Literature DB >> 23500179

Transcorneal alternating current stimulation after severe axon damage in rats results in "long-term silent survivor" neurons.

Petra Henrich-Noack1, Stefanie Lazik, Elena Sergeeva, Sebastian Wagner, Nadine Voigt, Sylvia Prilloff, Anton Fedorov, Bernhard A Sabel.   

Abstract

Transcorneal alternating current stimulation (tACS) was proposed to decrease acute death of retinal ganglion cells after optic nerve transection in rats, but it is not known if cell survival is long-term and associated with functional restoration. We therefore evaluated the effects of tACS in a rat model of optic nerve crush using anatomical, electrophysiological and behavioural measures. Rats were trained in a brightness discrimination visual task and the retinal ganglion cell number was quantified with in vivo confocal neuroimaging. Thereafter, severe optic nerve crush or sham crush was performed and rats were treated under anaesthesia either with tACS or sham stimulation immediately after the lesion and on day 3, 7, 11, 15, 19 and 23. Brightness discrimination was evaluated for 6 weeks and retinal ganglion cells were counted in vivo on post-crush days 7 and 28. In additional rats we studied the influence of tACS on bioelectrical activity. On post-lesion day 28, the tACS-treated group showed a neuronal survival of 28.2% which was significantly greater than in sham operates (8.6%). All animals with optic nerve crush were significantly impaired in brightness discrimination and did not recover performance, irrespective to which group they belonged. In accordance with this, there was no significant influence of the stimulation on EEG power spectra. In conclusion, tACS induced long-term neuronal protection from delayed retrograde cell death, but in this case of severe axonal damage tACS did not influence functional restoration and EEG signals recorded over the visual cortex.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23500179     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2013.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Bull        ISSN: 0361-9230            Impact factor:   4.077


  8 in total

Review 1.  Electrical Stimulation as a Means for Improving Vision.

Authors:  Amer Sehic; Shuai Guo; Kin-Sang Cho; Rima M Corraya; Dong F Chen; Tor P Utheim
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 2.  Neuroprotective strategies for retinal disease.

Authors:  Machelle T Pardue; Rachael S Allen
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 21.198

3.  Low intensity repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation does not induce cell survival or regeneration in a mouse optic nerve crush model.

Authors:  Alexander D Tang; Kalina Makowiecki; Carole Bartlett; Jennifer Rodger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Cholinergic Potentiation of Restoration of Visual Function after Optic Nerve Damage in Rats.

Authors:  Mira Chamoun; Elena G Sergeeva; Petra Henrich-Noack; Shaobo Jia; Lisa Grigartzik; Jing Ma; Qing You; Frédéric Huppé-Gourgues; Bernhard A Sabel; Elvire Vaucher
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2017-08-27       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 5.  Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation: from acute to late-stage treatment of central nervous system damage.

Authors:  Petra Henrich-Noack; Elena G Sergeeva; Bernhard A Sabel
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 5.135

6.  Electrical brain stimulation induces dendritic stripping but improves survival of silent neurons after optic nerve damage.

Authors:  Petra Henrich-Noack; Elena G Sergeeva; Torben Eber; Qing You; Nadine Voigt; Jürgen Köhler; Sebastian Wagner; Stefanie Lazik; Christian Mawrin; Guihua Xu; Sayantan Biswas; Bernhard A Sabel; Christopher Kai-Shun Leung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Effects of tDCS-like electrical stimulation on retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Christianne E Strang; Mary Katherine Ray; Mary M Boggiano; Franklin R Amthor
Journal:  Eye Brain       Date:  2018-08-27

Review 8.  Target-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Deprivation Puts Retinal Ganglion Cells on Death Row: Cold Hard Evidence and Caveats.

Authors:  Marie Claes; Lies De Groef; Lieve Moons
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 5.923

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.