STUDY QUESTION: Do genetic associations identified in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of age at menarche (AM) and age at natural menopause (ANM) replicate in women of diverse race/ancestry from the Population Architecture using Genomics and Epidemiology (PAGE) Study? SUMMARY ANSWER: We replicated GWAS reproductive trait single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in our European descent population and found that many SNPs were also associated with AM and ANM in populations of diverse ancestry. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Menarche and menopause mark the reproductive lifespan in women and are important risk factors for chronic diseases including obesity, cardiovascular disease and cancer. Both events are believed to be influenced by environmental and genetic factors, and vary in populations differing by genetic ancestry and geography. Most genetic variants associated with these traits have been identified in GWAS of European-descent populations. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A total of 42 251 women of diverse ancestry from PAGE were included in cross-sectional analyses of AM and ANM. MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: SNPs previously associated with ANM (n = 5 SNPs) and AM (n = 3 SNPs) in GWAS were genotyped in American Indians, African Americans, Asians, European Americans, Hispanics and Native Hawaiians. To test SNP associations with ANM or AM, we used linear regression models stratified by race/ethnicity and PAGE sub-study. Results were then combined in race-specific fixed effect meta-analyses for each outcome. For replication and generalization analyses, significance was defined at P < 0.01 for ANM analyses and P < 0.017 for AM analyses. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: We replicated findings for AM SNPs in the LIN28B locus and an intergenic region on 9q31 in European Americans. The LIN28B SNPs (rs314277 and rs314280) were also significantly associated with AM in Asians, but not in other race/ethnicity groups. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) patterns at this locus varied widely among the ancestral groups. With the exception of an intergenic SNP at 13q34, all ANM SNPs replicated in European Americans. Three were significantly associated with ANM in other race/ethnicity populations: rs2153157 (6p24.2/SYCP2L), rs365132 (5q35/UIMC1) and rs16991615 (20p12.3/MCM8). While rs1172822 (19q13/BRSK1) was not significant in the populations of non-European descent, effect sizes showed similar trends. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Lack of association for the GWAS SNPs in the non-European American groups may be due to differences in locus LD patterns between these groups and the European-descent populations included in the GWAS discovery studies; and in some cases, lower power may also contribute to non-significant findings. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The discovery of genetic variants associated with the reproductive traits provides an important opportunity to elucidate the biological mechanisms involved with normal variation and disorders of menarche and menopause. In this study we replicated most, but not all reported SNPs in European descent populations and examined the epidemiologic architecture of these early reported variants, describing their generalizability and effect size across differing ancestral populations. Such data will be increasingly important for prioritizing GWAS SNPs for follow-up in fine-mapping and resequencing studies, as well as in translational research.
STUDY QUESTION: Do genetic associations identified in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of age at menarche (AM) and age at natural menopause (ANM) replicate in women of diverse race/ancestry from the Population Architecture using Genomics and Epidemiology (PAGE) Study? SUMMARY ANSWER: We replicated GWAS reproductive trait single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in our European descent population and found that many SNPs were also associated with AM and ANM in populations of diverse ancestry. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Menarche and menopause mark the reproductive lifespan in women and are important risk factors for chronic diseases including obesity, cardiovascular disease and cancer. Both events are believed to be influenced by environmental and genetic factors, and vary in populations differing by genetic ancestry and geography. Most genetic variants associated with these traits have been identified in GWAS of European-descent populations. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A total of 42 251 women of diverse ancestry from PAGE were included in cross-sectional analyses of AM and ANM. MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: SNPs previously associated with ANM (n = 5 SNPs) and AM (n = 3 SNPs) in GWAS were genotyped in American Indians, African Americans, Asians, European Americans, Hispanics and Native Hawaiians. To test SNP associations with ANM or AM, we used linear regression models stratified by race/ethnicity and PAGE sub-study. Results were then combined in race-specific fixed effect meta-analyses for each outcome. For replication and generalization analyses, significance was defined at P < 0.01 for ANM analyses and P < 0.017 for AM analyses. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: We replicated findings for AM SNPs in the LIN28B locus and an intergenic region on 9q31 in European Americans. The LIN28B SNPs (rs314277 and rs314280) were also significantly associated with AM in Asians, but not in other race/ethnicity groups. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) patterns at this locus varied widely among the ancestral groups. With the exception of an intergenic SNP at 13q34, all ANM SNPs replicated in European Americans. Three were significantly associated with ANM in other race/ethnicity populations: rs2153157 (6p24.2/SYCP2L), rs365132 (5q35/UIMC1) and rs16991615 (20p12.3/MCM8). While rs1172822 (19q13/BRSK1) was not significant in the populations of non-European descent, effect sizes showed similar trends. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Lack of association for the GWAS SNPs in the non-European American groups may be due to differences in locus LD patterns between these groups and the European-descent populations included in the GWAS discovery studies; and in some cases, lower power may also contribute to non-significant findings. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The discovery of genetic variants associated with the reproductive traits provides an important opportunity to elucidate the biological mechanisms involved with normal variation and disorders of menarche and menopause. In this study we replicated most, but not all reported SNPs in European descent populations and examined the epidemiologic architecture of these early reported variants, describing their generalizability and effect size across differing ancestral populations. Such data will be increasingly important for prioritizing GWAS SNPs for follow-up in fine-mapping and resequencing studies, as well as in translational research.
