| Literature DB >> 23503963 |
Abstract
The introduction of the technique of intracytoplasmic sperm injection to achieve fertilization, especially using surgically retrieved testicular or epididymal sperm from men with obstructive or non-obstructive azoospermia, has revolutionized the field of assisted reproduction. The techniques for the retrieval of spermatozoa vary from relatively simple percutaneous sperm aspiration to open excision (testicular biopsy) and the more invasive Micro-TESE. The probability of retrieving spermatozoa can be as high as 100% in men with obstructive azoospermia (congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens, status post-vasectomy). However, in nonobstructive azoospermia, successful sperm retrieval has been reported in 10-100% of cases by various investigators. The surgical retrieval and cryopreservation of sperm, especially in men with non-obstructive azoospermia, to some extent ensures the availability of sperm at the time of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. In addition, this strategy can avoid unnecessary ovarian stimulation in those patients intending to undergo in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection with freshly retrieved testicular sperm when an absolute absence of sperm in the testis is identified. Several different methods for the cryopreservation of testicular and epididymal sperm are available. The choice of the container or carrier may be an important consideration and should take into account the number or concentration of the sperm in the final preparation. When the number of sperm in a testicular biopsy sample is extremely low (e.g., 1-20 total sperm available), the use of an evacuated zona pellucida to store the cryopreserved sperm has been shown to be an effective approach.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23503963 PMCID: PMC3583152 DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2013(sup01)15
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) ISSN: 1807-5932 Impact factor: 2.365
Figure 1Probability of retrieving sperm in NOA by various surgical procedures (high to low).
Carriers used for sperm cryopreservation in microquantities.
| Carrier | Advantages | Disadvantages | Comments | References |
| Empty zona (mouse, hamster, or human) | Easy to handle the zona envelope; good sperm recovery and survival | Human or non-human biological material; Labor-intensive; Requires micromanipulation and in-house evacuation and preparation of the zona envelope | Successful pregnancy | 24,25,45,46 |
| Cryoloop | Commercially available | Requires a micromanipulator to load sperm onto the loop and is somewhat labor-intensive | Successful pregnancy | 27,28,47 |
| Mini straws or open-pulled straws | Easy and simple technique | Not feasible for an extremely low volume/number of sperm | Can be used to freeze severely oligospermic samples | 48 |
| ICSI pipette | Commercially available; found in every IVF lab | Fragile glass pipette; difficult to store and handle in liquid nitrogen | No reported pregnancies | 49 |
| Microdroplets | Easy and relatively simple technique | Difficult to handle and store in liquid nitrogen; Culture dishes are fragile when stored in liquid nitrogen; Variable recovery rates | Has yielded successful pregnancies; has not received widespread acceptance | 50-52 |
| Volvox globator algae | Inexpensive; plentifully available | Non-human biological material; labor-intensive advance preparation of algae spheres | Not suitable for human clinical use | 53 |
| Alginate beads or agarose microspheres | Inert polymers used as carriers | Very labor-intensive technique | No report of clinical pregnancies | 54,55 |
| Cryotop | Commercially available, easy to load and handle | - | Sperm recovery, survival similar to that obtained using the empty zona method | 56 |
Outcomes using testicular sperm in patients with obstructive azoospermia.
| Testicular Sperm | Fertilization (%) | Embryonic Cleavage (%) | Implantation (%) | Clinical Pregnancies (%) | Ongoing/Live births (%) | References |
| Fresh | 52 | 99 | - | 0 | 0 | 12 |
| Frozen-thawed | 51 | 96 | - | 6 | 6 | |
| Fresh | 58 | 98 | 33 | 33 | - | 57 |
| Frozen-thawed | 64 | 95 | 14 | 32 | - | |
| Fresh | 64 | 99 | - | 30 | 20 | 58 |
| Fresh | 62 | 93 | - | 25 | 20 | |
| Fresh | - | - | - | - | 23 | 59 |
| Frozen-thawed | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Fresh | 50 | - | 18 | 26 | 22 | 60 |
| Frozen-thawed | 49 | - | 14 | 29 | 19 | |
| Fresh | 72 | - | 33 | 69 | 44 | 31 |
| Frozen-thawed | 68 | - | 17 | 42 | 25 | |
| Fresh | 52 | 106 | 14 | 24 | 15 | 29 |
| Frozen-thawed | - | - | - | - | - |
>100% because embryos that did not show normal signs of fertilization (2 pronuclei) but that did show cleavage are included.
