Literature DB >> 23506206

Are cervical and breast cancer screening programmes equitable? The case of women with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

V Cobigo1, H Ouellette-Kuntz, R Balogh, F Leung, E Lin, Y Lunsky.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Effective cancer screening must be available for all eligible individuals without discrimination. Lower rates of cervical and breast cancer screening have been reported in certain groups compared with women from the general population, such as women with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). Research on the factors explaining those observed differences is crucial to determine whether practices are unfair and could be improved. The aim of this population-based study was to describe cancer screening utilisation by women with IDD in Ontario, Canada compared with other women in Ontario. The specific objectives were (1) to estimate the rates of cervical and breast cancer screening among eligible women with IDD in Ontario; (2) to compare the rates of cervical and breast cancer screening between eligible women with and without IDD; and (3) to examine if any observed differences between women with and without IDD persist after factors such as age, socio-economic status, rurality and healthcare utilisation are accounted for.
METHOD: This study draws women with IDD from an entire population, and draws a randomly selected comparison group from the same population. It controls for important confounders in cancer screening within the limitations of the data sources. The study was conducted using health administrative databases and registries in Ontario, Canada. Two cohorts were created: a cohort of all women identified as having an IDD and a cohort consisting of a random sample of 20% of the women without IDD.
RESULTS: The proportion of women with IDD who are not screened for cervical cancer is nearly twice what it is in the women without IDD, and 1.5 times what it is for mammography.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that women with IDD experience inequities in their access to cancer screening. Public health interventions targeting this population should be implemented.
© 2013 The Authors. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research © 2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23506206     DOI: 10.1111/jir.12035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res        ISSN: 0964-2633


  17 in total

1.  Comprehensive preventive care assessments for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities: Part 1: How do we know if it is happening?

Authors:  Glenys Smith; Hélène Ouellette-Kuntz; Michael Green
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Primary care of adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities: 2018 Canadian consensus guidelines.

Authors:  William F Sullivan; Heidi Diepstra; John Heng; Shara Ally; Elspeth Bradley; Ian Casson; Brian Hennen; Maureen Kelly; Marika Korossy; Karen McNeil; Dara Abells; Khush Amaria; Kerry Boyd; Meg Gemmill; Elizabeth Grier; Natalie Kennie-Kaulbach; Mackenzie Ketchell; Jessica Ladouceur; Amanda Lepp; Yona Lunsky; Shirley McMillan; Ullanda Niel; Samantha Sacks; Sarah Shea; Katherine Stringer; Kyle Sue; Sandra Witherbee
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Capsule Commentary on Alagoz et al., Benefits and Harms of Mammography Screening for Women with Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Peter Bulova
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 5.128

4. 

Authors:  William F Sullivan; Heidi Diepstra; John Heng; Shara Ally; Elspeth Bradley; Ian Casson; Brian Hennen; Maureen Kelly; Marika Korossy; Karen McNeil; Dara Abells; Khush Amaria; Kerry Boyd; Meg Gemmill; Elizabeth Grier; Natalie Kennie-Kaulbach; Mackenzie Ketchell; Jessica Ladouceur; Amanda Lepp; Yona Lunsky; Shirley McMillan; Ullanda Niel; Samantha Sacks; Sarah Shea; Katherine Stringer; Kyle Sue; Sandra Witherbee
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Cohort profile: Scotland's record-linkage e-cohorts of people with intellectual disabilities, and autistic people (SCIDA).

Authors:  Sally-Ann Cooper; Angela Henderson; Deborah Kinnear; Daniel Mackay; Michael Fleming; Gillian S Smith; Laura Anne Hughes-McCormack; Ewelina Rydzewska; Kirsty Dunn; J P Pell; Craig Melville
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 3.006

6.  Screening for cervical cancer in women with disability and multimorbidity: a retrospective cohort study in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Aisha Lofters; Sara Guilcher; Richard H Glazier; Susan Jaglal; Jennifer Voth; Ahmed M Bayoumi
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2014-10-01

7.  The validity of self-reported cancer screening history and the role of social disadvantage in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Aisha Lofters; Mandana Vahabi; Richard H Glazier
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Uptake of colorectal cancer screening among Ontarians with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

Authors:  Hélène Ouellette-Kuntz; Helen Coo; Virginie Cobigo; Andrew S Wilton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The influence of multi-morbidities on colorectal cancer screening recommendations and completion.

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Carrie M Nielson; Erin M Keast; Amanda F Petrik; Jerry M Suls
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 2.506

10.  Developing research priorities for palliative care of people with intellectual disabilities in Europe: a consultation process using nominal group technique.

Authors:  I Tuffrey-Wijne; M Wicki; P Heslop; M McCarron; S Todd; D Oliver; A de Veer; G Ahlström; S Schäper; G Hynes; J O'Farrell; J Adler; F Riese; L Curfs
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.234

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.