; A Salonia; F Montorsi; A Briganti
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 5.554

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.