| Literature DB >> 23505536 |
Mary Sproull1, Dane Avondoglio, Tamalee Kramp, Uma Shankavaram, Kevin Camphausen.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Ablative bone marrow irradiation is an integral part of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. These treatment regimens are based on classically held models of radiation dose and the bone marrow response. Flt-3 ligand (FL) has been suggested as a marker of hematopoiesis and bone marrow status but the kinetics of its response to bone marrow irradiation has yet to be fully characterized. In the current study, we examine plasma FL response to total body and partial body irradiation in mice and its relationship with irradiation dose, time of collection and pattern of bone marrow exposure. MATERIALS/Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23505536 PMCID: PMC3591371 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058558
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1FL Levels Following TBI.
FL levels correlate with dose of irradiation and time of collection. A) Plasma FL levels in TBI C57BL6 mice at 24, 48 and 72 hrs post-IR at doses between 0 and 8 Gy. B) Extended time course of plasma FL expression in TBI C57BL6 mice at 0, 4 and 8 Gy at time points between 24 hrs and 3wks post-IR. Values reflect the mean ± SEM.
Figure 2Partial Body Irradiation Patterns and FL Response.
Plasma FL expression following heterogeneous partial body irradiation patterns in C57BL6 mice. A) Mice were partially shielded to irradiation using the represented partial body diagrams with either the head, limbs, trunk, or trunk+limbs exposed. B) Plasma FL expression in partial body exposed mice at 0, 2, and 8 Gy at 24 hrs post-IR. C) Plasma FL expression in partial body exposed mice at 0, 2, and 8 Gy at 72 hrs post-IR. Values reflect the mean ± SEM.
Figure 3FL Blinded Dose Prediction Model.
FL values at doses of 0–8 Gy in TBI C57BL6 mouse plasma used to generate dose prediction models for blinded dose prediction study at 24 and 72 hrs post-IR. Values reflect the mean ± SEM.
Results of Blinded Dose Prediction Analysis Using Plasma FL at 24 hrs and 72 hrs following Total Body Irradiation.
| Treatment Group | Prediction Method | % Correct | # Correct | Collection Timepoint | |
| Gated | Linear | ||||
| Control/1 Gy | x | 100 | 18/18 | 24 hr | |
| x | 94 | 17/18 | 24 hr | ||
| 4 Gy/8 Gy | x | 84 | 16/19 | 24 hr | |
| x | 90 | 17/19 | 24 hr | ||
| Control | x | 80 | 8/10 | 72 hr | |
| x | 80 | 8/10 | 72 hr | ||
| 1 Gy | x | 75 | 6/8 | 72 hr | |
| x | 75 | 6/8 | 72 hr | ||
| 4 Gy | x | 89 | 8/9 | 72 hr | |
| x | 78 | 7/9 | 72 hr | ||
| 8 Gy | x | 90 | 9/10 | 72 hr | |
| x | 90 | 9/10 | 72 hr | ||
#Correct represents the number of correct predictions over # of total animals in that group. 72 hr time point prediction analysis includes evaluation of 24 hr/72 hr FL trend as described in the text.
Samples pooled from the stated treatment groups and evaluated as a single cohort.