OBJECTIVES: Emerging proteomics techniques can be used to establish proteomic outcome signatures and to identify candidate biomarkers for survival following traumatic injury. We applied high-resolution liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and multiplex cytokine analysis to profile the plasma proteome of survivors and nonsurvivors of massive burn injury to determine the proteomic survival signature following a major burn injury. DESIGN: Proteomic discovery study. SETTING: Five burn hospitals across the United States. PATIENTS: Thirty-two burn patients (16 nonsurvivors and 16 survivors), 19-89 years old, were admitted within 96 hours of injury to the participating hospitals with burns covering more than 20% of the total body surface area and required at least one surgical intervention. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We found differences in circulating levels of 43 proteins involved in the acute-phase response, hepatic signaling, the complement cascade, inflammation, and insulin resistance. Thirty-two of the proteins identified were not previously known to play a role in the response to burn. Interleukin-4, interleukin-8, granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor, monocyte chemotactic protein-1, and β2-microglobulin correlated well with survival and may serve as clinical biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the utility of these techniques for establishing proteomic survival signatures and for use as a discovery tool to identify candidate biomarkers for survival. This is the first clinical application of a high-throughput, large-scale liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based quantitative plasma proteomic approach for biomarker discovery for the prediction of patient outcome following burn, trauma, or critical illness.
OBJECTIVES: Emerging proteomics techniques can be used to establish proteomic outcome signatures and to identify candidate biomarkers for survival following traumatic injury. We applied high-resolution liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and multiplex cytokine analysis to profile the plasma proteome of survivors and nonsurvivors of massive burn injury to determine the proteomic survival signature following a major burn injury. DESIGN: Proteomic discovery study. SETTING: Five burn hospitals across the United States. PATIENTS: Thirty-two burn patients (16 nonsurvivors and 16 survivors), 19-89 years old, were admitted within 96 hours of injury to the participating hospitals with burns covering more than 20% of the total body surface area and required at least one surgical intervention. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We found differences in circulating levels of 43 proteins involved in the acute-phase response, hepatic signaling, the complement cascade, inflammation, and insulin resistance. Thirty-two of the proteins identified were not previously known to play a role in the response to burn. Interleukin-4, interleukin-8, granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor, monocyte chemotactic protein-1, and β2-microglobulin correlated well with survival and may serve as clinical biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the utility of these techniques for establishing proteomic survival signatures and for use as a discovery tool to identify candidate biomarkers for survival. This is the first clinical application of a high-throughput, large-scale liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based quantitative plasma proteomic approach for biomarker discovery for the prediction of patient outcome following burn, trauma, or critical illness.
Authors: Tao Liu; Wei-Jun Qian; Heather M Mottaz; Marina A Gritsenko; Angela D Norbeck; Ronald J Moore; Samuel O Purvine; David G Camp; Richard D Smith Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2006-07-19 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Celeste C Finnerty; David N Herndon; Rene Przkora; Clifford T Pereira; Hermes M Oliveira; Dulciene M M Queiroz; Andreia M C Rocha; Marc G Jeschke Journal: Shock Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Wei-Jun Qian; Matthew E Monroe; Tao Liu; Jon M Jacobs; Gordon A Anderson; Yufeng Shen; Ronald J Moore; David J Anderson; Rui Zhang; Steve E Calvano; Stephen F Lowry; Wenzhong Xiao; Lyle L Moldawer; Ronald W Davis; Ronald G Tompkins; David G Camp; Richard D Smith Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2005-03-07 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Wei-Jun Qian; Tao Liu; Vladislav A Petyuk; Marina A Gritsenko; Brianne O Petritis; Ashoka D Polpitiya; Amit Kaushal; Wenzhong Xiao; Celeste C Finnerty; Marc G Jeschke; Navdeep Jaitly; Matthew E Monroe; Ronald J Moore; Lyle L Moldawer; Ronald W Davis; Ronald G Tompkins; David N Herndon; David G Camp; Richard D Smith Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Celeste C Finnerty; Karel D Capek; Charles Voigt; Gabriel Hundeshagen; Janos Cambiaso-Daniel; Craig Porter; Linda E Sousse; Amina El Ayadi; Ramon Zapata-Sirvent; Ashley N Guillory; Oscar E Suman; David N Herndon Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Jeffrey S Upperman; John C Bucuvalas; Felicia N Williams; Bruce A Cairns; Charles S Cox; Allan Doctor; Robert F Tamburro Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Sudha P Jayaraman; Rahul J Anand; Jonathan H DeAntonio; Martin Mangino; Michel B Aboutanos; Vigneshwar Kasirajan; Rao R Ivatury; Alex B Valadka; Olena Glushakova; Ronald L Hayes; Lorin M Bachmann; Gretchen M Brophy; Daniel Contaifer; Urszula O Warncke; Donald F Brophy; Dayanjan S Wijesinghe Journal: Shock Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Marc G Jeschke; Ruxandra Pinto; Robert Kraft; Avery B Nathens; Celeste C Finnerty; Richard L Gamelli; Nicole S Gibran; Matthew B Klein; Brett D Arnoldo; Ronald G Tompkins; David N Herndon Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Robert Kraft; David N Herndon; Celeste C Finnerty; Robert A Cox; Juquan Song; Marc G Jeschke Journal: Shock Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Juan C Mira; Benjamin E Szpila; Dina C Nacionales; Maria-Cecilia Lopez; Lori F Gentile; Brittany J Mathias; Erin L Vanzant; Ricardo Ungaro; David Holden; Martin D Rosenthal; Jaimar Rincon; Patrick T Verdugo; Shawn D Larson; Frederick A Moore; Scott C Brakenridge; Alicia M Mohr; Henry V Baker; Lyle L Moldawer; Philip A Efron Journal: Physiol Genomics Date: 2015-11-17 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Alexander T Limkakeng; Andrew A Monte; Christopher Kabrhel; Michael Puskarich; Laura Heitsch; Ephraim L Tsalik; Nathan I Shapiro Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2016-10-03 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Johanna Hästbacka; Filip Fredén; Maarit Hult; Maria Bergquist; Erika Wilkman; Jyrki Vuola; Timo Sorsa; Taina Tervahartiala; Fredrik Huss Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-05-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Marc G Jeschke; Margriet E van Baar; Mashkoor A Choudhry; Kevin K Chung; Nicole S Gibran; Sarvesh Logsetty Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2020-02-13 Impact factor: 52.329