BACKGROUND: Many patients scheduled for elective surgery are referred for a preoperative medical consultation. Only limited data are available on factors associated with preoperative consultations. The authors hypothesized that surgical specialty contributes to variation in referrals for preoperative consultations. METHODS: This is a cohort study using data from Group Health Cooperative, an integrated healthcare system. The authors included 13,673 patients undergoing a variety of common procedures-primarily low-risk surgeries-representing six surgical specialties, in 2005-2006. The authors identified consultations by family physicians, general internists, pulmonologists, or cardiologists in the 42 days preceding surgery. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the association between surgical specialty and consultation, adjusting for potential confounders including the revised cardiac risk index, age, gender, Deyo comorbidity index, number of prescription medications, and 11 medication classes. RESULTS: The authors found that 3,063 (22%) of all patients had preoperative consultations, with significant variation by surgical specialty. Patients having ophthalmologic, orthopedic, or urologic surgery were more likely to have consultations compared with those having general surgery-adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) of 3.8 (3.3-4.2), 1.5 (1.3-1.7), and 2.3 (1.8-2.8), respectively. Preoperative consultations were more common in patients with lower revised cardiac risk scores. CONCLUSION: There is substantial practice variation among surgical specialties with regard to the use of preoperative consultations in this integrated healthcare system. Given the large number of consultations provided for patients with low cardiac risk and for patients presenting for low-risk surgeries, their indications, the financial burden, and cost-effectiveness of consultations deserve further study.
BACKGROUND: Many patients scheduled for elective surgery are referred for a preoperative medical consultation. Only limited data are available on factors associated with preoperative consultations. The authors hypothesized that surgical specialty contributes to variation in referrals for preoperative consultations. METHODS: This is a cohort study using data from Group Health Cooperative, an integrated healthcare system. The authors included 13,673 patients undergoing a variety of common procedures-primarily low-risk surgeries-representing six surgical specialties, in 2005-2006. The authors identified consultations by family physicians, general internists, pulmonologists, or cardiologists in the 42 days preceding surgery. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the association between surgical specialty and consultation, adjusting for potential confounders including the revised cardiac risk index, age, gender, Deyo comorbidity index, number of prescription medications, and 11 medication classes. RESULTS: The authors found that 3,063 (22%) of all patients had preoperative consultations, with significant variation by surgical specialty. Patients having ophthalmologic, orthopedic, or urologic surgery were more likely to have consultations compared with those having general surgery-adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) of 3.8 (3.3-4.2), 1.5 (1.3-1.7), and 2.3 (1.8-2.8), respectively. Preoperative consultations were more common in patients with lower revised cardiac risk scores. CONCLUSION: There is substantial practice variation among surgical specialties with regard to the use of preoperative consultations in this integrated healthcare system. Given the large number of consultations provided for patients with low cardiac risk and for patients presenting for low-risk surgeries, their indications, the financial burden, and cost-effectiveness of consultations deserve further study.
Authors: Jeffrey L Apfelbaum; Richard T Connis; David G Nickinovich; L Reuven Pasternak; James F Arens; Robert A Caplan; Richard T Connis; Lee A Fleisher; Richard Flowerdew; Barbara S Gold; James F Mayhew; David G Nickinovich; Linda Jo Rice; Michael F Roizen; Rebecca S Twersky Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Amir Qaseem; Patrick Alguire; Paul Dallas; Lawrence E Feinberg; Faith T Fitzgerald; Carrie Horwitch; Linda Humphrey; Richard LeBlond; Darilyn Moyer; Jeffrey G Wiese; Steven Weinberger Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2012-01-17 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: O D Schein; J Katz; E B Bass; J M Tielsch; L H Lubomski; M A Feldman; B G Petty; E P Steinberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-01-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lee A Fleisher; Joshua A Beckman; Kenneth A Brown; Hugh Calkins; Elliot L Chaikof; Kirsten E Fleischmann; William K Freeman; James B Froehlich; Edward K Kasper; Judy R Kersten; Barbara Riegel; John F Robb Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-11-24 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Duminda N Wijeysundera; Peter C Austin; W Scott Beattie; Janet E Hux; Andreas Laupacis Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Stephan R Thilen; Miriam M Treggiari; Jane M Lange; Elliott Lowy; Edward M Weaver; Duminda N Wijeysundera Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Seshadri C Mudumbai; Suzann Pershing; Tom Bowe; Robin N Kamal; Erika D Sears; Mary T Hawn; Dan Eisenberg; Andrea K Finlay; Hildi Hagedorn; Alex H S Harris Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-05-03
Authors: Stephan R Thilen; Alex L Woersching; Anda M Cornea; Elliott Lowy; Edward M Weaver; Miriam M Treggiari Journal: Perioper Med (Lond) Date: 2018-05-04