Literature DB >> 23500223

Outcome of combined stenotic and regurgitant aortic valve disease.

Robert Zilberszac1, Harald Gabriel, Michael Schemper, David Zahler, Martin Czerny, Gerald Maurer, Raphael Rosenhek.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to describe the natural history of combined stenotic and regurgitant aortic valve disease.
BACKGROUND: Data on outcome and prognostic factors in combined aortic valve disease are scarce.
METHODS: This study prospectively followed 71 consecutive asymptomatic patients (21 women, age 52 ± 17 years) with at least moderate aortic stenosis in combination with at least moderate aortic regurgitation and preserved left ventricular function (ejection fraction ≥55%).
RESULTS: During a median potential follow-up of 8.9 years, 50 patients developed an indication for aortic valve replacement and no cardiac deaths were observed. Overall event rates were high with an event-free survival for the entire patient population of 82 ± 5%, 62 ± 6%, 49 ± 6%, 33 ± 6%, and 19 ± 5% at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 years, respectively. There was 1 operative and no post-operative deaths. Peak aortic jet velocity (AV-Vel) independently predicted event-free survival. Patients with an AV-Vel between 3 and 3.9 m/s had an event-free survival of 94 ± 4%, 88 ± 6%, 65 ± 9%, and 51 ± 9% after 1, 2, 4, and 6 years, respectively, compared with 92 ± 4%, 67 ± 7%, 38 ± 8%, and 12 ± 6% for patients with an AV-Vel between 4 and 4.9 m/s and 67 ± 8%, 39 ± 10%, 17 ± 9%, and 0% for patients with an AV-Vel ≥5 m/s (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Asymptomatic patients with combined aortic valve disease can be safely followed until surgical criteria defined for aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation, or the aorta are reached. However, high event rates can be expected even in younger patients and those with only moderate disease. AV-Vel, which reflects both stenosis and regurgitant severity, provides an objective and easily assessable predictive parameter.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23500223     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  14 in total

1.  Mixed aortic valve disease in the young: initial observations.

Authors:  Allison C Hill; David W Brown; Steven D Colan; Kimberly Gauvreau; Pedro J del Nido; James E Lock; Rahul H Rathod
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  A correlation between long-term in vitro dynamic calcification and abnormal flow patterns past bioprosthetic heart valves.

Authors:  Oleksandr Barannyk; Robert Fraser; Peter Oshkai
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 1.365

Review 3.  Aortic valvular imaging with cardiovascular magnetic resonance: seeking for comprehensiveness.

Authors:  Gianluca De Rubeis; Nicola Galea; Isabella Ceravolo; Gian Marco Dacquino; Iacopo Carbone; Carlo Catalano; Marco Francone
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis and heart failure.

Authors:  Chirag Bavishi; Dhaval Kolte; Paul C Gordon; J Dawn Abbott
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.214

5.  Impact of Pulmonary Valve Regurgitation on Pressure Difference of Pulmonary Valve Stenosis in Patients with Tetralogy of Fallot After Repair.

Authors:  Shinichiro Sakaki; Tomoaki Murakami; Masahiro Shiraishi; Mamoru Yamamoto
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 1.655

6.  Outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement for mixed aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Jennifer L Philip; Tiffany Zens; Lucian Lozonschi; Nilto C De Oliveira; Satoru Osaki; Takushi Kohmoto; Shahab A Akhter; Paul C Tang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  The role of TTE in assessment of the patient before and following TAVI for AS.

Authors:  John Fryearson; Nicola C Edwards; Sagar N Doshi; Richard P Steeds
Journal:  Echo Res Pract       Date:  2016-04-14

8.  Differences in Aortic Valve and Left Ventricular Parameters Related to the Severity of Myocardial Fibrosis in Patients with Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis.

Authors:  Inyoung Song; Sung Min Ko; Jeong Geun Yi; Hyun Keun Chee; Jun Seok Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Long-term Transcatheter Aortic Valve Durability.

Authors:  Giuliano Costa; Enrico Criscione; Denise Todaro; Corrado Tamburino; Marco Barbanti
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2019-05-21

10.  Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Mixed Aortic Valve Disease and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Nicolas Isaza; Milind Y Desai; Samir R Kapadia; Amar Krishnaswamy; L Leonardo Rodriguez; Richard A Grimm; Julijana Z Conic; Yoshihito Saijo; Eric E Roselli; A Marc Gillinov; Douglas R Johnston; Lars G Svensson; Brian P Griffin; Zoran B Popović
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.