Literature DB >> 23503801

Application of the Chinese version of the MFI-20 in detecting the severe fatigue in cancer patients.

Jun Tian1, Jin-Sheng Hong.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to apply the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory Scale (MFI-20) for detecting severe fatigue in cancer patients, estimating the prevalence rates of severe fatigue in patients with various tumors and those receiving various treatments, as well as assessing the risk factors for severe fatigue in cancer patients after treatment.
METHODS: This study was divided into two stages. In the first stage, we randomly selected 353 residents and obtained their scores in the Chinese version of MFI-20. We then calculated the 95th percentile of their MFI-20 score. In the second stage, we selected 715 hospital cancer patients diagnosed from 2010 to 2011 and obtained their data on fatigue, resilience, and quality of life. The 95th percentile of the MFI-20 score in the residents was deemed as the cutoff score for detecting patients with severe fatigue. The χ (2) test was used to detect the differences among the prevalence rates of severe fatigue, and multivariate logistic regression was used to detect the predictors of severe fatigue after treatment.
RESULTS: The 95th percentile of the MFI-20 score in the residents was 60. The difference between the quality of life of patients with MFI-20 score ≤ 60 and patients with MFI-20 score >60 was statistically significant (92.33 ± 12.86 and 75.03 ± 15.85, t = 10.44, P < 0.0001). The prevalence of severe fatigue in cancer patients after treatment was 18.88 % (95 % confidence interval, 16.01-21.75 %). The prevalence rates of severe fatigue among patients with various tumors were significantly different (χ(2) = 17.59, P = 0.007), and the prevalence rates of severe fatigue among patients receiving various treatments were different (χ(2) = 8.25, P = 0.04). Patients with nasopharyngeal cancer were at the highest risk for severe fatigue (RR = 3.22), followed by patients with lung cancer and digestive tract cancer (RR = 2.41). Apart from the tumor site, old age (P = 0.01), advanced disease stage (P < 0.01), low resilience (P < 0.01), and radiotherapy (P = 0.03) were risk factors for severe fatigue after treatment.
CONCLUSION: The cutoff score of 60 is suitable for determining severe fatigue in the Chinese-version MFI-20. The prevalence of severe fatigue in cancer patients after treatment is moderate. Patients receiving radiotherapy are more likely to suffer from severe fatigue than those not receiving radiotherapy. The prevalence of severe fatigue in patients with nasopharynx, lung, and digestive tract cancers is higher than that in patients with other tumors. Patients with advanced disease stage, old age, and low resilience are at high risk for severe fatigue after treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23503801     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-013-1783-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  26 in total

Review 1.  The biologic basis of fatigue.

Authors:  H B Gutstein
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  Evidence report on the occurrence, assessment, and treatment of fatigue in cancer patients.

Authors:  Donald P Lawrence; Bruce Kupelnick; Kimberly Miller; Deirdre Devine; Joseph Lau
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2004

3.  NCCN Practice Guidelines for Cancer-Related Fatigue.

Authors:  V Mock; A Atkinson; A Barsevick; D Cella; B Cimprich; C Cleeland; J Donnelly; M A Eisenberger; C Escalante; P Hinds; P B Jacobsen; P Kaldor; S J Knight; A Peterman; B F Piper; H Rugo; P Sabbatini; C Stahl
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.990

4.  Resource loss, resource gain, and psychological resilience and dysfunction following cancer diagnosis: a growth mixture modeling approach.

Authors:  Wai Kai Hou; Chi Ching Law; Jing Yin; Yiu Tung Fu
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Resilience Scale and its short version.

Authors:  Daisuke Nishi; Ritei Uehara; Maki Kondo; Yutaka Matsuoka
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2010-11-17

6.  Is cancer-related fatigue more strongly correlated to haematological or to psychological factors in cancer patients?

Authors:  F Romito; R Montanaro; C Corvasce; M Di Bisceglie; V Mattioli
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Assessing fatigue and self-care strategies in patients receiving radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Diana Borthwick; Gillian Knowles; Shanne McNamara; Rita O' Dea; Paul Stroner
Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.398

8.  Predictors of cancer-related fatigue in women with breast cancer before, during, and after adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Diane M Von Ah; Duck-Hee Kang; Janet S Carpenter
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.592

9.  The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue.

Authors:  E M Smets; B Garssen; B Bonke; J C De Haes
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.006

10.  Assessment of clinical relevant fatigue level in cancer.

Authors:  Yoon Jung Chang; Jung Suk Lee; Chang Geol Lee; Won Sup Lee; Keun Seok Lee; Soo-Mee Bang; Xin Shelley Wang; Tito R Mendoza; Charles S Cleeland; Young Ho Yun
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.359

View more
  6 in total

1.  Reproductive concerns and contributing factors in women of childbearing age with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Xingxin Wang; Jingjing Li; Qian Liang; Xiaowei Ni; Rui Zhao; Ting Fu; Juan Ji; Liren Li; Zhifeng Gu; Chen Dong
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.650

2.  Prioritisation of treatment goals among older patients with non-curable cancer: the OPTion randomised controlled trial in Dutch primary care.

Authors:  Mariken E Stegmann; Daan Brandenbarg; An Kl Reyners; Wouter H van Geffen; T Jeroen N Hiltermann; Annette J Berendsen
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Resilience and Posttraumatic Growth of Patients With Breast Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic in China: The Mediating Effect of Recovery.

Authors:  Jing Shi; Kristin K Sznajder; Shuo Liu; Xinyue Xie; Xiaoshi Yang; Zhen Zheng
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-01-20

4.  Effects of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on fatigue interference and health-related quality of life among patients with advanced lung cancer: A pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Huiyuan Li; Xiaohuan Jin; Marques Shek Nam Ng; Ka Fai Mann; Nina Wang; Cho Lee Wong
Journal:  Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2022-06-09

5.  Fatigue have impact on the sexual problems in Chinese females with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Lijuan Zhang; Beiwen Wu; Junna Ye
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 2.742

6.  Fatigue in cancer patients: comparison with the general population and prognostic factors.

Authors:  Andreas Hinz; Joachim Weis; Elmar Brähler; Martin Härter; Kristina Geue; Jochen Ernst
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 3.603

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.