Literature DB >> 23504151

Disentangling the effects of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status of neighborhood in cancer stage distribution in New York City.

Farhad Islami1, Amy R Kahn, Nina A Bickell, Maria J Schymura, Paolo Boffetta.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Stage at diagnosis is an important prognostic factor for the majority of cancers; it may be an indicator for quality of access to health care and is usually correlated with socioeconomic status (SES) and ethnicity/race. We aimed to investigate the association between stage of cancer at diagnosis with neighborhood of residence (as proxy for SES) and ethnicity/race, while controlling for each other, in selected areas of New York City (NYC).
METHODS: The cancer summary data (1999-2008) were provided by the New York State Cancer Registry. Multinomial logistic regression models were applied to calculate risk estimates for being diagnosed with late- or unknown-stage (versus early-stage) cancers in two low-SES and two high-SES neighborhoods of NYC and among several ethnic/racial groups for all cancers combined and cancers of the female breast, lung, colorectum, and prostate, with additional adjustments for sex (for all cancers combined), age, and year of diagnosis.
RESULTS: A total of 34,981 cancer cases were included in this study. There were significant and independent ethnic/racial and neighborhood disparities in stage of cancer at diagnosis of most of the cancers studied. The effect of ethnicity/race on the disparity appeared stronger than the effect of neighborhood. There was an overall decreasing trend in the proportion of late-stage cancers, particularly for colorectal cancer, and to a greater extent in the proportion of cancers without staging information.
CONCLUSIONS: In this population, ethnicity/race seems to be a stronger predictor for late stage at diagnosis than SES, stressing the need for ethnicity/race-oriented programs for cancer screening and improved access to care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23504151     DOI: 10.1007/s10552-013-0184-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  12 in total

1.  Cancer mortality disparities among New York City's Upper Manhattan neighborhoods.

Authors:  Dana Hashim; Marta Manczuk; Randall Holcombe; Roberto Lucchini; Paolo Boffetta
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 2.  Elimination of socioeconomic and racial disparities related to lung cancer: closing the gap at a high volume community cancer center.

Authors:  Michael Z Caposole; Kaylee Miller; Jehovah-Nissi Kim; Nancy A Steward; Thomas L Bauer
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.279

3.  Trends in Mortality Due to Cancer in the United States by Age and County-Level Income, 1999-2015.

Authors:  Diana R Withrow; Amy Berrington de González; Susan Spillane; Neal D Freedman; Ana F Best; Yingxi Chen; Meredith S Shiels
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Effect Modification of the Association Between Race and Stage at Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis by Socioeconomic Status.

Authors:  Kaitlin M McGrew; Jennifer D Peck; Sara K Vesely; Amanda E Janitz; Cuyler A Snider; Tyler M Dougherty; Janis E Campbell
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2019 Sep/Oct

5.  Associations between socio-economic status and dietary patterns in US black and white adults.

Authors:  K P Kell; S E Judd; K E Pearson; J M Shikany; J R Fernández
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 3.718

6.  Standardized cancer incidence disparities in Upper Manhattan New York City neighborhoods: the role of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and known risk factors.

Authors:  Dana Hashim; Zeinab Farhat; Sylvan Wallenstein; Marta Manczuk; Randall F Holcombe; Lorna Thorpe; Maria J Schymura; Roberto G Lucchini; Paolo Boffetta
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  Socioeconomic status is independently associated with overall survival in patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Mark A Fiala; Joseph D Finney; Jingxia Liu; Keith E Stockerl-Goldstein; Michael H Tomasson; Ravi Vij; Tanya M Wildes
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2015-03-08

8.  Impact of paternal education on epigenetic ageing in adolescence and mid-adulthood: a multi-cohort study in the USA and Mexico.

Authors:  Brian T Joyce; Tao Gao; Kalsea Koss; Yinan Zheng; Andres Cardenas; Jonathan Heiss; Allan Just; Kai Zhang; Linda van Horn; Norrina Bai Allen; Philip Greenland; Sheldon Cohen; Penny Gordon-Larsen; Colter Mitchell; Sara McLanahan; Lisa Schneper; Daniel Notterman; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Emily Oken; Marie-France Hivert; Robert Wright; Andrea Baccarelli; Donald Lloyd-Jones; Lifang Hou
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 9.685

9.  A comparative analysis of breast cancer stage between women enrolled in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program and women not participating in the program.

Authors:  Manxia Wu; Harland Austin; Christie R Eheman; Zachary Myles; Jacqueline Miller; Janet Royalty; A Blythe Ryerson
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 2.506

10.  The effect of neighborhood-level socioeconomic status on racial differences in ovarian cancer treatment in a population-based analysis in Chicago.

Authors:  Charlotte E Joslin; Katherine C Brewer; Faith G Davis; Kent Hoskins; Caryn E Peterson; Heather A Pauls
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 5.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.