Wai Kai Hou1, Chi Ching Law2, Jing Yin3, Yiu Tung Fu2. 1. Department of Psychological Studies, Hong Kong Institute of Education. 2. Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital. 3. Social Neuroscience Research Network, University of Hong Kong.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated trajectories of psychological distress and their relationships with change in psychosocial resources in the year following cancer diagnosis. DESIGN: Chinese colorectal cancer (CRC) patients (n = 234) were assessed within 12 weeks of diagnosis (T1) and again at 3-month (T2) and 12-month (T3) follow-ups. Growth mixture modeling was used to analyze the longitudinal data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Psychological distress was measured at the three time-points using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). RESULTS: Growth mixture models identified four classes: chronic distress (7-9%), delayed distress (10-13%), recovery (13-16%), and resilient (65-67%). People in chronic distress were more likely to demonstrate loss in physical functioning and social relational quality than those in delayed distress, and loss in physical functioning, optimism, and hope than those in recovery, but more likely to demonstrate stability/gain in optimistic personalities than those in delayed distress and resilient. People in resilient were more likely to report stability/gain in optimistic personalities than those in delayed distress but not those in recovery. CONCLUSION: Understanding differential outcome trajectories and associated change in coping resources has implications for developing ongoing psychological services for cancer patients during the diagnosis and treatment process. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved).
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated trajectories of psychological distress and their relationships with change in psychosocial resources in the year following cancer diagnosis. DESIGN: Chinese colorectal cancer (CRC) patients (n = 234) were assessed within 12 weeks of diagnosis (T1) and again at 3-month (T2) and 12-month (T3) follow-ups. Growth mixture modeling was used to analyze the longitudinal data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Psychological distress was measured at the three time-points using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). RESULTS: Growth mixture models identified four classes: chronic distress (7-9%), delayed distress (10-13%), recovery (13-16%), and resilient (65-67%). People in chronic distress were more likely to demonstrate loss in physical functioning and social relational quality than those in delayed distress, and loss in physical functioning, optimism, and hope than those in recovery, but more likely to demonstrate stability/gain in optimistic personalities than those in delayed distress and resilient. People in resilient were more likely to report stability/gain in optimistic personalities than those in delayed distress but not those in recovery. CONCLUSION: Understanding differential outcome trajectories and associated change in coping resources has implications for developing ongoing psychological services for cancerpatients during the diagnosis and treatment process. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved).
Authors: Catherine E Mosher; Joseph G Winger; Barbara A Given; Paul R Helft; Bert H O'Neil Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2015-08-27 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Allison J Applebaum; Emma M Stein; Jennifer Lord-Bessen; Hayley Pessin; Barry Rosenfeld; William Breitbart Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2013-10-07 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Laura B Dunn; Bruce A Cooper; John Neuhaus; Claudia West; Steven Paul; Bradley Aouizerat; Gary Abrams; Janet Edrington; Debby Hamolsky; Christine Miaskowski Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2011-07-04 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Anand Dhruva; Bradley E Aouizerat; Bruce Cooper; Steven M Paul; Marylin Dodd; Claudia West; William Wara; Kathryn Lee; Laura B Dunn; Dale J Langford; John D Merriman; Christina Baggott; Janine Cataldo; Christine Ritchie; Kord Kober; Heather Leutwyler; Christine Miaskowski Journal: Eur J Oncol Nurs Date: 2013-09-05 Impact factor: 2.398
Authors: Catherine E Mosher; Joseph G Winger; Barbara A Given; Safi Shahda; Paul R Helft Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-04-22 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Alfred C Marcus; Michael A Diefenbach; Annette L Stanton; Suzanne M Miller; Linda Fleisher; Peter C Raich; Marion E Morra; Rosemarie Slevin Perocchia; Zung Vu Tran; Mary Anne Bright Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2013-02-28