Rate of testicular sperm retrieval in men with non-obstructive azoospermia.
| Sperm Retrieval Technique | Rate of Sperm Retrieval | Comment | References |
| TESE | 13/15 (87%) | 5 | |
| Micro-TESE | 17/27 (63%) | 9 | |
| TESE | 15/25 (60%) | ||
| TESE | 14/18 (78%) | 61 | |
| TESE | 22/35 (63%) | Compared TESE and Multiple FNAs | 22 |
| Multiple FNAs | 5/35 (14%) | ||
| TESE | 33/55 (60%) | 43 | |
| TESE | 43/64 (67%) | 62 | |
| TESE | 15/42 (36%) | 63 | |
| TESA | 22/86 (26%) | 64 | |
| TESE | 5/48 (10%) | 48 patients with failed TESA underwent TESE | |
| TESE | 10/22 (45%) | Compared TESE and Micro-TESE | 18 |
| TESE | 10/17 (59%) | 65 | |
| TESE | 18/31 (58%) | 66 | |
| Multiple TESE | 13/37 (35%) | Compared multiple TESE and Micro TESE | 67 |
| Micro-TESE | 24/56 (43%) | 67 | |
| FNA | 35/51 (69%) | 2 patients who had no sperm retrieved during the first FNA attempt had a positive sperm retrieval during the second FNA attempt | 68 |
| TESE | 5/12 (42%) | Post-chemotherapy azoospermia | 69 |
| TESE | 23/30 (77%) | 31 | |
| TESE | 261/628 (42%) | First attempt | 70 |
| If no sperm retrieved, patients had multiple repeat biopsies | 77/103 (74%) | Second attempt | |
| 28/34 (82%) | Third attempt | ||
| 11/11 (100%) | Fourth attempt | ||
| 5/6 (83%) | Fifth Attempt | ||
| 2/2 (100%) | Sixth attempt | ||
| 384/784 (49%) | Overall | ||
| Micro-TESE | 57% | Compared TESE and Micro-TESE | 71 |
| TESE | 32% | ||
| TESE/Micro-TESE | 65/138 (47%) | 72 | |
| TESE | 87/258 (34%) | Compared TESE and Micro-TESE | 73 |
| Micro-TESE | 16/77 (21%) | ||
| TESE+Micro-TESE | 131/258 (51%) | ||
| Micro-TESE | 37/65 (57%) | Compared TESE and Micro-TESE | 20 |
| TESE | 26/68 (38%) | 20 | |
| Micro-TESE | 27/73 (37%) | Post-chemotherapy azoospermia | 74 |
Outcome using testicular sperm in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia.
| Testicular Sperm | Fertilization (%) | Embryonic Cleavage (%) | Implantation (%) | Clinical Pregnancies (%) | Ongoing pregnancies/Live births (%) | References |
| Fresh | 48 | 78 | 19 | - | 20 | 5 |
| Frozen-Thawed | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Fresh | 39 | 68 | 25 | 60 | 9 | |
| Frozen-Thawed | ||||||
| Fresh | 47 | 93 | 9 | 26 | 22 | 61 |
| Frozen-thawed | 44 | 89 | 11 | 27 | 9 | |
| Fresh | 66 | - | 13 | 30 | - | 62 |
| Frozen-Thawed | 58 | - | 18 | 50 | - | |
| Fresh | 54 | 97 | 13 | 27 | 20 | 43 |
| Frozen-thawed | 51 | 97 | 9 | 22 | 13 | |
| Fresh | 52 | 75 | 13 | 33 | - | 57 |
| Frozen-Thawed | 56 | 94 | 24 | 67 | - | |
| Fresh | 58 | 93 | - | 32 | - | 66 |
| Frozen-thawed | 55 | 93 | - | 29 | - | |
| Fresh | 67 | 93 | - | 29 | 18 | 58 |
| Frozen-Thawed | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Fresh | 68 | 85 | 7 | 13 | 13 | 70 |
| Frozen-Thawed | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Fresh | - | - | - | - | - | 44 |
| Frozen-thawed | 58 | 93 | 11.3 | 25 | 22 | |
| Fresh | 52-60 | - | - | 40-52 | 31-39 | 74 |
| Frozen-Thawed | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Fresh | 64 | - | - | 8 | 7 | 75 |
| Frozen-thawed | - | - | - | - | - |
Data represent a combination of OA (10 patients) and NOA (18 patients).