PURPOSE: The AO Spine Classification Group was established to propose a revised AO spine injury classification system. This paper provides details on the rationale, methodology, and results of the initial stage of the revision process for injuries of the thoracic and lumbar (TL) spine. METHODS: In a structured, iterative process involving five experienced spine trauma surgeons from various parts of the world, consecutive cases with TL injuries were classified independently by members of the classification group, and analyzed for classification reliability using the Kappa coefficient (κ) and for accuracy using latent class analysis. The reasons for disagreements were examined systematically during review meetings. In four successive sessions, the system was revised until consensus and sufficient reproducibility were achieved. RESULTS: The TL spine injury system is based on three main injury categories adapted from the original Magerl AO concept: A (compression), B (tension band), and C (displacement) type injuries. Type-A injuries include four subtypes (wedge-impaction/split-pincer/incomplete burst/complete burst); B-type injuries are divided between purely osseous and osseo-ligamentous disruptions; and C-type injuries are further categorized into three subtypes (hyperextension/translation/separation). There is no subgroup division. The reliability of injury types (A, B, C) was good (κ = 0.77). The surgeons' pairwise Kappa ranged from 0.69 to 0.90. Kappa coefficients κ for reliability of injury subtypes ranged from 0.26 to 0.78. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed TL spine injury system is based on clinically relevant parameters. Final evaluation data showed reasonable reliability and accuracy. Further validation of the proposed revised AO Classification requires follow-up evaluation sessions and documentation by more surgeons from different countries and backgrounds and is subject to modification based on clinical parameters during subsequent phases.
PURPOSE: The AO Spine Classification Group was established to propose a revised AO spine injury classification system. This paper provides details on the rationale, methodology, and results of the initial stage of the revision process for injuries of the thoracic and lumbar (TL) spine. METHODS: In a structured, iterative process involving five experienced spine trauma surgeons from various parts of the world, consecutive cases with TL injuries were classified independently by members of the classification group, and analyzed for classification reliability using the Kappa coefficient (κ) and for accuracy using latent class analysis. The reasons for disagreements were examined systematically during review meetings. In four successive sessions, the system was revised until consensus and sufficient reproducibility were achieved. RESULTS: The TL spine injury system is based on three main injury categories adapted from the original Magerl AO concept: A (compression), B (tension band), and C (displacement) type injuries. Type-A injuries include four subtypes (wedge-impaction/split-pincer/incomplete burst/complete burst); B-type injuries are divided between purely osseous and osseo-ligamentous disruptions; and C-type injuries are further categorized into three subtypes (hyperextension/translation/separation). There is no subgroup division. The reliability of injury types (A, B, C) was good (κ = 0.77). The surgeons' pairwise Kappa ranged from 0.69 to 0.90. Kappa coefficients κ for reliability of injury subtypes ranged from 0.26 to 0.78. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed TL spine injury system is based on clinically relevant parameters. Final evaluation data showed reasonable reliability and accuracy. Further validation of the proposed revised AO Classification requires follow-up evaluation sessions and documentation by more surgeons from different countries and backgrounds and is subject to modification based on clinical parameters during subsequent phases.
Authors: Y Raja Rampersaud; Charles Fisher; Jared Wilsey; Paul Arnold; Neel Anand; Chris M Bono; Andrew T Dailey; Marcel Dvorak; Michael G Fehlings; James S Harrop; F C Oner; Alexander R Vaccaro Journal: J Spinal Disord Tech Date: 2006-10
Authors: Alexander R Vaccaro; Steven C Zeiller; R John Hulbert; Paul A Anderson; Mitchel Harris; Rune Hedlund; James Harrop; Marcel Dvorak; Kirkham Wood; Michael G Fehlings; Charles Fisher; Ronald A Lehman; D Greg Anderson; Christopher M Bono; Timothy Kuklo; F C Oner Journal: J Spinal Disord Tech Date: 2005-06
Authors: F C Oner; L M P Ramos; R K J Simmermacher; P T D Kingma; C H Diekerhof; W J A Dhert; A J Verbout Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2002-01-29 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Jose J Diaz; Daniel C Cullinane; Daniel T Altman; Faran Bokhari; Joseph S Cheng; John Como; Oliver Gunter; Michele Holevar; Rebecca Jerome; Stanley J Kurek; Manuel Lorenzo; Vicente Mejia; Maurizio Miglietta; Patrick J O'Neill; Peter Rhee; Ronald Sing; Erik Streib; Steven Vaslef Journal: J Trauma Date: 2007-09
Authors: Peter G Whang; Alexander R Vaccaro; Kornelius A Poelstra; Alpesh A Patel; D Greg Anderson; Todd J Albert; Alan S Hilibrand; James S Harrop; Ashwini D Sharan; John K Ratliff; R John Hurlbert; Paul Anderson; Bizhan Aarabi; Lali H S Sekhon; Ralf Gahr; John A Carrino Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2007-04-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Bernhard Wilhelm Ullrich; Philipp Schenk; Ulrich J Spiegl; Thomas Mendel; Gunther Olaf Hofmann Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2018-10-19 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Henrik C Bäcker; J Turner Vosseller; Lorin Benneker; Markus Noger; Fabian Krause; Sven Hoppe; Moritz C Deml Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2019-03-18 Impact factor: 3.134