Literature DB >> 23504730

Improving our understanding of environmental controls on the distribution of C3 and C4 grasses.

Stephanie Pau1, Erika J Edwards, Christopher J Still.   

Abstract

A number of studies have demonstrated the ecological sorting of C3 and C4 grasses along temperature and moisture gradients. However, previous studies of C3 and C4 grass biogeography have often inadvertently compared species in different and relatively unrelated lineages, which are associated with different environmental settings and distinct adaptive traits. Such confounded comparisons of C3 and C4 grasses may bias our understanding of ecological sorting imposed strictly by photosynthetic pathway. Here, we used MaxEnt species distribution modeling in combination with satellite data to understand the functional diversity of C3 and C4 grasses by comparing both large clades and closely related sister taxa. Similar to previous work, we found that C4 grasses showed a preference for regions with higher temperatures and lower precipitation compared with grasses using the C3 pathway. However, air temperature differences were smaller (2 °C vs. 4 °C) and precipitation and % tree cover differences were larger (1783 mm vs. 755 mm, 21.3% vs. 7.7%, respectively) when comparing C3 and C4 grasses within the same clade vs. comparing all C4 and all C3 grasses (i.e., ignoring phylogenetic structure). These results were due to important differences in the environmental preferences of C3 BEP and PACMAD clades (the two main grass clades). Winter precipitation was found to be more important for understanding the distribution and environmental niche of C3 PACMADs in comparison with both C3 BEPs and C4 taxa, for which temperature was much more important. Results comparing closely related C3 -C4 sister taxa supported the patterns derived from our modeling of the larger clade groupings. Our findings, which are novel in comparing the distribution and niches of clades, demonstrate that the evolutionary history of taxa is important for understanding the functional diversity of C3 and C4 grasses, and should have implications for how grasslands will respond to global change.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23504730     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  11 in total

1.  Resolving the Dust Bowl paradox of grassland responses to extreme drought.

Authors:  Alan K Knapp; Anping Chen; Robert J Griffin-Nolan; Lauren E Baur; Charles J W Carroll; Jesse E Gray; Ava M Hoffman; Xiran Li; Alison K Post; Ingrid J Slette; Scott L Collins; Yiqi Luo; Melinda D Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Phenology and productivity of C3 and C4 grasslands in Hawaii.

Authors:  Stephanie Pau; Christopher J Still
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Noah's Ark conservation will not preserve threatened ecological communities under climate change.

Authors:  Rebecca Mary Bernadette Harris; Oberon Carter; Louise Gilfedder; Luciana Laura Porfirio; Greg Lee; Nathaniel Lee Bindoff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Physiological advantages of C4 grasses in the field: a comparative experiment demonstrating the importance of drought.

Authors:  Samuel H Taylor; Brad S Ripley; Tarryn Martin; Leigh-Ann De-Wet; F Ian Woodward; Colin P Osborne
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 10.863

5.  Contemporary Remotely Sensed Data Products Refine Invasive Plants Risk Mapping in Data Poor Regions.

Authors:  Tuyet T A Truong; Giles E St J Hardy; Margaret E Andrew
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  C4 trees have a broader niche than their close C3 relatives.

Authors:  Sophie N R Young; Luke T Dunning; Hui Liu; Carly J Stevens; Marjorie R Lundgren
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 7.298

7.  Patterns of plant biomass allocation in temperate grasslands across a 2500-km transect in northern China.

Authors:  Wentao Luo; Yong Jiang; Xiaotao Lü; Xue Wang; Mai-He Li; Edith Bai; Xingguo Han; Zhuwen Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  C4 photosynthesis promoted species diversification during the Miocene grassland expansion.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Spriggs; Pascal-Antoine Christin; Erika J Edwards
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Macro-Climatic Distribution Limits Show Both Niche Expansion and Niche Specialization among C4 Panicoids.

Authors:  Lone Aagesen; Fernando Biganzoli; Julia Bena; Ana C Godoy-Bürki; Renata Reinheimer; Fernando O Zuloaga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Evolutionary innovations driving abiotic stress tolerance in C4 grasses and cereals.

Authors:  Jeremy Pardo; Robert VanBuren
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 11.277

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.