Entities:
Keywords:
genome-wide association study; menarche; menopause; race/ethnicity; single nucleotide polymorphism
Authors: C Hayward; J D Killen; D M Wilson; L D Hammer; I F Litt; H C Kraemer; F Haydel; A Varady; C B Taylor Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 1997-02 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Kylee L Spencer; Jennifer Malinowski; Cara L Carty; Nora Franceschini; Lindsay Fernández-Rhodes; Alicia Young; Iona Cheng; Marylyn D Ritchie; Christopher A Haiman; Lynne Wilkens; Tara C Matise; Christopher S Carlson; Kathleen Brennan; Amy Park; Aleksandar Rajkovic; Lucia A Hindorff; Steven Buyske; Dana C Crawford Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-02-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Christopher S Carlson; Tara C Matise; Kari E North; Christopher A Haiman; Megan D Fesinmeyer; Steven Buyske; Fredrick R Schumacher; Ulrike Peters; Nora Franceschini; Marylyn D Ritchie; David J Duggan; Kylee L Spencer; Logan Dumitrescu; Charles B Eaton; Fridtjof Thomas; Alicia Young; Cara Carty; Gerardo Heiss; Loic Le Marchand; Dana C Crawford; Lucia A Hindorff; Charles L Kooperberg Journal: PLoS Biol Date: 2013-09-17 Impact factor: 8.029
Authors: Michelle A Wood-Trageser; Fatih Gurbuz; Svetlana A Yatsenko; Elizabeth P Jeffries; L Damla Kotan; Urvashi Surti; Deborah M Ketterer; Jelena Matic; Jacqueline Chipkin; Huaiyang Jiang; Michael A Trakselis; A Kemal Topaloglu; Aleksandar Rajkovic Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2014-12-04 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Stephanie A Bien; Genevieve L Wojcik; Chani J Hodonsky; Christopher R Gignoux; Iona Cheng; Tara C Matise; Ulrike Peters; Eimear E Kenny; Kari E North Journal: Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet Date: 2019-04-12 Impact factor: 8.929
Authors: Saleh AlAsiri; Sulman Basit; Michelle A Wood-Trageser; Svetlana A Yatsenko; Elizabeth P Jeffries; Urvashi Surti; Deborah M Ketterer; Sibtain Afzal; Khushnooda Ramzan; Muhammad Faiyaz-Ul Haque; Huaiyang Jiang; Michael A Trakselis; Aleksandar Rajkovic Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2014-12-01 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Sara M Willems; Belinda K Cornes; Jennifer A Brody; Alanna C Morrison; Leonard Lipovich; Marco Dauriz; Yuning Chen; Ching-Ti Liu; Denis V Rybin; Richard A Gibbs; Donna Muzny; James S Pankow; Bruce M Psaty; Eric Boerwinkle; Jerome I Rotter; David S Siscovick; Ramachandran S Vasan; Robert C Kaplan; Aaron Isaacs; Josée Dupuis; Cornelia M van Duijn; James B Meigs Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2016-02-10 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: Jian Zhou; Paula Stein; N Adrian Leu; Lukáš Chmátal; Jiangyang Xue; Jun Ma; Xiaoyan Huang; Michael A Lampson; Richard M Schultz; P Jeremy Wang Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2015-09-11 Impact factor: 6.150