BACKGROUND: Although controversial, evidence suggests statins may reduce the risk of advanced prostate cancer (PC), and recently statin use was associated with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) reductions among men without PC. The authors sought to examine the association between statin use and PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS: The authors examined 1319 men treated with RP from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) Database. Time to PSA recurrence was compared between users and nonusers of statin at surgery using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for multiple clinical and pathological features. RESULTS: In total, 236 (18%) men were taking statins at RP. Median follow-up was 24 months for statin users and 38 for nonusers. Statin users were older (P<.001) and underwent RP more recently (P<.001). Statin users were diagnosed at lower clinical stages (P=.009) and with lower PSA levels (P=.04). However, statin users tended to have higher biopsy Gleason scores (P=.002). After adjusting for multiple clinical and pathological factors, statin use was associated with a 30% lower risk of PSA recurrence (hazard ratio "HR", 0.70; 95% confidence interval "CI", 0.50-0.97; P=.03), which was dose dependent (relative to no statin use; dose equivalent<simvastatin 20 mg: HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.66-1.73; P=.78; dose equivalent=simvastatin 20 mg: HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.32-1.00; P=.05; dose equivalent>simvastatin 20 mg: HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.27-0.93; P=.03). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of men undergoing RP, statin use was associated with a dose-dependent reduction in the risk of biochemical recurrence. If confirmed in other studies, these findings suggest statins may slow PC progression after RP. Copyright (c) 2010 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND: Although controversial, evidence suggests statins may reduce the risk of advanced prostate cancer (PC), and recently statin use was associated with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) reductions among men without PC. The authors sought to examine the association between statin use and PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS: The authors examined 1319 men treated with RP from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) Database. Time to PSA recurrence was compared between users and nonusers of statin at surgery using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for multiple clinical and pathological features. RESULTS: In total, 236 (18%) men were taking statins at RP. Median follow-up was 24 months for statin users and 38 for nonusers. Statin users were older (P<.001) and underwent RP more recently (P<.001). Statin users were diagnosed at lower clinical stages (P=.009) and with lower PSA levels (P=.04). However, statin users tended to have higher biopsy Gleason scores (P=.002). After adjusting for multiple clinical and pathological factors, statin use was associated with a 30% lower risk of PSA recurrence (hazard ratio "HR", 0.70; 95% confidence interval "CI", 0.50-0.97; P=.03), which was dose dependent (relative to no statin use; dose equivalent<simvastatin 20 mg: HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.66-1.73; P=.78; dose equivalent=simvastatin 20 mg: HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.32-1.00; P=.05; dose equivalent>simvastatin 20 mg: HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.27-0.93; P=.03). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of men undergoing RP, statin use was associated with a dose-dependent reduction in the risk of biochemical recurrence. If confirmed in other studies, these findings suggest statins may slow PC progression after RP. Copyright (c) 2010 American Cancer Society.
Authors: Ilir Agalliu; Claudia A Salinas; Philip D Hansten; Elaine A Ostrander; Janet L Stanford Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2008-06-12 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Robert J Hamilton; Kenneth C Goldberg; Elizabeth A Platz; Stephen J Freedland Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2008-10-28 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Gary D Friedman; E Dawn Flick; Natalia Udaltsova; James Chan; Charles P Quesenberry; Laurel A Habel Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: L Spencer Krane; Sanjeev A Kaul; Hans J Stricker; James O Peabody; Mani Menon; Piyush K Agarwal Journal: J Urol Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Huarong Huang; Xiao-Xing Cui; Shaohua Chen; Susan Goodin; Yue Liu; Yan He; Dongli Li; Hong Wang; Jeremiah Van Doren; Robert S Dipaola; Allan H Conney; Xi Zheng Journal: Anticancer Res Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 2.480
Authors: Melissa A Babcook; Sanjeev Shukla; Pingfu Fu; Edwin J Vazquez; Michelle A Puchowicz; Joseph P Molter; Christine Z Oak; Gregory T MacLennan; Chris A Flask; Daniel J Lindner; Yvonne Parker; Firouz Daneshgari; Sanjay Gupta Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2014-08-13 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Emma H Allott; Lauren E Howard; Matthew R Cooperberg; Christopher J Kane; William J Aronson; Martha K Terris; Christopher L Amling; Stephen J Freedland Journal: BJU Int Date: 2014-05-08 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Katharine N Sourbeer; Lauren E Howard; Gerald L Andriole; Daniel M Moreira; Ramiro Castro-Santamaria; Stephen J Freedland; Adriana C Vidal Journal: BJU Int Date: 2014-10-20 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Robert J Hamilton; Daniel Morilla; Fernando Cabrera; Michael Leapman; Ling Y Chen; Melanie Bernstein; A Ari Hakimi; Victor E Reuter; Paul Russo Journal: J Urol Date: 2013-11-26 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Saroj Niraula; Greg Pond; Ronald de Wit; Mario Eisenberger; Ian F Tannock; Anthony M Joshua Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2013 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.862