Literature DB >> 23500412

The Argus™ II retinal prosthesis: factors affecting patient selection for implantation.

Ashish Kishore Ahuja1, Matthew R Behrend.   

Abstract

The Argus II epiretinal prosthesis has been developed to provide partial restoration of vision to subjects blinded from outer retinal degenerative disease. To date, the device has been implanted in multiple subjects with profound retinitis pigmentosa as part of a worldwide clinical feasibility study (clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT00407602). The Argus II is intended to provide partial restoration of functional vision. Most subjects showed an improvement in tasks assessing orientation & mobility, spatial-motor localization, and ability of discerning the direction of motion of moving stimuli. Roughly one third of subjects experienced measurable improvement in visual acuity with the implant. Some subjects identified words with high accuracy, a result that has also been reported by the leading subretinal implant group. Perceptual threshold was correlated with electrode-retina distance, electrode-fovea distance, and light sensitivity, either as single variables or in bivariate linear regression. Taken together these three variables may be used to inform patient selection and develop algorithms for the fitting of higher-electrode count systems. Visual acuity for future generations of the Argus implant may not hit theoretical limitations until arrays hold an excess of several hundreds of electrodes. Nevertheless, preliminary safety and efficacy data are supportive of the development of higher-resolution systems that target macular placement from implant design and surgical perspectives.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low-vision clinical trial; Retinal prosthesis; Retinitis pigmentosa; Vision restoration

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23500412     DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2013.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res        ISSN: 1350-9462            Impact factor:   21.198


  27 in total

1.  False reaching movements in localization test and effect of auditory feedback in simulated ultra-low vision subjects and patients with retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Takao Endo; Hiroyuki Kanda; Masakazu Hirota; Takeshi Morimoto; Kohji Nishida; Takashi Fujikado
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Interphase gap as a means to reduce electrical stimulation thresholds for epiretinal prostheses.

Authors:  Andrew C Weitz; Matthew R Behrend; Ashish K Ahuja; Punita Christopher; Jianing Wei; Varalakshmi Wuyyuru; Uday Patel; Robert J Greenberg; Mark S Humayun; Robert H Chow; James D Weiland
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Changes in intrinsic excitability of ganglion cells in degenerated retinas of RCS rats.

Authors:  Yi-Ming Ren; Chuan-Huang Weng; Cong-Jian Zhao; Zheng-Qin Yin
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Intra-operative microscope-integrated swept-source optical coherence tomography guided placement of Argus II retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  Dilraj S Grewal; Oscar M Carrasco-Zevallos; Randall Gunther; Joseph A Izatt; Cynthia A Toth; Paul Hahn
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.761

5.  Light localization with low-contrast targets in a patient implanted with a suprachoroidal-transretinal stimulation retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  Takao Endo; Takashi Fujikado; Masakazu Hirota; Hiroyuki Kanda; Takeshi Morimoto; Kohji Nishida
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Active confocal imaging for visual prostheses.

Authors:  Jae-Hyun Jung; Doron Aloni; Yitzhak Yitzhaky; Eli Peli
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  A multi-scale computational model for the study of retinal prosthetic stimulation.

Authors:  Kyle Loizos; Gianluca Lazzi; J Scott Lauritzen; James Anderson; Bryan W Jones; Robert Marc
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2014

8.  Comparing object recognition from binary and bipolar edge images for visual prostheses.

Authors:  Jae-Hyun Jung; Tian Pu; Eli Peli
Journal:  J Electron Imaging       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 0.945

9.  Retinal Degeneration Reduces Consistency of Network-Mediated Responses Arising in Ganglion Cells to Electric Stimulation.

Authors:  Young Jun Yoon; Jae-Ik Lee; Ye Ji Jang; Seungki An; Jae Hun Kim; Shelley I Fried; Maesoon Im
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.802

10.  Improving the spatial resolution of epiretinal implants by increasing stimulus pulse duration.

Authors:  Andrew C Weitz; Devyani Nanduri; Matthew R Behrend; Alejandra Gonzalez-Calle; Robert J Greenberg; Mark S Humayun; Robert H Chow; James D Weiland
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 17.956

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.