Literature DB >> 23506918

Efficacy and predictability of laser in situ keratomileusis for low astigmatism of 0.75 diopter or less.

Andreas Frings1, Toam Katz, Gisbert Richard, Vasyl Druchkiv, Stephan J Linke.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the refractive and visual outcomes of wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in myopic eyes with low astigmatism of 0.75 diopter (D) or less.
SETTING: University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany, and Care Vision private clinics, Germany and Austria.
DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional data analysis.
METHODS: This study comprised consecutive myopic patients with a preoperative refractive cylinder of 0.75 D or less and a preoperative subjective sphere between -2.75 D and -11.50 D. Three subgroups were formed based on preoperative refractive cylinder magnitude (0.25 D, 0.50 D, and 0.75 D). Manifest refraction, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), and corrected distance visual acuity were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively. The astigmatic changes were determined using Alpins vector analysis.
RESULTS: This study enrolled 448 eyes of 448 patients (145 men, 303 women; mean age at surgery 37.8 years ± 9.4 [SD]). By 4 months (mean 116.8 ± 27.7 days) postoperatively, the mean UDVA was 0.10 ± 0.13 logMAR and the mean manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) -0.05 ± 0.68 D. There was no statistically significant difference in efficacy or safety between the preoperative cylinder groups. Astigmatic overcorrection for a preoperative cylinder of 0.25 D and 0.50 D was suggested by the correction index, the magnitude of error, the index of success, and the flattening index.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the mean UDVA and mean MRSE obtained by the 4-month follow-up were appropriate, a preoperative cylinder of 0.50 D or less was significantly overcorrected. Accordingly, caution should be used when considering full astigmatic correction for manifest cylinder of 0.50 D or less.
Copyright © 2013 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23506918     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.09.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  11 in total

1.  Do air pressure and wind speed influence the outcome of myopic laser refractive surgery? Results from the Hamburg Weather Study.

Authors:  Ines Neuhaus-Richard; Andreas Frings; Felix Ament; Isabel Caroline Görsch; Vasyl Druchkiv; Toam Katz; Stephan Johannes Linke; Gisbert Richard
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Comparative analysis of the efficacy of astigmatic correction after wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized LASIK in low and moderate myopic eyes.

Authors:  Mounir A Khalifa; Mahmoud F Alsahn; Mohamed Shafik Shaheen; David P Pinero
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  LASIK versus PRK for high astigmatism.

Authors:  Michael Mimouni; Russell Pokroy; Gilad Rabina; Igor Kaiserman
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Effect of Postoperative Ocular Residual Astigmatism (ORA) on Treatment Outcome After Myopic Laser in situ Keratomileusis (LASIK).

Authors:  Johanna Nöthel; Toam Katz; Vasyl Druchkiv; Andreas Frings
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-23

5.  Laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis with mitomycin C for myopic astigmatism ≥2.00 diopters using a Zeiss MEL 80 Excimer.

Authors:  A Frings; B Vidic; Y El-Shabrawi; N Ardjomand
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  Laser in situ keratomileusis for astigmatism ≤ 0.75 diopter combined with low myopia: a retrospective data analysis.

Authors:  Toam Katz; Andreas Frings; Stephan J Linke; Gisbert Richard; Vasyl Druchkiv; Johannes Steinberg
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 2.209

7.  LASIK for spherical refractive myopia: effect of topographic astigmatism (ocular residual astigmatism, ORA) on refractive outcome.

Authors:  Andreas Frings; Gisbert Richard; Johannes Steinberg; Christos Skevas; Vasyl Druchkiv; Toam Katz; Stephan J Linke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Vector analysis of low to moderate astigmatism with small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): results of a 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  Jiamei Zhang; Yan Wang; Wenjing Wu; Lulu Xu; Xiaojing Li; Rui Dou
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 2.209

9.  Effect of location of opening incision on astigmatic correction after small-incision lenticule extraction.

Authors:  Tommy C Y Chan; Alex Lk Ng; George P M Cheng; Zheng Wang; Victor C P Woo; Vishal Jhanji
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Do outside temperature and sunlight duration influence the outcome of laser refractive surgery? Results from the Hamburg Weather Study.

Authors:  Ines Neuhaus-Richard; Andreas Frings; Isabel Caroline Görsch; Vasyl Druchkiv; Toam Katz; Stephan Johannes Linke; Gisbert Richard
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-06-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.