Literature DB >> 18073623

Practice management guidelines for the screening of thoracolumbar spine fracture.

Jose J Diaz1, Daniel C Cullinane, Daniel T Altman, Faran Bokhari, Joseph S Cheng, John Como, Oliver Gunter, Michele Holevar, Rebecca Jerome, Stanley J Kurek, Manuel Lorenzo, Vicente Mejia, Maurizio Miglietta, Patrick J O'Neill, Peter Rhee, Ronald Sing, Erik Streib, Steven Vaslef.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fractures to the thoracolumbar spine (TLS) commonly occur because of major trauma mechanisms. In one series, 4.4% of all patients arriving at a Level I trauma center were diagnosed as having TLS fracture. Approximately 19% to 50% of these fractures in the TLS region will be associated with neurologic damage to the spinal cord. To date there are no randomized studies and only a few prospective studies specifically addressing the subject. The Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma organization Practice Management Guidelines committee set out to develop an EBM guideline for the diagnosis of TLS fractures.
METHODS: A computerized search of the National Library of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health MEDLINE database was undertaken using the PubMed Entrez (www.pubmed.gov) interface. The primary search strategy was developed to retrieve English language articles focusing on diagnostic examination of potential TLS injury published between 1995 and March 2005. Articles were screened based on the following questions. (1) Does a patient who is awake, nonintoxicated, without distracting injuries require radiographic workup or a clinical examination only? (2) Does a patient with a distracting injury, altered mental status, or pain require radiographic examination? (3) Does the obtunded patient require radiographic examination?
RESULTS: Sixty-nine articles were identified after the initial screening process, all of which dealt with blunt injury to the TLS, along with clinical, radiographic, fluoroscopic, and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation. From this group, 32 articles were selected. The reviewers identified 27 articles that dealt with the initial evaluation of TLS injury after trauma.
CONCLUSION: Computed tomography (CT) scan imaging of the bony spine has advanced with helical and currently multidetector images to allow reformatted axial collimation of images into two-dimensional and three-dimensional images. As a result, bony injuries to the TLS are commonly being identified. Most blunt trauma patients require CT to screen for other injuries. This has allowed the single admitting series of CT scans to also include screening for bony spine injuries. However, all of the publications fail to clearly define the criteria used to decide who gets radiographs or CT scans. No study has carefully conducted long-term follow-up on all of their trauma patients to identify all cases of TLS injury missed in the acute setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18073623     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318142d2db

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  16 in total

Review 1.  The precision, accuracy and validity of detecting posterior ligamentous complex injuries of the thoracic and lumbar spine: a critical appraisal of the literature.

Authors:  Joost J van Middendorp; Alpesh A Patel; Michael Schuetz; Andrei F Joaquim
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Classifying thoracolumbar fractures: role of quantitative imaging.

Authors:  Fernando Ruiz Santiago; Pablo Tomás Muñoz; Elena Moya Sánchez; Marta Revelles Paniza; Alberto Martínez Martínez; Antonio Luis Pérez Abela
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-12

3.  Retrospective analysis of reasons and revision strategy for failed thoracolumbar fracture surgery by posterior approach: a series of 31 cases.

Authors:  Haiping Zhang; Tao Li; Honghui Sun; Jun Zhang; Dingjun Hao
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 3.940

4.  Imaging of the thoracic and lumbar spine in a high volume level 1 trauma center: are reformatted images of the spine essential for screening in blunt trauma?

Authors:  Aleksandr Rozenberg; Jonathan C Weinstein; Adam E Flanders; Pranshu Sharma
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-09-23

5.  AO spine injury classification system: a revision proposal for the thoracic and lumbar spine.

Authors:  Maximilian Reinhold; Laurent Audigé; Klaus John Schnake; Carlo Bellabarba; Li-Yang Dai; F Cumhur Oner
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging frequently changes classification of acute traumatic thoracolumbar spine injuries.

Authors:  Sebastian Winklhofer; Merly Thekkumthala-Sommer; Diethard Schmidt; Kaspar Rufibach; Clément M L Werner; Guido A Wanner; Hatem Alkadhi; Jürg Hodler; Gustav Andreisek
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  What should an ideal spinal injury classification system consist of? A methodological review and conceptual proposal for future classifications.

Authors:  Joost J van Middendorp; Laurent Audigé; Beate Hanson; Jens R Chapman; Allard J F Hosman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Prediction of blunt traumatic injuries and hospital admission based on history and physical exam.

Authors:  Alan L Beal; Mark N Ahrendt; Eric D Irwin; John W Lyng; Steven V Turner; Christopher A Beal; Matthew T Byrnes; Greg A Beilman
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Clinical effect of a novel transpedicular reducer for reduction and bone grafting combined with pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar burst fractures.

Authors:  Menghan Cai; Zhijun Xin; Weijun Kong; Qian Du; Wenjun Ji; Fujun Wu; Jin Li; Jialin He; Wenbo Liao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Can initial clinical assessment exclude thoracolumbar vertebral injury?

Authors:  Dinendra Singh Gill; Biswadev Mitra; Fairleigh Reeves; Peter A Cameron; Mark Fitzgerald; Susan Liew; Dinesh Varma
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 2.740

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.